Theorem List for Intuitionistic Logic Explorer - 4701-4800 *Has distinct variable
group(s)
Type | Label | Description |
Statement |
|
Theorem | imass2 4701 |
Subset theorem for image. Exercise 22(a) of [Enderton] p. 53.
(Contributed by NM, 22-Mar-1998.)
|
|
|
Theorem | ndmima 4702 |
The image of a singleton outside the domain is empty. (Contributed by NM,
22-May-1998.)
|
|
|
Theorem | relcnv 4703 |
A converse is a relation. Theorem 12 of [Suppes] p. 62. (Contributed
by NM, 29-Oct-1996.)
|
|
|
Theorem | relbrcnvg 4704 |
When is a relation,
the sethood assumptions on brcnv 4518 can be
omitted. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Apr-2015.)
|
|
|
Theorem | relbrcnv 4705 |
When is a relation,
the sethood assumptions on brcnv 4518 can be
omitted. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Apr-2015.)
|
|
|
Theorem | cotr 4706* |
Two ways of saying a relation is transitive. Definition of transitivity
in [Schechter] p. 51. (Contributed by
NM, 27-Dec-1996.) (Proof
shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.)
|
|
|
Theorem | issref 4707* |
Two ways to state a relation is reflexive. Adapted from Tarski.
(Contributed by FL, 15-Jan-2012.) (Revised by NM, 30-Mar-2016.)
|
|
|
Theorem | cnvsym 4708* |
Two ways of saying a relation is symmetric. Similar to definition of
symmetry in [Schechter] p. 51.
(Contributed by NM, 28-Dec-1996.)
(Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.)
|
|
|
Theorem | intasym 4709* |
Two ways of saying a relation is antisymmetric. Definition of
antisymmetry in [Schechter] p. 51.
(Contributed by NM, 9-Sep-2004.)
(Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.)
|
|
|
Theorem | asymref 4710* |
Two ways of saying a relation is antisymmetric and reflexive.
is the field of a relation by relfld 4846. (Contributed by
NM, 6-May-2008.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.)
|
|
|
Theorem | intirr 4711* |
Two ways of saying a relation is irreflexive. Definition of
irreflexivity in [Schechter] p. 51.
(Contributed by NM, 9-Sep-2004.)
(Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.)
|
|
|
Theorem | brcodir 4712* |
Two ways of saying that two elements have an upper bound. (Contributed
by Mario Carneiro, 3-Nov-2015.)
|
|
|
Theorem | codir 4713* |
Two ways of saying a relation is directed. (Contributed by Mario
Carneiro, 22-Nov-2013.)
|
|
|
Theorem | qfto 4714* |
A quantifier-free way of expressing the total order predicate.
(Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Nov-2013.)
|
|
|
Theorem | xpidtr 4715 |
A square cross product is a transitive relation.
(Contributed by FL, 31-Jul-2009.)
|
|
|
Theorem | trin2 4716 |
The intersection of two transitive classes is transitive. (Contributed
by FL, 31-Jul-2009.)
|
|
|
Theorem | poirr2 4717 |
A partial order relation is irreflexive. (Contributed by Mario
Carneiro, 2-Nov-2015.)
|
|
|
Theorem | trinxp 4718 |
The relation induced by a transitive relation on a part of its field is
transitive. (Taking the intersection of a relation with a square cross
product is a way to restrict it to a subset of its field.) (Contributed
by FL, 31-Jul-2009.)
|
|
|
Theorem | soirri 4719 |
A strict order relation is irreflexive. (Contributed by NM,
10-Feb-1996.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 10-May-2013.)
|
|
|
Theorem | sotri 4720 |
A strict order relation is a transitive relation. (Contributed by NM,
10-Feb-1996.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 10-May-2013.)
|
|
|
Theorem | son2lpi 4721 |
A strict order relation has no 2-cycle loops. (Contributed by NM,
10-Feb-1996.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 10-May-2013.)
|
|
|
Theorem | sotri2 4722 |
A transitivity relation. (Read B < A and B < C implies A <
C .) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-May-2013.)
|
|
|
Theorem | sotri3 4723 |
A transitivity relation. (Read A < B and C < B implies A <
C .) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-May-2013.)
|
|
|
Theorem | poleloe 4724 |
Express "less than or equals" for general strict orders.
