P. 19 of Theorem List - Intuitionistic Logic Explorer

Theorem List for Intuitionistic Logic Explorer - 1801-1900   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	cbvexdh 1801*	Deduction used to change bound variables, using implicit substitition, particularly useful in conjunction with dvelim 1893. (Contributed by NM, 2-Jan-2002.) (Proof rewritten by Jim Kingdon, 30-Dec-2017.)
|- ( ph -> A. y ph )   &    |- ( ph -> ( ps -> A. y ps ) )   &    |- ( ph -> ( x = y -> ( ps <-> ch ) ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( E. x ps <-> E. y ch ) )
Theorem	cbvexd 1802*	Deduction used to change bound variables, using implicit substitution, particularly useful in conjunction with dvelim 1893. (Contributed by NM, 2-Jan-2002.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 6-Oct-2016.) (Proof rewritten by Jim Kingdon, 10-Jun-2018.)
|- F/ y ph   &    |- ( ph -> F/ y ps )   &    |- ( ph -> ( x = y -> ( ps <-> ch ) ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( E. x ps <-> E. y ch ) )
Theorem	cbvaldva 1803*	Rule used to change the bound variable in a universal quantifier with implicit substitution. Deduction form. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.)
|- ( ( ph /\ x = y ) -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( A. x ps <-> A. y ch ) )
Theorem	cbvexdva 1804*	Rule used to change the bound variable in an existential quantifier with implicit substitution. Deduction form. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.)
|- ( ( ph /\ x = y ) -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( E. x ps <-> E. y ch ) )
Theorem	cbvex4v 1805*	Rule used to change bound variables, using implicit substitition. (Contributed by NM, 26-Jul-1995.)
|- ( ( x = v /\ y = u ) -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- ( ( z = f /\ w = g ) -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   =>    |- ( E. x E. y E. z E. w ph <-> E. v E. u E. f E. g ch )
Theorem	eean 1806	Rearrange existential quantifiers. (Contributed by NM, 27-Oct-2010.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 6-Oct-2016.)
|- F/ y ph   &    |- F/ x ps   =>    |- ( E. x E. y ( ph /\ ps ) <-> ( E. x ph /\ E. y ps ) )
Theorem	eeanv 1807*	Rearrange existential quantifiers. (Contributed by NM, 26-Jul-1995.)
|- ( E. x E. y ( ph /\ ps ) <-> ( E. x ph /\ E. y ps ) )
Theorem	eeeanv 1808*	Rearrange existential quantifiers. (Contributed by NM, 26-Jul-1995.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 25-May-2011.)
|- ( E. x E. y E. z ( ph /\ ps /\ ch ) <-> ( E. x ph /\ E. y ps /\ E. z ch ) )
Theorem	ee4anv 1809*	Rearrange existential quantifiers. (Contributed by NM, 31-Jul-1995.)
|- ( E. x E. y E. z E. w ( ph /\ ps ) <-> ( E. x E. y ph /\ E. z E. w ps ) )
Theorem	ee8anv 1810*	Rearrange existential quantifiers. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 23-Nov-2019.)
|- ( E. x E. y E. z E. w E. v E. u E. t E. s ( ph /\ ps ) <-> ( E. x E. y E. z E. w ph /\ E. v E. u E. t E. s ps ) )
Theorem	nexdv 1811*	Deduction for generalization rule for negated wff. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
|- ( ph -> -. ps )   =>    |- ( ph -> -. E. x ps )
Theorem	chvarv 1812*	Implicit substitution of y for x into a theorem. (Contributed by NM, 20-Apr-1994.)
|- ( x = y -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- ph   =>    |- ps
Theorem	cleljust 1813*	When the class variables of set theory are replaced with setvar variables, this theorem of predicate calculus is the result. This theorem provides part of the justification for the consistency of that definition, which "overloads" the setvar variables in wel 1394 with the class variables in wcel 1393. (Contributed by NM, 28-Jan-2004.)
