P. 17 of Theorem List - Intuitionistic Logic Explorer

Theorem List for Intuitionistic Logic Explorer - 1601-1700   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	elequ2 1601	An identity law for the non-logical predicate. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
|- ( x = y -> ( z e. x <-> z e. y ) )
Theorem	ax11i 1602	Inference that has ax-11 1397 (without A. y) as its conclusion and doesn't require ax-10 1396, ax-11 1397, or ax-12 1402 for its proof. The hypotheses may be eliminable without one or more of these axioms in special cases. Proof similar to Lemma 16 of [Tarski] p. 70. (Contributed by NM, 20-May-2008.)
|- ( x = y -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- ( ps -> A. x ps )   =>    |- ( x = y -> ( ph -> A. x ( x = y -> ph ) ) )
1.3.9  Axioms ax-10 and ax-11
Theorem	ax10o 1603	Show that ax-10o 1604 can be derived from ax-10 1396. An open problem is whether this theorem can be derived from ax-10 1396 and the others when ax-11 1397 is replaced with ax-11o 1704. See theorem ax10 1605 for the rederivation of ax-10 1396 from ax10o 1603. Normally, ax10o 1603 should be used rather than ax-10o 1604, except by theorems specifically studying the latter's properties. (Contributed by NM, 16-May-2008.)
|- ( A. x x = y -> ( A. x ph -> A. y ph ) )
Axiom	ax-10o 1604	Axiom ax-10o 1604 ("o" for "old") was the original version of ax-10 1396, before it was discovered (in May 2008) that the shorter ax-10 1396 could replace it. It appears as Axiom scheme C11' in [Megill] p. 448 (p. 16 of the preprint). This axiom is redundant, as shown by theorem ax10o 1603. Normally, ax10o 1603 should be used rather than ax-10o 1604, except by theorems specifically studying the latter's properties. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( A. x x = y -> ( A. x ph -> A. y ph ) )
Theorem	ax10 1605	Rederivation of ax-10 1396 from original version ax-10o 1604. See theorem ax10o 1603 for the derivation of ax-10o 1604 from ax-10 1396. This theorem should not be referenced in any proof. Instead, use ax-10 1396 above so that uses of ax-10 1396 can be more easily identified. (Contributed by NM, 16-May-2008.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( A. x x = y -> A. y y = x )
Theorem	hbae 1606	All variables are effectively bound in an identical variable specifier. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Revised by NM, 3-Feb-2015.)
|- ( A. x x = y -> A. z A. x x = y )
Theorem	nfae 1607	All variables are effectively bound in an identical variable specifier. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)
|- F/ z A. x x = y
Theorem	hbaes 1608	Rule that applies hbae 1606 to antecedent. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
|- ( A. z A. x x = y -> ph )   =>    |- ( A. x x = y -> ph )
Theorem	hbnae 1609	All variables are effectively bound in a distinct variable specifier. Lemma L19 in [Megill] p. 446 (p. 14 of the preprint). (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
|- ( -. A. x x = y -> A. z -. A. x x = y )
Theorem	nfnae 1610	All variables are effectively bound in a distinct variable specifier. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)
|- F/ z -. A. x x = y
Theorem	hbnaes 1611	Rule that applies hbnae 1609 to antecedent. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
|- ( A. z -. A. x x = y -> ph )   =>    |- ( -. A. x x = y -> ph )
Theorem	naecoms 1612	A commutation rule for distinct variable specifiers. (Contributed by NM, 2-Jan-2002.)
|- ( -. A. x x = y -> ph )   =>    |- ( -. A. y y = x -> ph )
Theorem	equs4 1613	Lemma used in proofs of substitution properties. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 20-May-2014.)
|- ( A. x ( x = y -> ph ) -> E. x ( x = y /\ ph ) )
Theorem	equsalh 1614	A useful equivalence related to substitution. New proofs should use equsal 1615 instead. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 12-Aug-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( ps -> A. x ps )   &    |- ( x = y -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( A. x ( x = y -> ph ) <-> ps )
Theorem	equsal 1615	A useful equivalence related to substitution. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 12-Aug-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 3-Oct-2016.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 5-Feb-2018.)