(Contributed by
Stefan O'Rear, 17-Jan-2015.)
|
|
|
Theorem | poltletr 4725 |
Transitive law for general strict orders. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear,
17-Jan-2015.)
|
|
|
Theorem | cnvopab 4726* |
The converse of a class abstraction of ordered pairs. (Contributed by
NM, 11-Dec-2003.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.)
|
|
|
Theorem | cnv0 4727 |
The converse of the empty set. (Contributed by NM, 6-Apr-1998.)
|
|
|
Theorem | cnvi 4728 |
The converse of the identity relation. Theorem 3.7(ii) of [Monk1]
p. 36. (Contributed by NM, 26-Apr-1998.) (Proof shortened by Andrew
Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.)
|
|
|
Theorem | cnvun 4729 |
The converse of a union is the union of converses. Theorem 16 of
[Suppes] p. 62. (Contributed by NM,
25-Mar-1998.) (Proof shortened by
Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.)
|
|
|
Theorem | cnvdif 4730 |
Distributive law for converse over set difference. (Contributed by
Mario Carneiro, 26-Jun-2014.)
|
|
|
Theorem | cnvin 4731 |
Distributive law for converse over intersection. Theorem 15 of [Suppes]
p. 62. (Contributed by NM, 25-Mar-1998.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro,
26-Jun-2014.)
|
|
|
Theorem | rnun 4732 |
Distributive law for range over union. Theorem 8 of [Suppes] p. 60.
(Contributed by NM, 24-Mar-1998.)
|
|
|
Theorem | rnin 4733 |
The range of an intersection belongs the intersection of ranges. Theorem
9 of [Suppes] p. 60. (Contributed by NM,
15-Sep-2004.)
|
|
|
Theorem | rniun 4734 |
The range of an indexed union. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro,
29-May-2015.)
|
|
|
Theorem | rnuni 4735* |
The range of a union. Part of Exercise 8 of [Enderton] p. 41.
(Contributed by NM, 17-Mar-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro,
29-May-2015.)
|
|
|
Theorem | imaundi 4736 |
Distributive law for image over union. Theorem 35 of [Suppes] p. 65.
(Contributed by NM, 30-Sep-2002.)
|
|
|
Theorem | imaundir 4737 |
The image of a union. (Contributed by Jeff Hoffman, 17-Feb-2008.)
|
|
|
Theorem | dminss 4738 |
An upper bound for intersection with a domain. Theorem 40 of [Suppes]
p. 66, who calls it "somewhat surprising." (Contributed by
NM,
11-Aug-2004.)
|
|
|
Theorem | imainss 4739 |
An upper bound for intersection with an image. Theorem 41 of [Suppes]
p. 66. (Contributed by NM, 11-Aug-2004.)
|
|
|
Theorem | inimass 4740 |
The image of an intersection (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux,
16-Dec-2017.)
|
|
|
Theorem | inimasn 4741 |
The intersection of the image of singleton (Contributed by Thierry
Arnoux, 16-Dec-2017.)
|
|
|
Theorem | cnvxp 4742 |
The converse of a cross product. Exercise 11 of [Suppes] p. 67.
(Contributed by NM, 14-Aug-1999.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon,
27-Aug-2011.)
|
|
|
Theorem | xp0 4743 |
The cross product with the empty set is empty. Part of Theorem 3.13(ii)
of [Monk1] p. 37. (Contributed by NM,
12-Apr-2004.)
|
|
|
Theorem | xpmlem 4744* |
The cross product of inhabited classes is inhabited. (Contributed by
Jim Kingdon, 11-Dec-2018.)
|
|
|
Theorem | xpm 4745* |
The cross product of inhabited classes is inhabited. (Contributed by
Jim Kingdon, 13-Dec-2018.)
|
|
|
Theorem | xpeq0r 4746 |
A cross product is empty if at least one member is empty. (Contributed by
Jim Kingdon, 12-Dec-2018.)