|- ( x e. y <-> E. z ( z = x /\ z e. y ) )
1.4.5  More substitution theorems
Theorem	hbs1 1814*	x is not free in [ y / x ] ph when x and y are distinct. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Proof by Jim Kingdon, 16-Dec-2017.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( [ y / x ] ph -> A. x [ y / x ] ph )
Theorem	nfs1v 1815*	x is not free in [ y / x ] ph when x and y are distinct. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)
|- F/ x [ y / x ] ph
Theorem	sbhb 1816*	Two ways of expressing " x is (effectively) not free in ph." (Contributed by NM, 29-May-2009.)
|- ( ( ph -> A. x ph ) <-> A. y ( ph -> [ y / x ] ph ) )
Theorem	hbsbv 1817*	This is a version of hbsb 1823 with an extra distinct variable constraint, on z and x. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 25-Dec-2017.)
|- ( ph -> A. z ph )   =>    |- ( [ y / x ] ph -> A. z [ y / x ] ph )
Theorem	nfsbxy 1818*	Similar to hbsb 1823 but with an extra distinct variable constraint, on x and y. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 19-Mar-2018.)
|- F/ z ph   =>    |- F/ z [ y / x ] ph
Theorem	nfsbxyt 1819*	Closed form of nfsbxy 1818. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 9-May-2018.)
|- ( A. x F/ z ph -> F/ z [ y / x ] ph )
Theorem	sbco2vlem 1820*	This is a version of sbco2 1839 where z is distinct from x and from y. It is a lemma on the way to proving sbco2v 1821 which only requires that z and x be distinct. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 25-Dec-2017.) (One distinct variable constraint removed by Jim Kingdon, 3-Feb-2018.)
|- ( ph -> A. z ph )   =>    |- ( [ y / z ] [ z / x ] ph <-> [ y / x ] ph )
Theorem	sbco2v 1821*	This is a version of sbco2 1839 where z is distinct from x. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-Feb-2018.)
|- ( ph -> A. z ph )   =>    |- ( [ y / z ] [ z / x ] ph <-> [ y / x ] ph )
Theorem	nfsb 1822*	If z is not free in ph, it is not free in [ y / x ] ph when y and z are distinct. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.) (Proof rewritten by Jim Kingdon, 19-Mar-2018.)
|- F/ z ph   =>    |- F/ z [ y / x ] ph
Theorem	hbsb 1823*	If z is not free in ph, it is not free in [ y / x ] ph when y and z are distinct. (Contributed by NM, 12-Aug-1993.) (Proof rewritten by Jim Kingdon, 22-Mar-2018.)
|- ( ph -> A. z ph )   =>    |- ( [ y / x ] ph -> A. z [ y / x ] ph )
Theorem	equsb3lem 1824*	Lemma for equsb3 1825. (Contributed by NM, 4-Dec-2005.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 14-Jun-2011.)
|- ( [ x / y ] y = z <-> x = z )
Theorem	equsb3 1825*	Substitution applied to an atomic wff. (Contributed by Raph Levien and FL, 4-Dec-2005.)
|- ( [ x / y ] y = z <-> x = z )
Theorem	sbn 1826	Negation inside and outside of substitution are equivalent. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Proof rewritten by Jim Kingdon, 3-Feb-2018.)
|- ( [ y / x ] -. ph <-> -. [ y / x ] ph )
Theorem	sbim 1827	Implication inside and outside of substitution are equivalent. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Proof rewritten by Jim Kingdon, 3-Feb-2018.)
|- ( [ y / x ] ( ph -> ps ) <-> ( [ y / x ] ph -> [ y / x ] ps ) )
Theorem	sbor 1828	Logical OR inside and outside of substitution are equivalent. (Contributed by NM, 29-Sep-2002.) (Proof rewritten by Jim Kingdon, 3-Feb-2018.)
|- ( [ y / x ] ( ph \/ ps ) <-> ( [ y / x ] ph \/ [ y / x ] ps ) )
Theorem	sban 1829	Conjunction inside and outside of a substitution are equivalent. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Proof rewritten by Jim Kingdon, 3-Feb-2018.)
|- ( [ y / x ] ( ph /\ ps ) <-> ( [ y / x ] ph /\ [ y / x ] ps ) )
Theorem	sbrim 1830	Substitution with a variable not free in antecedent affects only the consequent. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
|- ( ph -> A. x ph )   =>    |- ( [ y / x ] ( ph -> ps ) <-> ( ph -> [ y / x ] ps ) )
Theorem	sblim 1831	Substitution with a variable not free in consequent affects only the antecedent. (Contributed by NM, 14-Nov-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 4-Oct-2016.)