|- F/ x ps   &    |- ( x = y -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( A. x ( x = y -> ph ) <-> ps )
Theorem	equsex 1616	A useful equivalence related to substitution. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Revised by NM, 3-Feb-2015.)
|- ( ps -> A. x ps )   &    |- ( x = y -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( E. x ( x = y /\ ph ) <-> ps )
Theorem	equsexd 1617	Deduction form of equsex 1616. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 29-Dec-2017.)
|- ( ph -> A. x ph )   &    |- ( ph -> ( ch -> A. x ch ) )   &    |- ( ph -> ( x = y -> ( ps <-> ch ) ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( E. x ( x = y /\ ps ) <-> ch ) )
Theorem	dral1 1618	Formula-building lemma for use with the Distinctor Reduction Theorem. Part of Theorem 9.4 of [Megill] p. 448 (p. 16 of preprint). (Contributed by NM, 24-Nov-1994.)
|- ( A. x x = y -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( A. x x = y -> ( A. x ph <-> A. y ps ) )
Theorem	dral2 1619	Formula-building lemma for use with the Distinctor Reduction Theorem. Part of Theorem 9.4 of [Megill] p. 448 (p. 16 of preprint). (Contributed by NM, 27-Feb-2005.)
|- ( A. x x = y -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( A. x x = y -> ( A. z ph <-> A. z ps ) )
Theorem	drex2 1620	Formula-building lemma for use with the Distinctor Reduction Theorem. Part of Theorem 9.4 of [Megill] p. 448 (p. 16 of preprint). (Contributed by NM, 27-Feb-2005.)
|- ( A. x x = y -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( A. x x = y -> ( E. z ph <-> E. z ps ) )
Theorem	drnf1 1621	Formula-building lemma for use with the Distinctor Reduction Theorem. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Oct-2016.)
|- ( A. x x = y -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( A. x x = y -> ( F/ x ph <-> F/ y ps ) )
Theorem	drnf2 1622	Formula-building lemma for use with the Distinctor Reduction Theorem. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Oct-2016.)
|- ( A. x x = y -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( A. x x = y -> ( F/ z ph <-> F/ z ps ) )
Theorem	spimth 1623	Closed theorem form of spim 1626. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jan-2008.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( A. x ( ( ps -> A. x ps ) /\ ( x = y -> ( ph -> ps ) ) ) -> ( A. x ph -> ps ) )
Theorem	spimt 1624	Closed theorem form of spim 1626. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jan-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 17-Oct-2016.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 24-Feb-2018.)
|- ( ( F/ x ps /\ A. x ( x = y -> ( ph -> ps ) ) ) -> ( A. x ph -> ps ) )
Theorem	spimh 1625	Specialization, using implicit substitition. Compare Lemma 14 of [Tarski] p. 70. The spim 1626 series of theorems requires that only one direction of the substitution hypothesis hold. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Revised by NM, 8-May-2008.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( ps -> A. x ps )   &    |- ( x = y -> ( ph -> ps ) )   =>    |- ( A. x ph -> ps )
Theorem	spim 1626	Specialization, using implicit substitution. Compare Lemma 14 of [Tarski] p. 70. The spim 1626 series of theorems requires that only one direction of the substitution hypothesis hold. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 3-Oct-2016.) (Proof rewritten by Jim Kingdon, 10-Jun-2018.)
|- F/ x ps   &    |- ( x = y -> ( ph -> ps ) )   =>    |- ( A. x ph -> ps )
Theorem	spimeh 1627	Existential introduction, using implicit substitition. Compare Lemma 14 of [Tarski] p. 70. (Contributed by NM, 7-Aug-1994.) (Revised by NM, 3-Feb-2015.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( ph -> A. x ph )   &    |- ( x = y -> ( ph -> ps ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> E. x ps )
Theorem	spimed 1628	Deduction version of spime 1629. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 3-Oct-2016.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 19-Feb-2018.)
|- ( ch -> F/ x ph )   &    |- ( x = y -> ( ph -> ps ) )   =>    |- ( ch -> ( ph -> E. x ps ) )
Theorem	spime 1629	Existential introduction, using implicit substitution. Compare Lemma 14 of [Tarski] p. 70. (Contributed by NM, 7-Aug-1994.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 3-Oct-2016.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 6-Mar-2018.)
