Home | Intuitionistic Logic Explorer Theorem List (p. 49 of 102) | < Previous Next > |
Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > ILE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
Type | Label | Description |
---|---|---|
Statement | ||
Theorem | rnsnop 4801 | The range of a singleton of an ordered pair is the singleton of the second member. (Contributed by NM, 24-Jul-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ ran {⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩} = {𝐵} | ||
Theorem | op1sta 4802 | Extract the first member of an ordered pair. (See op2nda 4805 to extract the second member and op1stb 4209 for an alternate version.) (Contributed by Raph Levien, 4-Dec-2003.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ ∪ dom {⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩} = 𝐴 | ||
Theorem | cnvsn 4803 | Converse of a singleton of an ordered pair. (Contributed by NM, 11-May-1998.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ ^{◡}{⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩} = {⟨𝐵, 𝐴⟩} | ||
Theorem | op2ndb 4804 | Extract the second member of an ordered pair. Theorem 5.12(ii) of [Monk1] p. 52. (See op1stb 4209 to extract the first member and op2nda 4805 for an alternate version.) (Contributed by NM, 25-Nov-2003.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ ∩ ∩ ∩ ^{◡}{⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩} = 𝐵 | ||
Theorem | op2nda 4805 | Extract the second member of an ordered pair. (See op1sta 4802 to extract the first member and op2ndb 4804 for an alternate version.) (Contributed by NM, 17-Feb-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ ∪ ran {⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩} = 𝐵 | ||
Theorem | cnvsng 4806 | Converse of a singleton of an ordered pair. (Contributed by NM, 23-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → ^{◡}{⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩} = {⟨𝐵, 𝐴⟩}) | ||
Theorem | opswapg 4807 | Swap the members of an ordered pair. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 16-Dec-2018.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → ∪ ^{◡}{⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩} = ⟨𝐵, 𝐴⟩) | ||
Theorem | elxp4 4808 | Membership in a cross product. This version requires no quantifiers or dummy variables. See also elxp5 4809. (Contributed by NM, 17-Feb-2004.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 × 𝐶) ↔ (𝐴 = ⟨∪ dom {𝐴}, ∪ ran {𝐴}⟩ ∧ (∪ dom {𝐴} ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ∪ ran {𝐴} ∈ 𝐶))) | ||
Theorem | elxp5 4809 | Membership in a cross product requiring no quantifiers or dummy variables. Provides a slightly shorter version of elxp4 4808 when the double intersection does not create class existence problems (caused by int0 3629). (Contributed by NM, 1-Aug-2004.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 × 𝐶) ↔ (𝐴 = ⟨∩ ∩ 𝐴, ∪ ran {𝐴}⟩ ∧ (∩ ∩ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ∪ ran {𝐴} ∈ 𝐶))) | ||
Theorem | cnvresima 4810 | An image under the converse of a restriction. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 12-Jul-2009.) |
⊢ (^{◡}(𝐹 ↾ 𝐴) “ 𝐵) = ((^{◡}𝐹 “ 𝐵) ∩ 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | resdm2 4811 | A class restricted to its domain equals its double converse. (Contributed by NM, 8-Apr-2007.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ↾ dom 𝐴) = ^{◡}^{◡}𝐴 | ||
Theorem | resdmres 4812 | Restriction to the domain of a restriction. (Contributed by NM, 8-Apr-2007.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ↾ dom (𝐴 ↾ 𝐵)) = (𝐴 ↾ 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | imadmres 4813 | The image of the domain of a restriction. (Contributed by NM, 8-Apr-2007.) |
⊢ (𝐴 “ dom (𝐴 ↾ 𝐵)) = (𝐴 “ 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | mptpreima 4814* | The preimage of a function in maps-to notation. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 25-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (^{◡}𝐹 “ 𝐶) = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶} | ||
Theorem | mptiniseg 4815* | Converse singleton image of a function defined by maps-to. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 25-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 → (^{◡}𝐹 “ {𝐶}) = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝐵 = 𝐶}) | ||
Theorem | dmmpt 4816 | The domain of the mapping operation in general. (Contributed by NM, 16-May-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 22-Mar-2015.) |