|- F/ x ps   =>    |- ( [ y / x ] ( ph -> ps ) <-> ( [ y / x ] ph -> ps ) )
Theorem	sb3an 1832	Conjunction inside and outside of a substitution are equivalent. (Contributed by NM, 14-Dec-2006.)
|- ( [ y / x ] ( ph /\ ps /\ ch ) <-> ( [ y / x ] ph /\ [ y / x ] ps /\ [ y / x ] ch ) )
Theorem	sbbi 1833	Equivalence inside and outside of a substitution are equivalent. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
|- ( [ y / x ] ( ph <-> ps ) <-> ( [ y / x ] ph <-> [ y / x ] ps ) )
Theorem	sblbis 1834	Introduce left biconditional inside of a substitution. (Contributed by NM, 19-Aug-1993.)
|- ( [ y / x ] ph <-> ps )   =>    |- ( [ y / x ] ( ch <-> ph ) <-> ( [ y / x ] ch <-> ps ) )
Theorem	sbrbis 1835	Introduce right biconditional inside of a substitution. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-1993.)
|- ( [ y / x ] ph <-> ps )   =>    |- ( [ y / x ] ( ph <-> ch ) <-> ( ps <-> [ y / x ] ch ) )
Theorem	sbrbif 1836	Introduce right biconditional inside of a substitution. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-1993.)
|- ( ch -> A. x ch )   &    |- ( [ y / x ] ph <-> ps )   =>    |- ( [ y / x ] ( ph <-> ch ) <-> ( ps <-> ch ) )
Theorem	sbco2yz 1837*	This is a version of sbco2 1839 where z is distinct from y. It is a lemma on the way to proving sbco2 1839 which has no distinct variable constraints. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 19-Mar-2018.)
|- F/ z ph   =>    |- ( [ y / z ] [ z / x ] ph <-> [ y / x ] ph )
Theorem	sbco2h 1838	A composition law for substitution. (Contributed by NM, 30-Jun-1994.) (Proof rewritten by Jim Kingdon, 19-Mar-2018.)
|- ( ph -> A. z ph )   =>    |- ( [ y / z ] [ z / x ] ph <-> [ y / x ] ph )
Theorem	sbco2 1839	A composition law for substitution. (Contributed by NM, 30-Jun-1994.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 6-Oct-2016.)
|- F/ z ph   =>    |- ( [ y / z ] [ z / x ] ph <-> [ y / x ] ph )
Theorem	sbco2d 1840	A composition law for substitution. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
|- ( ph -> A. x ph )   &    |- ( ph -> A. z ph )   &    |- ( ph -> ( ps -> A. z ps ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( [ y / z ] [ z / x ] ps <-> [ y / x ] ps ) )
Theorem	sbco2vd 1841*	Version of sbco2d 1840 with a distinct variable constraint between x and z. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 19-Feb-2018.)
|- ( ph -> A. x ph )   &    |- ( ph -> A. z ph )   &    |- ( ph -> ( ps -> A. z ps ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( [ y / z ] [ z / x ] ps <-> [ y / x ] ps ) )
Theorem	sbco 1842	A composition law for substitution. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
|- ( [ y / x ] [ x / y ] ph <-> [ y / x ] ph )
Theorem	sbco3v 1843*	Version of sbco3 1848 with a distinct variable constraint between x and y. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 19-Feb-2018.)
|- ( [ z / y ] [ y / x ] ph <-> [ z / x ] [ x / y ] ph )
Theorem	sbcocom 1844	Relationship between composition and commutativity for substitution. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 28-Feb-2018.)
|- ( [ z / y ] [ y / x ] ph <-> [ z / y ] [ z / x ] ph )
Theorem	sbcomv 1845*	Version of sbcom 1849 with a distinct variable constraint between x and z. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 28-Feb-2018.)
|- ( [ y / z ] [ y / x ] ph <-> [ y / x ] [ y / z ] ph )
Theorem	sbcomxyyz 1846*	Version of sbcom 1849 with distinct variable constraints between x and y, and y and z. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 21-Mar-2018.)