|- F/ x ph   &    |- ( x = y -> ( ph -> ps ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> E. x ps )
Theorem	cbv3 1630	Rule used to change bound variables, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 12-May-2018.)
|- F/ y ph   &    |- F/ x ps   &    |- ( x = y -> ( ph -> ps ) )   =>    |- ( A. x ph -> A. y ps )
Theorem	cbv3h 1631	Rule used to change bound variables, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 25-May-2011.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 12-May-2018.)
|- ( ph -> A. y ph )   &    |- ( ps -> A. x ps )   &    |- ( x = y -> ( ph -> ps ) )   =>    |- ( A. x ph -> A. y ps )
Theorem	cbv1 1632	Rule used to change bound variables, using implicit substitution. Revised to format hypotheses to common style. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 3-Oct-2016.) (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 13-May-2018.)
|- F/ x ph   &    |- F/ y ph   &    |- ( ph -> F/ y ps )   &    |- ( ph -> F/ x ch )   &    |- ( ph -> ( x = y -> ( ps -> ch ) ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( A. x ps -> A. y ch ) )
Theorem	cbv1h 1633	Rule used to change bound variables, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 13-May-2018.)
|- ( ph -> ( ps -> A. y ps ) )   &    |- ( ph -> ( ch -> A. x ch ) )   &    |- ( ph -> ( x = y -> ( ps -> ch ) ) )   =>    |- ( A. x A. y ph -> ( A. x ps -> A. y ch ) )
Theorem	cbv2h 1634	Rule used to change bound variables, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
|- ( ph -> ( ps -> A. y ps ) )   &    |- ( ph -> ( ch -> A. x ch ) )   &    |- ( ph -> ( x = y -> ( ps <-> ch ) ) )   =>    |- ( A. x A. y ph -> ( A. x ps <-> A. y ch ) )
Theorem	cbv2 1635	Rule used to change bound variables, using implicit substitution. Revised to align format of hypotheses to common style. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 3-Oct-2016.) (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 13-May-2018.)
|- F/ x ph   &    |- F/ y ph   &    |- ( ph -> F/ y ps )   &    |- ( ph -> F/ x ch )   &    |- ( ph -> ( x = y -> ( ps <-> ch ) ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( A. x ps <-> A. y ch ) )
Theorem	cbvalh 1636	Rule used to change bound variables, using implicit substitition. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 25-May-2011.)
|- ( ph -> A. y ph )   &    |- ( ps -> A. x ps )   &    |- ( x = y -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( A. x ph <-> A. y ps )
Theorem	cbval 1637	Rule used to change bound variables, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 3-Oct-2016.)
|- F/ y ph   &    |- F/ x ps   &    |- ( x = y -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( A. x ph <-> A. y ps )
Theorem	cbvexh 1638	Rule used to change bound variables, using implicit substitition. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 3-Feb-2015.)
|- ( ph -> A. y ph )   &    |- ( ps -> A. x ps )   &    |- ( x = y -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( E. x ph <-> E. y ps )
Theorem	cbvex 1639	Rule used to change bound variables, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
|- F/ y ph   &    |- F/ x ps   &    |- ( x = y -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( E. x ph <-> E. y ps )
Theorem	chvar 1640	Implicit substitution of y for x into a theorem. (Contributed by Raph Levien, 9-Jul-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 3-Oct-2016.)
|- F/ x ps   &    |- ( x = y -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- ph   =>    |- ps
Theorem	equvini 1641	A variable introduction law for equality. Lemma 15 of [Monk2] p. 109, however we do not require z to be distinct from x and y (making the proof longer). (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 25-May-2011.)
|- ( x = y -> E. z ( x = z /\ z = y ) )
Theorem	equveli 1642	A variable elimination law for equality with no distinct variable requirements. (Compare equvini 1641.) (Contributed by NM, 1-Mar-2013.) (Revised by NM, 3-Feb-2015.)
|- ( A. z ( z = x <-> z = y ) -> x = y )
Theorem	nfald 1643	If x is not free in ph, it is not free in A. y ph. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Sep-2016.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 6-Jan-2018.)