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ dom 𝐹 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝐵 ∈ V} | ||
Theorem | dmmptss 4817* | The domain of a mapping is a subset of its base class. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 17-Jun-2013.) |
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ dom 𝐹 ⊆ 𝐴 | ||
Theorem | dmmptg 4818* | The domain of the mapping operation is the stated domain, if the function value is always a set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Feb-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 14-Sep-2013.) |
⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → dom (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) = 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | relco 4819 | A composition is a relation. Exercise 24 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 25. (Contributed by NM, 26-Jan-1997.) |
⊢ Rel (𝐴 ∘ 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | dfco2 4820* | Alternate definition of a class composition, using only one bound variable. (Contributed by NM, 19-Dec-2008.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∘ 𝐵) = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ V ((^{◡}𝐵 “ {𝑥}) × (𝐴 “ {𝑥})) | ||
Theorem | dfco2a 4821* | Generalization of dfco2 4820, where 𝐶 can have any value between dom 𝐴 ∩ ran 𝐵 and V. (Contributed by NM, 21-Dec-2008.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) |
⊢ ((dom 𝐴 ∩ ran 𝐵) ⊆ 𝐶 → (𝐴 ∘ 𝐵) = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ((^{◡}𝐵 “ {𝑥}) × (𝐴 “ {𝑥}))) | ||
Theorem | coundi 4822 | Class composition distributes over union. (Contributed by NM, 21-Dec-2008.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∘ (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶)) = ((𝐴 ∘ 𝐵) ∪ (𝐴 ∘ 𝐶)) | ||
Theorem | coundir 4823 | Class composition distributes over union. (Contributed by NM, 21-Dec-2008.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∘ 𝐶) = ((𝐴 ∘ 𝐶) ∪ (𝐵 ∘ 𝐶)) | ||
Theorem | cores 4824 | Restricted first member of a class composition. (Contributed by NM, 12-Oct-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) |
⊢ (ran 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶 → ((𝐴 ↾ 𝐶) ∘ 𝐵) = (𝐴 ∘ 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | resco 4825 | Associative law for the restriction of a composition. (Contributed by NM, 12-Dec-2006.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∘ 𝐵) ↾ 𝐶) = (𝐴 ∘ (𝐵 ↾ 𝐶)) | ||
Theorem | imaco 4826 | Image of the composition of two classes. (Contributed by Jason Orendorff, 12-Dec-2006.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∘ 𝐵) “ 𝐶) = (𝐴 “ (𝐵 “ 𝐶)) | ||
Theorem | rnco 4827 | The range of the composition of two classes. (Contributed by NM, 12-Dec-2006.) |
⊢ ran (𝐴 ∘ 𝐵) = ran (𝐴 ↾ ran 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | rnco2 4828 | The range of the composition of two classes. (Contributed by NM, 27-Mar-2008.) |
⊢ ran (𝐴 ∘ 𝐵) = (𝐴 “ ran 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | dmco 4829 | The domain of a composition. Exercise 27 of [Enderton] p. 53. (Contributed by NM, 4-Feb-2004.) |
⊢ dom (𝐴 ∘ 𝐵) = (^{◡}𝐵 “ dom 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | coiun 4830* | Composition with an indexed union. (Contributed by NM, 21-Dec-2008.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∘ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 𝐵) = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 (𝐴 ∘ 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | cocnvcnv1 4831 | A composition is not affected by a double converse of its first argument. (Contributed by NM, 8-Oct-2007.) |
⊢ (^{◡}^{◡}𝐴 ∘ 𝐵) = (𝐴 ∘ 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | cocnvcnv2 4832 | A composition is not affected by a double converse of its second argument. (Contributed by NM, 8-Oct-2007.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∘ ^{◡}^{◡}𝐵) = (𝐴 ∘ 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | cores2 4833 | Absorption of a reverse (preimage) restriction of the second member of a class composition. (Contributed by NM, 11-Dec-2006.) |
⊢ (dom 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶 → (𝐴 ∘ ^{◡}(^{◡}𝐵 ↾ 𝐶)) = (𝐴 ∘ 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | co02 4834 | Composition with the empty set. Theorem 20 of [Suppes] p. 63. (Contributed by NM, 24-Apr-2004.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∘ ∅) = ∅ | ||
Theorem | co01 4835 | Composition with the empty set. (Contributed by NM, 24-Apr-2004.) |