|- ( [ y / z ] [ y / x ] ph <-> [ y / x ] [ y / z ] ph )
Theorem	sbco3xzyz 1847*	Version of sbco3 1848 with distinct variable constraints between x and z, and y and z. Lemma for proving sbco3 1848. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 22-Mar-2018.)
|- ( [ z / y ] [ y / x ] ph <-> [ z / x ] [ x / y ] ph )
Theorem	sbco3 1848	A composition law for substitution. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Proof rewritten by Jim Kingdon, 22-Mar-2018.)
|- ( [ z / y ] [ y / x ] ph <-> [ z / x ] [ x / y ] ph )
Theorem	sbcom 1849	A commutativity law for substitution. (Contributed by NM, 27-May-1997.) (Proof rewritten by Jim Kingdon, 22-Mar-2018.)
|- ( [ y / z ] [ y / x ] ph <-> [ y / x ] [ y / z ] ph )
Theorem	nfsbt 1850*	Closed form of nfsb 1822. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 9-May-2018.)
|- ( A. x F/ z ph -> F/ z [ y / x ] ph )
Theorem	nfsbd 1851*	Deduction version of nfsb 1822. (Contributed by NM, 15-Feb-2013.)
|- F/ x ph   &    |- ( ph -> F/ z ps )   =>    |- ( ph -> F/ z [ y / x ] ps )
Theorem	elsb3 1852*	Substitution applied to an atomic membership wff. (Contributed by NM, 7-Nov-2006.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 14-Jun-2011.)
|- ( [ x / y ] y e. z <-> x e. z )
Theorem	elsb4 1853*	Substitution applied to an atomic membership wff. (Contributed by Rodolfo Medina, 3-Apr-2010.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 14-Jun-2011.)
|- ( [ x / y ] z e. y <-> z e. x )
Theorem	sb9v 1854*	Like sb9 1855 but with a distinct variable constraint between x and y. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 28-Feb-2018.)
|- ( A. x [ x / y ] ph <-> A. y [ y / x ] ph )
Theorem	sb9 1855	Commutation of quantification and substitution variables. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Proof rewritten by Jim Kingdon, 23-Mar-2018.)
|- ( A. x [ x / y ] ph <-> A. y [ y / x ] ph )
Theorem	sb9i 1856	Commutation of quantification and substitution variables. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Proof rewritten by Jim Kingdon, 23-Mar-2018.)
|- ( A. x [ x / y ] ph -> A. y [ y / x ] ph )
Theorem	sbnf2 1857*	Two ways of expressing " x is (effectively) not free in ph." (Contributed by Gérard Lang, 14-Nov-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 6-Oct-2016.)
|- ( F/ x ph <-> A. y A. z ( [ y / x ] ph <-> [ z / x ] ph ) )
Theorem	hbsbd 1858*	Deduction version of hbsb 1823. (Contributed by NM, 15-Feb-2013.) (Proof rewritten by Jim Kingdon, 23-Mar-2018.)
|- ( ph -> A. x ph )   &    |- ( ph -> A. z ph )   &    |- ( ph -> ( ps -> A. z ps ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( [ y / x ] ps -> A. z [ y / x ] ps ) )
Theorem	2sb5 1859*	Equivalence for double substitution. (Contributed by NM, 3-Feb-2005.)
|- ( [ z / x ] [ w / y ] ph <-> E. x E. y ( ( x = z /\ y = w ) /\ ph ) )
Theorem	2sb6 1860*	Equivalence for double substitution. (Contributed by NM, 3-Feb-2005.)
|- ( [ z / x ] [ w / y ] ph <-> A. x A. y ( ( x = z /\ y = w ) -> ph ) )
Theorem	sbcom2v 1861*	Lemma for proving sbcom2 1863. It is the same as sbcom2 1863 but with additional distinct variable constraints on x and y, and on w and z. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 19-Feb-2018.)
|- ( [ w / z ] [ y / x ] ph <-> [ y / x ] [ w / z ] ph )
Theorem	sbcom2v2 1862*	Lemma for proving sbcom2 1863. It is the same as sbcom2v 1861 but removes the distinct variable constraint on x and y. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 19-Feb-2018.)