|- F/ y ph   &    |- ( ph -> F/ x ps )   =>    |- ( ph -> F/ x A. y ps )
Theorem	nfexd 1644	If x is not free in ph, it is not free in E. y ph. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Sep-2016.) (Proof rewritten by Jim Kingdon, 7-Feb-2018.)
|- F/ y ph   &    |- ( ph -> F/ x ps )   =>    |- ( ph -> F/ x E. y ps )
1.3.10  Substitution (without distinct variables)
Syntax	wsb 1645	Extend wff definition to include proper substitution (read "the wff that results when y is properly substituted for x in wff ph"). (Contributed by NM, 24-Jan-2006.)
wff [ y / x ] ph
Definition	df-sb 1646	Define proper substitution. Remark 9.1 in [Megill] p. 447 (p. 15 of the preprint). For our notation, we use [ y / x ] ph to mean "the wff that results when y is properly substituted for x in the wff ph." We can also use [ y / x ] ph in place of the "free for" side condition used in traditional predicate calculus; see, for example, stdpc4 1658. Our notation was introduced in Haskell B. Curry's Foundations of Mathematical Logic (1977), p. 316 and is frequently used in textbooks of lambda calculus and combinatory logic. This notation improves the common but ambiguous notation, " ph ( y ) is the wff that results when y is properly substituted for x in ph ( x )." For example, if the original ph ( x ) is x = y, then ph ( y ) is y = y, from which we obtain that ph ( x ) is x = x. So what exactly does ph ( x ) mean? Curry's notation solves this problem. In most books, proper substitution has a somewhat complicated recursive definition with multiple cases based on the occurrences of free and bound variables in the wff. Instead, we use a single formula that is exactly equivalent and gives us a direct definition. We later prove that our definition has the properties we expect of proper substitution (see theorems sbequ 1721, sbcom2 1863 and sbid2v 1872). Note that our definition is valid even when x and y are replaced with the same variable, as sbid 1657 shows. We achieve this by having x free in the first conjunct and bound in the second. We can also achieve this by using a dummy variable, as the alternate definition dfsb7 1867 shows (which some logicians may prefer because it doesn't mix free and bound variables). Another alternate definition which uses a dummy variable is dfsb7a 1870. When x and y are distinct, we can express proper substitution with the simpler expressions of sb5 1767 and sb6 1766. In classical logic, another possible definition is ( x = y /\ ph ) \/ A. x ( x = y -> ph ) but we do not have an intuitionistic proof that this is equivalent. There are no restrictions on any of the variables, including what variables may occur in wff ph. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
|- ( [ y / x ] ph <-> ( ( x = y -> ph ) /\ E. x ( x = y /\ ph ) ) )
Theorem	sbimi 1647	Infer substitution into antecedent and consequent of an implication. (Contributed by NM, 25-Jun-1998.)
|- ( ph -> ps )   =>    |- ( [ y / x ] ph -> [ y / x ] ps )
Theorem	sbbii 1648	Infer substitution into both sides of a logical equivalence. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
|- ( ph <-> ps )   =>    |- ( [ y / x ] ph <-> [ y / x ] ps )
Theorem	sb1 1649	One direction of a simplified definition of substitution. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
|- ( [ y / x ] ph -> E. x ( x = y /\ ph ) )
Theorem	sb2 1650	One direction of a simplified definition of substitution. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
|- ( A. x ( x = y -> ph ) -> [ y / x ] ph )
Theorem	sbequ1 1651	An equality theorem for substitution. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
|- ( x = y -> ( ph -> [ y / x ] ph ) )
Theorem	sbequ2 1652	An equality theorem for substitution. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
|- ( x = y -> ( [ y / x ] ph -> ph ) )
Theorem	stdpc7 1653	One of the two equality axioms of standard predicate calculus, called substitutivity of equality. (The other one is stdpc6 1591.) Translated to traditional notation, it can be read: " x = y -> ( ph ( x, x ) -> ph ( x, y ) ), provided that y is free for x in ph ( x, y )." Axiom 7 of [Mendelson] p. 95. (Contributed by NM, 15-Feb-2005.)
|- ( x = y -> ( [ x / y ] ph -> ph ) )
Theorem	sbequ12 1654	An equality theorem for substitution. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
|- ( x = y -> ( ph <-> [ y / x ] ph ) )
Theorem	sbequ12r 1655	An equality theorem for substitution. (Contributed by NM, 6-Oct-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 21-Jun-2011.)