|
|
|
Theorem | xpdisj1 4747 |
Cross products with disjoint sets are disjoint. (Contributed by NM,
13-Sep-2004.)
|
|
|
Theorem | xpdisj2 4748 |
Cross products with disjoint sets are disjoint. (Contributed by NM,
13-Sep-2004.)
|
|
|
Theorem | xpsndisj 4749 |
Cross products with two different singletons are disjoint. (Contributed
by NM, 28-Jul-2004.)
|
|
|
Theorem | djudisj 4750* |
Disjoint unions with disjoint index sets are disjoint. (Contributed by
Stefan O'Rear, 21-Nov-2014.)
|
|
|
Theorem | resdisj 4751 |
A double restriction to disjoint classes is the empty set. (Contributed
by NM, 7-Oct-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.)
|
|
|
Theorem | rnxpm 4752* |
The range of a cross product. Part of Theorem 3.13(x) of [Monk1] p. 37,
with non-empty changed to inhabited. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon,
12-Dec-2018.)
|
|
|
Theorem | dmxpss 4753 |
The domain of a cross product is a subclass of the first factor.
(Contributed by NM, 19-Mar-2007.)
|
|
|
Theorem | rnxpss 4754 |
The range of a cross product is a subclass of the second factor.
(Contributed by NM, 16-Jan-2006.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon,
27-Aug-2011.)
|
|
|
Theorem | rnxpid 4755 |
The range of a square cross product. (Contributed by FL,
17-May-2010.)
|
|
|
Theorem | ssxpbm 4756* |
A cross-product subclass relationship is equivalent to the relationship
for its components. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-Dec-2018.)
|
|
|
Theorem | ssxp1 4757* |
Cross product subset cancellation. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon,
14-Dec-2018.)
|
|
|
Theorem | ssxp2 4758* |
Cross product subset cancellation. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon,
14-Dec-2018.)
|
|
|
Theorem | xp11m 4759* |
The cross product of inhabited classes is one-to-one. (Contributed by
Jim Kingdon, 13-Dec-2018.)
|
|
|
Theorem | xpcanm 4760* |
Cancellation law for cross-product. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon,
14-Dec-2018.)
|
|
|
Theorem | xpcan2m 4761* |
Cancellation law for cross-product. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon,
14-Dec-2018.)
|
|
|
Theorem | xpexr2m 4762* |
If a nonempty cross product is a set, so are both of its components.
(Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 14-Dec-2018.)
|
|
|
Theorem | ssrnres 4763 |
Subset of the range of a restriction. (Contributed by NM,
16-Jan-2006.)
|
|
|
Theorem | rninxp 4764* |
Range of the intersection with a cross product. (Contributed by NM,
17-Jan-2006.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.)
|
|
|
Theorem | dminxp 4765* |
Domain of the intersection with a cross product. (Contributed by NM,
17-Jan-2006.)
|
|
|
Theorem | imainrect 4766 |
Image of a relation restricted to a rectangular region. (Contributed by
Stefan O'Rear, 19-Feb-2015.)
|
|
|
Theorem | xpima1 4767 |
The image by a cross product. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux,
16-Dec-2017.)
|
|
|
Theorem | xpima2m 4768* |
The image by a cross product. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux,
16-Dec-2017.)
|
|
|
Theorem | xpimasn 4769 |
The image of a singleton by a cross product. (Contributed by Thierry
Arnoux, 14-Jan-2018.)
|
|
|
Theorem | cnvcnv3 4770* |
The set of all ordered pairs in a class is the same as the double
converse. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Aug-2015.)
|
|
|
Theorem | dfrel2 4771 |
Alternate definition of relation. Exercise 2 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 25.
(Contributed by NM, 29-Dec-1996.)
|
|
|
Theorem | dfrel4v 4772* |
A relation can be expressed as the set of ordered pairs in it.
(Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Aug-2015.)
|
|
|
Theorem | cnvcnv 4773 |
The double converse of a class strips out all elements that are not
ordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 8-Dec-2003.)
|
|
|
Theorem | cnvcnv2 4774 |
The double converse of a class equals its restriction to the universe.