|- ( [ w / z ] [ y / x ] ph <-> [ y / x ] [ w / z ] ph )
Theorem	sbcom2 1863*	Commutativity law for substitution. Used in proof of Theorem 9.7 of [Megill] p. 449 (p. 16 of the preprint). (Contributed by NM, 27-May-1997.) (Proof modified to be intuitionistic by Jim Kingdon, 19-Feb-2018.)
|- ( [ w / z ] [ y / x ] ph <-> [ y / x ] [ w / z ] ph )
Theorem	sb6a 1864*	Equivalence for substitution. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
|- ( [ y / x ] ph <-> A. x ( x = y -> [ x / y ] ph ) )
Theorem	2sb5rf 1865*	Reversed double substitution. (Contributed by NM, 3-Feb-2005.)
|- ( ph -> A. z ph )   &    |- ( ph -> A. w ph )   =>    |- ( ph <-> E. z E. w ( ( z = x /\ w = y ) /\ [ z / x ] [ w / y ] ph ) )
Theorem	2sb6rf 1866*	Reversed double substitution. (Contributed by NM, 3-Feb-2005.)
|- ( ph -> A. z ph )   &    |- ( ph -> A. w ph )   =>    |- ( ph <-> A. z A. w ( ( z = x /\ w = y ) -> [ z / x ] [ w / y ] ph ) )
Theorem	dfsb7 1867*	An alternate definition of proper substitution df-sb 1646. By introducing a dummy variable z in the definiens, we are able to eliminate any distinct variable restrictions among the variables x, y, and ph of the definiendum. No distinct variable conflicts arise because z effectively insulates x from y. To achieve this, we use a chain of two substitutions in the form of sb5 1767, first z for x then y for z. Compare Definition 2.1'' of [Quine] p. 17. Theorem sb7f 1868 provides a version where ph and z don't have to be distinct. (Contributed by NM, 28-Jan-2004.)
|- ( [ y / x ] ph <-> E. z ( z = y /\ E. x ( x = z /\ ph ) ) )
Theorem	sb7f 1868*	This version of dfsb7 1867 does not require that ph and z be distinct. This permits it to be used as a definition for substitution in a formalization that omits the logically redundant axiom ax-17 1419 i.e. that doesn't have the concept of a variable not occurring in a wff. (df-sb 1646 is also suitable, but its mixing of free and bound variables is distasteful to some logicians.) (Contributed by NM, 26-Jul-2006.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 25-May-2011.)
|- ( ph -> A. z ph )   =>    |- ( [ y / x ] ph <-> E. z ( z = y /\ E. x ( x = z /\ ph ) ) )
Theorem	sb7af 1869*	An alternative definition of proper substitution df-sb 1646. Similar to dfsb7a 1870 but does not require that ph and z be distinct. Similar to sb7f 1868 in that it involves a dummy variable z, but expressed in terms of A. rather than E.. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 5-Feb-2018.)
|- F/ z ph   =>    |- ( [ y / x ] ph <-> A. z ( z = y -> A. x ( x = z -> ph ) ) )
Theorem	dfsb7a 1870*	An alternative definition of proper substitution df-sb 1646. Similar to dfsb7 1867 in that it involves a dummy variable z, but expressed in terms of A. rather than E.. For a version which only requires F/ z ph rather than z and ph being distinct, see sb7af 1869. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 5-Feb-2018.)
|- ( [ y / x ] ph <-> A. z ( z = y -> A. x ( x = z -> ph ) ) )
Theorem	sb10f 1871*	Hao Wang's identity axiom P6 in Irving Copi, Symbolic Logic (5th ed., 1979), p. 328. In traditional predicate calculus, this is a sole axiom for identity from which the usual ones can be derived. (Contributed by NM, 9-May-2005.)
|- ( ph -> A. x ph )   =>    |- ( [ y / z ] ph <-> E. x ( x = y /\ [ x / z ] ph ) )
Theorem	sbid2v 1872*	An identity law for substitution. Used in proof of Theorem 9.7 of [Megill] p. 449 (p. 16 of the preprint). (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
|- ( [ y / x ] [ x / y ] ph <-> ph )
Theorem	sbelx 1873*	Elimination of substitution. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
|- ( ph <-> E. x ( x = y /\ [ x / y ] ph ) )
Theorem	sbel2x 1874*	Elimination of double substitution. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
|- ( ph <-> E. x E. y ( ( x = z /\ y = w ) /\ [ y / w ] [ x / z ] ph ) )
Theorem	sbalyz 1875*	Move universal quantifier in and out of substitution. Identical to sbal 1876 except that it has an additional distinct variable constraint on y and z. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 29-Dec-2017.)