|- ( x = y -> ( [ x / y ] ph <-> ph ) )
Theorem	sbequ12a 1656	An equality theorem for substitution. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
|- ( x = y -> ( [ y / x ] ph <-> [ x / y ] ph ) )
Theorem	sbid 1657	An identity theorem for substitution. Remark 9.1 in [Megill] p. 447 (p. 15 of the preprint). (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
|- ( [ x / x ] ph <-> ph )
Theorem	stdpc4 1658	The specialization axiom of standard predicate calculus. It states that if a statement ph holds for all x, then it also holds for the specific case of y (properly) substituted for x. Translated to traditional notation, it can be read: " A. x ph ( x ) -> ph ( y ), provided that y is free for x in ph ( x )." Axiom 4 of [Mendelson] p. 69. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
|- ( A. x ph -> [ y / x ] ph )
Theorem	sbh 1659	Substitution for a variable not free in a wff does not affect it. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Revised by NM, 17-Oct-2004.)
|- ( ph -> A. x ph )   =>    |- ( [ y / x ] ph <-> ph )
Theorem	sbf 1660	Substitution for a variable not free in a wff does not affect it. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 4-Oct-2016.)
|- F/ x ph   =>    |- ( [ y / x ] ph <-> ph )
Theorem	sbf2 1661	Substitution has no effect on a bound variable. (Contributed by NM, 1-Jul-2005.)
|- ( [ y / x ] A. x ph <-> A. x ph )
Theorem	sb6x 1662	Equivalence involving substitution for a variable not free. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 12-Aug-2011.)
|- ( ph -> A. x ph )   =>    |- ( [ y / x ] ph <-> A. x ( x = y -> ph ) )
Theorem	nfs1f 1663	If x is not free in ph, it is not free in [ y / x ] ph. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)
|- F/ x ph   =>    |- F/ x [ y / x ] ph
Theorem	hbs1f 1664	If x is not free in ph, it is not free in [ y / x ] ph. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 25-May-2011.)
|- ( ph -> A. x ph )   =>    |- ( [ y / x ] ph -> A. x [ y / x ] ph )
Theorem	sbequ5 1665	Substitution does not change an identical variable specifier. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Revised by NM, 21-Dec-2004.)
|- ( [ w / z ] A. x x = y <-> A. x x = y )
Theorem	sbequ6 1666	Substitution does not change a distinctor. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Revised by NM, 14-May-2005.)
|- ( [ w / z ] -. A. x x = y <-> -. A. x x = y )
Theorem	sbt 1667	A substitution into a theorem remains true. (See chvar 1640 and chvarv 1812 for versions using implicit substitition.) (Contributed by NM, 21-Jan-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 25-May-2011.)
|- ph   =>    |- [ y / x ] ph
Theorem	equsb1 1668	Substitution applied to an atomic wff. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
|- [ y / x ] x = y
Theorem	equsb2 1669	Substitution applied to an atomic wff. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
|- [ y / x ] y = x
Theorem	sbiedh 1670	Conversion of implicit substitution to explicit substitution (deduction version of sbieh 1673). New proofs should use sbied 1671 instead. (Contributed by NM, 30-Jun-1994.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 25-May-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( ph -> A. x ph )   &    |- ( ph -> ( ch -> A. x ch ) )   &    |- ( ph -> ( x = y -> ( ps <-> ch ) ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( [ y / x ] ps <-> ch ) )
Theorem	sbied 1671	Conversion of implicit substitution to explicit substitution (deduction version of sbie 1674). (Contributed by NM, 30-Jun-1994.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 4-Oct-2016.)
|- F/ x ph   &    |- ( ph -> F/ x ch )   &    |- ( ph -> ( x = y -> ( ps <-> ch ) ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( [ y / x ] ps <-> ch ) )
Theorem	sbiedv 1672*	Conversion of implicit substitution to explicit substitution (deduction version of sbie 1674). (Contributed by NM, 7-Jan-2017.)