(Contributed by NM, 8-Oct-2007.)
|
|
|
Theorem | cnvcnvss 4775 |
The double converse of a class is a subclass. Exercise 2 of
[TakeutiZaring] p. 25. (Contributed
by NM, 23-Jul-2004.)
|
|
|
Theorem | cnveqb 4776 |
Equality theorem for converse. (Contributed by FL, 19-Sep-2011.)
|
|
|
Theorem | cnveq0 4777 |
A relation empty iff its converse is empty. (Contributed by FL,
19-Sep-2011.)
|
|
|
Theorem | dfrel3 4778 |
Alternate definition of relation. (Contributed by NM, 14-May-2008.)
|
|
|
Theorem | dmresv 4779 |
The domain of a universal restriction. (Contributed by NM,
14-May-2008.)
|
|
|
Theorem | rnresv 4780 |
The range of a universal restriction. (Contributed by NM,
14-May-2008.)
|
|
|
Theorem | dfrn4 4781 |
Range defined in terms of image. (Contributed by NM, 14-May-2008.)
|
|
|
Theorem | csbrng 4782 |
Distribute proper substitution through the range of a class.
(Contributed by Alan Sare, 10-Nov-2012.)
|
|
|
Theorem | rescnvcnv 4783 |
The restriction of the double converse of a class. (Contributed by NM,
8-Apr-2007.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.)
|
|
|
Theorem | cnvcnvres 4784 |
The double converse of the restriction of a class. (Contributed by NM,
3-Jun-2007.)
|
|
|
Theorem | imacnvcnv 4785 |
The image of the double converse of a class. (Contributed by NM,
8-Apr-2007.)
|
|
|
Theorem | dmsnm 4786* |
The domain of a singleton is inhabited iff the singleton argument is an
ordered pair. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 15-Dec-2018.)
|
|
|
Theorem | rnsnm 4787* |
The range of a singleton is inhabited iff the singleton argument is an
ordered pair. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 15-Dec-2018.)
|
|
|
Theorem | dmsn0 4788 |
The domain of the singleton of the empty set is empty. (Contributed by
NM, 30-Jan-2004.)
|
|
|
Theorem | cnvsn0 4789 |
The converse of the singleton of the empty set is empty. (Contributed by
Mario Carneiro, 30-Aug-2015.)
|
|
|
Theorem | dmsn0el 4790 |
The domain of a singleton is empty if the singleton's argument contains
the empty set. (Contributed by NM, 15-Dec-2008.)
|
|
|
Theorem | relsn2m 4791* |
A singleton is a relation iff it has an inhabited domain. (Contributed
by Jim Kingdon, 16-Dec-2018.)
|
|
|
Theorem | dmsnopg 4792 |
The domain of a singleton of an ordered pair is the singleton of the
first member. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
|
|
|
Theorem | dmpropg 4793 |
The domain of an unordered pair of ordered pairs. (Contributed by Mario
Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
|
|
|
Theorem | dmsnop 4794 |
The domain of a singleton of an ordered pair is the singleton of the
first member. (Contributed by NM, 30-Jan-2004.) (Proof shortened by
Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro,
26-Apr-2015.)
|
|
|
Theorem | dmprop 4795 |
The domain of an unordered pair of ordered pairs. (Contributed by NM,
13-Sep-2011.)
|
|
|
Theorem | dmtpop 4796 |
The domain of an unordered triple of ordered pairs. (Contributed by NM,
14-Sep-2011.)
|
|
|
Theorem | cnvcnvsn 4797 |
Double converse of a singleton of an ordered pair. (Unlike cnvsn 4803,
this does not need any sethood assumptions on and .)
(Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
|
|
|
Theorem | dmsnsnsng 4798 |
The domain of the singleton of the singleton of a singleton.
(Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 16-Dec-2018.)
|
|
|
Theorem | rnsnopg 4799 |
The range of a singleton of an ordered pair is the singleton of the second
member. (Contributed by NM, 24-Jul-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro,
30-Apr-2015.)
|
|
|
Theorem | rnpropg 4800 |
The range of a pair of ordered pairs is the pair of second members.
(Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 3-Jan-2017.)
|
|