|- ( [ z / y ] A. x ph <-> A. x [ z / y ] ph )
Theorem	sbal 1876*	Move universal quantifier in and out of substitution. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Proof rewritten by Jim Kingdon, 12-Feb-2018.)
|- ( [ z / y ] A. x ph <-> A. x [ z / y ] ph )
Theorem	sbal1yz 1877*	Lemma for proving sbal1 1878. Same as sbal1 1878 but with an additional distinct variable constraint on y and z. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 23-Feb-2018.)
|- ( -. A. x x = z -> ( [ z / y ] A. x ph <-> A. x [ z / y ] ph ) )
Theorem	sbal1 1878*	A theorem used in elimination of disjoint variable restriction on x and y by replacing it with a distinctor -. A. x x = z. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Proof rewitten by Jim Kingdon, 24-Feb-2018.)
|- ( -. A. x x = z -> ( [ z / y ] A. x ph <-> A. x [ z / y ] ph ) )
Theorem	sbexyz 1879*	Move existential quantifier in and out of substitution. Identical to sbex 1880 except that it has an additional distinct variable constraint on y and z. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 29-Dec-2017.)
|- ( [ z / y ] E. x ph <-> E. x [ z / y ] ph )
Theorem	sbex 1880*	Move existential quantifier in and out of substitution. (Contributed by NM, 27-Sep-2003.) (Proof rewritten by Jim Kingdon, 12-Feb-2018.)
|- ( [ z / y ] E. x ph <-> E. x [ z / y ] ph )
Theorem	sbalv 1881*	Quantify with new variable inside substitution. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-1993.)
|- ( [ y / x ] ph <-> ps )   =>    |- ( [ y / x ] A. z ph <-> A. z ps )
Theorem	sbco4lem 1882*	Lemma for sbco4 1883. It replaces the temporary variable v with another temporary variable w. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 26-Sep-2018.)
|- ( [ x / v ] [ y / x ] [ v / y ] ph <-> [ x / w ] [ y / x ] [ w / y ] ph )
Theorem	sbco4 1883*	Two ways of exchanging two variables. Both sides of the biconditional exchange x and y, either via two temporary variables u and v, or a single temporary w. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 25-Sep-2018.)
|- ( [ y / u ] [ x / v ] [ u / x ] [ v / y ] ph <-> [ x / w ] [ y / x ] [ w / y ] ph )
Theorem	exsb 1884*	An equivalent expression for existence. (Contributed by NM, 2-Feb-2005.)
|- ( E. x ph <-> E. y A. x ( x = y -> ph ) )
Theorem	2exsb 1885*	An equivalent expression for double existence. (Contributed by NM, 2-Feb-2005.)
|- ( E. x E. y ph <-> E. z E. w A. x A. y ( ( x = z /\ y = w ) -> ph ) )
Theorem	dvelimALT 1886*	Version of dvelim 1893 that doesn't use ax-10 1396. Because it has different distinct variable constraints than dvelim 1893 and is used in important proofs, it would be better if it had a name which does not end in ALT (ideally more close to set.mm naming). (Contributed by NM, 17-May-2008.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( ph -> A. x ph )   &    |- ( z = y -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( -. A. x x = y -> ( ps -> A. x ps ) )
Theorem	dvelimfv 1887*	Like dvelimf 1891 but with a distinct variable constraint on x and z. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 6-Mar-2018.)
|- ( ph -> A. x ph )   &    |- ( ps -> A. z ps )   &    |- ( z = y -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( -. A. x x = y -> ( ps -> A. x ps ) )
Theorem	hbsb4 1888	A variable not free remains so after substitution with a distinct variable. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Proof rewritten by Jim Kingdon, 23-Mar-2018.)