|- ( ( ph /\ x = y ) -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( [ y / x ] ps <-> ch ) )
Theorem	sbieh 1673	Conversion of implicit substitution to explicit substitution. New proofs should use sbie 1674 instead. (Contributed by NM, 30-Jun-1994.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( ps -> A. x ps )   &    |- ( x = y -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( [ y / x ] ph <-> ps )
Theorem	sbie 1674	Conversion of implicit substitution to explicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 30-Jun-1994.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 4-Oct-2016.) (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 30-Apr-2018.)
|- F/ x ps   &    |- ( x = y -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( [ y / x ] ph <-> ps )
1.3.11  Theorems using axiom ax-11
Theorem	equs5a 1675	A property related to substitution that unlike equs5 1710 doesn't require a distinctor antecedent. (Contributed by NM, 2-Feb-2007.)
|- ( E. x ( x = y /\ A. y ph ) -> A. x ( x = y -> ph ) )
Theorem	equs5e 1676	A property related to substitution that unlike equs5 1710 doesn't require a distinctor antecedent. (Contributed by NM, 2-Feb-2007.) (Revised by NM, 3-Feb-2015.)
|- ( E. x ( x = y /\ ph ) -> A. x ( x = y -> E. y ph ) )
Theorem	ax11e 1677	Analogue to ax-11 1397 but for existential quantification. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro and Jim Kingdon, 31-Dec-2017.) (Proved by Mario Carneiro, 9-Feb-2018.)
|- ( x = y -> ( E. x ( x = y /\ ph ) -> E. y ph ) )
Theorem	ax10oe 1678	Quantifier Substitution for existential quantifiers. Analogue to ax10o 1603 but for E. rather than A.. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 21-Dec-2017.)
|- ( A. x x = y -> ( E. x ps -> E. y ps ) )
Theorem	drex1 1679	Formula-building lemma for use with the Distinctor Reduction Theorem. Part of Theorem 9.4 of [Megill] p. 448 (p. 16 of preprint). (Contributed by NM, 27-Feb-2005.) (Revised by NM, 3-Feb-2015.)
|- ( A. x x = y -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( A. x x = y -> ( E. x ph <-> E. y ps ) )
Theorem	drsb1 1680	Formula-building lemma for use with the Distinctor Reduction Theorem. Part of Theorem 9.4 of [Megill] p. 448 (p. 16 of preprint). (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
|- ( A. x x = y -> ( [ z / x ] ph <-> [ z / y ] ph ) )
Theorem	exdistrfor 1681	Distribution of existential quantifiers, with a bound-variable hypothesis saying that y is not free in ph, but x can be free in ph (and there is no distinct variable condition on x and y). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 25-Feb-2018.)
|- ( A. x x = y \/ A. x F/ y ph )   =>    |- ( E. x E. y ( ph /\ ps ) -> E. x ( ph /\ E. y ps ) )
Theorem	sb4a 1682	A version of sb4 1713 that doesn't require a distinctor antecedent. (Contributed by NM, 2-Feb-2007.)
|- ( [ y / x ] A. y ph -> A. x ( x = y -> ph ) )
Theorem	equs45f 1683	Two ways of expressing substitution when y is not free in ph. (Contributed by NM, 25-Apr-2008.)
|- ( ph -> A. y ph )   =>    |- ( E. x ( x = y /\ ph ) <-> A. x ( x = y -> ph ) )
Theorem	sb6f 1684	Equivalence for substitution when y is not free in ph. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Revised by NM, 30-Apr-2008.)
|- ( ph -> A. y ph )   =>    |- ( [ y / x ] ph <-> A. x ( x = y -> ph ) )
Theorem	sb5f 1685	Equivalence for substitution when y is not free in ph. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Revised by NM, 18-May-2008.)
|- ( ph -> A. y ph )   =>    |- ( [ y / x ] ph <-> E. x ( x = y /\ ph ) )
Theorem	sb4e 1686	One direction of a simplified definition of substitution that unlike sb4 1713 doesn't require a distinctor antecedent. (Contributed by NM, 2-Feb-2007.)
|- ( [ y / x ] ph -> A. x ( x = y -> E. y ph ) )
Theorem	hbsb2a 1687	Special case of a bound-variable hypothesis builder for substitution. (Contributed by NM, 2-Feb-2007.)
|- ( [ y / x ] A. y ph -> A. x [ y / x ] ph )
Theorem	hbsb2e 1688	Special case of a bound-variable hypothesis builder for substitution. (Contributed by NM, 2-Feb-2007.)
|- ( [ y / x ] ph -> A. x [ y / x ] E. y ph )
Theorem	hbsb3 1689	If y is not free in ph, x is not free in [ y / x ] ph. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
|- ( ph -> A. y ph )   =>    |- ( [ y / x ] ph -> A. x [ y / x ] ph )
Theorem	nfs1 1690	If y is not free in ph, x is not free in [ y / x ] ph. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)
|- F/ y ph   =>    |- F/ x [ y / x ] ph
Theorem	sbcof2 1691	Version of sbco 1842 where x is not free in ph. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 28-Dec-2017.)
|- ( ph -> A. x ph )   =>    |- ( [ y / x ] [ x / y ] ph <-> [ y / x ] ph )
1.4  Predicate calculus with distinct variables
1.4.1  Derive the axiom of distinct variables ax-16
Theorem	spimv 1692*	A version of spim 1626 with a distinct variable requirement instead of a bound variable hypothesis. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
|- ( x = y -> ( ph -> ps ) )   =>    |- ( A. x ph -> ps )
Theorem	aev 1693*	A "distinctor elimination" lemma with no restrictions on variables in the consequent, proved without using ax-16 1695. (Contributed by NM, 8-Nov-2006.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 21-Jun-2011.)
|- ( A. x x = y -> A. z w = v )
Theorem	ax16 1694*	Theorem showing that ax-16 1695 is redundant if ax-17 1419 is included in the axiom system. The important part of the proof is provided by aev 1693. See ax16ALT 1739 for an alternate proof that does not require ax-10 1396 or ax-12 1402. This theorem should not be referenced in any proof. Instead, use ax-16 1695 below so that theorems needing ax-16 1695 can be more easily identified. (Contributed by NM, 8-Nov-2006.)
|- ( A. x x = y -> ( ph -> A. x ph ) )
Axiom	ax-16 1695*	Axiom of Distinct Variables. The only axiom of predicate calculus requiring that variables be distinct (if we consider ax-17 1419 to be a metatheorem and not an axiom). Axiom scheme C16' in [Megill] p. 448 (p. 16 of the preprint). It apparently does not otherwise appear in the literature but is easily proved from textbook predicate calculus by cases. It is a somewhat bizarre axiom since the antecedent is always false in set theory, but nonetheless it is technically necessary as you can see from its uses. This axiom is redundant if we include ax-17 1419; see theorem ax16 1694. This axiom is obsolete and should no longer be used. It is proved above as theorem ax16 1694. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( A. x x = y -> ( ph -> A. x ph ) )
Theorem	dveeq2 1696*	Quantifier introduction when one pair of variables is distinct. (Contributed by NM, 2-Jan-2002.)
|- ( -. A. x x = y -> ( z = y -> A. x z = y ) )
Theorem	dveeq2or 1697*	Quantifier introduction when one pair of variables is distinct. Like dveeq2 1696 but connecting A. x x = y by a disjunction rather than negation and implication makes the theorem stronger in intuitionistic logic. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 1-Feb-2018.)
|- ( A. x x = y \/ F/ x z = y )
Theorem	dvelimfALT2 1698*	Proof of dvelimf 1891 using dveeq2 1696 (shown as the last hypothesis) instead of ax-12 1402. This shows that ax-12 1402 could be replaced by dveeq2 1696 (the last hypothesis). (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 21-Jul-2011.)
|- ( ph -> A. x ph )   &    |- ( ps -> A. z ps )   &    |- ( z = y -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- ( -. A. x x = y -> ( z = y -> A. x z = y ) )   =>    |- ( -. A. x x = y -> ( ps -> A. x ps ) )
Theorem	nd5 1699*	A lemma for proving conditionless ZFC axioms. (Contributed by NM, 8-Jan-2002.)
|- ( -. A. y y = x -> ( z = y -> A. x z = y ) )
Theorem	exlimdv 1700*	Deduction from Theorem 19.23 of [Margaris] p. 90. (Contributed by NM, 27-Apr-1994.)
|- ( ph -> ( ps -> ch ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( E. x ps -> ch ) )