|- ( ph -> A. z ph )   =>    |- ( -. A. z z = y -> ( [ y / x ] ph -> A. z [ y / x ] ph ) )
Theorem	hbsb4t 1889	A variable not free remains so after substitution with a distinct variable (closed form of hbsb4 1888). (Contributed by NM, 7-Apr-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 25-May-2011.)
|- ( A. x A. z ( ph -> A. z ph ) -> ( -. A. z z = y -> ( [ y / x ] ph -> A. z [ y / x ] ph ) ) )
Theorem	nfsb4t 1890	A variable not free remains so after substitution with a distinct variable (closed form of hbsb4 1888). (Contributed by NM, 7-Apr-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 4-Oct-2016.) (Proof rewritten by Jim Kingdon, 9-May-2018.)
|- ( A. x F/ z ph -> ( -. A. z z = y -> F/ z [ y / x ] ph ) )
Theorem	dvelimf 1891	Version of dvelim 1893 without any variable restrictions. (Contributed by NM, 1-Oct-2002.)
|- ( ph -> A. x ph )   &    |- ( ps -> A. z ps )   &    |- ( z = y -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( -. A. x x = y -> ( ps -> A. x ps ) )
Theorem	dvelimdf 1892	Deduction form of dvelimf 1891. This version may be useful if we want to avoid ax-17 1419 and use ax-16 1695 instead. (Contributed by NM, 7-Apr-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 6-Oct-2016.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 11-May-2018.)
|- F/ x ph   &    |- F/ z ph   &    |- ( ph -> F/ x ps )   &    |- ( ph -> F/ z ch )   &    |- ( ph -> ( z = y -> ( ps <-> ch ) ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( -. A. x x = y -> F/ x ch ) )
Theorem	dvelim 1893*	This theorem can be used to eliminate a distinct variable restriction on x and z and replace it with the "distinctor" -. A. x x = y as an antecedent. ph normally has z free and can be read ph ( z ), and ps substitutes y for z and can be read ph ( y ). We don't require that x and y be distinct: if they aren't, the distinctor will become false (in multiple-element domains of discourse) and "protect" the consequent. To obtain a closed-theorem form of this inference, prefix the hypotheses with A. x A. z, conjoin them, and apply dvelimdf 1892. Other variants of this theorem are dvelimf 1891 (with no distinct variable restrictions) and dvelimALT 1886 (that avoids ax-10 1396). (Contributed by NM, 23-Nov-1994.)
|- ( ph -> A. x ph )   &    |- ( z = y -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( -. A. x x = y -> ( ps -> A. x ps ) )
Theorem	dvelimor 1894*	Disjunctive distinct variable constraint elimination. A user of this theorem starts with a formula ph (containing z) and a distinct variable constraint between x and z. The theorem makes it possible to replace the distinct variable constraint with the disjunct A. x x = y ( ps is just a version of ph with y substituted for z). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 11-May-2018.)
|- F/ x ph   &    |- ( z = y -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( A. x x = y \/ F/ x ps )
Theorem	dveeq1 1895*	Quantifier introduction when one pair of variables is distinct. (Contributed by NM, 2-Jan-2002.) (Proof rewritten by Jim Kingdon, 19-Feb-2018.)
|- ( -. A. x x = y -> ( y = z -> A. x y = z ) )
Theorem	dveel1 1896*	Quantifier introduction when one pair of variables is distinct. (Contributed by NM, 2-Jan-2002.)
|- ( -. A. x x = y -> ( y e. z -> A. x y e. z ) )
Theorem	dveel2 1897*	Quantifier introduction when one pair of variables is distinct. (Contributed by NM, 2-Jan-2002.)
|- ( -. A. x x = y -> ( z e. y -> A. x z e. y ) )
Theorem	sbal2 1898*	Move quantifier in and out of substitution. (Contributed by NM, 2-Jan-2002.)
|- ( -. A. x x = y -> ( [ z / y ] A. x ph <-> A. x [ z / y ] ph ) )
Theorem	nfsb4or 1899	A variable not free remains so after substitution with a distinct variable. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 11-May-2018.)
|- F/ z ph   =>    |- ( A. z z = y \/ F/ z [ y / x ] ph )
1.4.6  Existential uniqueness
Syntax	weu 1900	Extend wff definition to include existential uniqueness ("there exists a unique x such that ph").
wff E! x ph