⊢ (∅ ∘ 𝐴) = ∅ | ||
Theorem | coi1 4836 | Composition with the identity relation. Part of Theorem 3.7(i) of [Monk1] p. 36. (Contributed by NM, 22-Apr-2004.) |
⊢ (Rel 𝐴 → (𝐴 ∘ I ) = 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | coi2 4837 | Composition with the identity relation. Part of Theorem 3.7(i) of [Monk1] p. 36. (Contributed by NM, 22-Apr-2004.) |
⊢ (Rel 𝐴 → ( I ∘ 𝐴) = 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | coires1 4838 | Composition with a restricted identity relation. (Contributed by FL, 19-Jun-2011.) (Revised by Stefan O'Rear, 7-Mar-2015.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∘ ( I ↾ 𝐵)) = (𝐴 ↾ 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | coass 4839 | Associative law for class composition. Theorem 27 of [Suppes] p. 64. Also Exercise 21 of [Enderton] p. 53. Interestingly, this law holds for any classes whatsoever, not just functions or even relations. (Contributed by NM, 27-Jan-1997.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∘ 𝐵) ∘ 𝐶) = (𝐴 ∘ (𝐵 ∘ 𝐶)) | ||
Theorem | relcnvtr 4840 | A relation is transitive iff its converse is transitive. (Contributed by FL, 19-Sep-2011.) |
⊢ (Rel 𝑅 → ((𝑅 ∘ 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑅 ↔ (^{◡}𝑅 ∘ ^{◡}𝑅) ⊆ ^{◡}𝑅)) | ||
Theorem | relssdmrn 4841 | A relation is included in the cross product of its domain and range. Exercise 4.12(t) of [Mendelson] p. 235. (Contributed by NM, 3-Aug-1994.) |
⊢ (Rel 𝐴 → 𝐴 ⊆ (dom 𝐴 × ran 𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | cnvssrndm 4842 | The converse is a subset of the cartesian product of range and domain. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ ^{◡}𝐴 ⊆ (ran 𝐴 × dom 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | cossxp 4843 | Composition as a subset of the cross product of factors. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∘ 𝐵) ⊆ (dom 𝐵 × ran 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | relrelss 4844 | Two ways to describe the structure of a two-place operation. (Contributed by NM, 17-Dec-2008.) |
⊢ ((Rel 𝐴 ∧ Rel dom 𝐴) ↔ 𝐴 ⊆ ((V × V) × V)) | ||
Theorem | unielrel 4845 | The membership relation for a relation is inherited by class union. (Contributed by NM, 17-Sep-2006.) |
⊢ ((Rel 𝑅 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑅) → ∪ 𝐴 ∈ ∪ 𝑅) | ||
Theorem | relfld 4846 | The double union of a relation is its field. (Contributed by NM, 17-Sep-2006.) |
⊢ (Rel 𝑅 → ∪ ∪ 𝑅 = (dom 𝑅 ∪ ran 𝑅)) | ||
Theorem | relresfld 4847 | Restriction of a relation to its field. (Contributed by FL, 15-Apr-2012.) |
⊢ (Rel 𝑅 → (𝑅 ↾ ∪ ∪ 𝑅) = 𝑅) | ||
Theorem | relcoi2 4848 | Composition with the identity relation restricted to a relation's field. (Contributed by FL, 2-May-2011.) |
⊢ (Rel 𝑅 → (( I ↾ ∪ ∪ 𝑅) ∘ 𝑅) = 𝑅) | ||
Theorem | relcoi1 4849 | Composition with the identity relation restricted to a relation's field. (Contributed by FL, 8-May-2011.) |
⊢ (Rel 𝑅 → (𝑅 ∘ ( I ↾ ∪ ∪ 𝑅)) = 𝑅) | ||
Theorem | unidmrn 4850 | The double union of the converse of a class is its field. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jun-2008.) |
⊢ ∪ ∪ ^{◡}𝐴 = (dom 𝐴 ∪ ran 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | relcnvfld 4851 | if 𝑅 is a relation, its double union equals the double union of its converse. (Contributed by FL, 5-Jan-2009.) |
⊢ (Rel 𝑅 → ∪ ∪ 𝑅 = ∪ ∪ ^{◡}𝑅) | ||
Theorem | dfdm2 4852 | Alternate definition of domain df-dm 4355 that doesn't require dummy variables. (Contributed by NM, 2-Aug-2010.) |
⊢ dom 𝐴 = ∪ ∪ (^{◡}𝐴 ∘ 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | unixpm 4853* | The double class union of an inhabited cross product is the union of its members. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 18-Dec-2018.) |
⊢ (∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵) → ∪ ∪ (𝐴 × 𝐵) = (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | unixp0im 4854 | The union of an empty cross product is empty. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 18-Dec-2018.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 × 𝐵) = ∅ → ∪ (𝐴 × 𝐵) = ∅) | ||
Theorem | cnvexg 4855 | The converse of a set is a set. Corollary 6.8(1) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 26. (Contributed by NM, 17-Mar-1998.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ^{◡}𝐴 ∈ V) | ||
Theorem | cnvex 4856 | The converse of a set is a set. Corollary 6.8(1) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 26. (Contributed by NM, 19-Dec-2003.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ ^{◡}𝐴 ∈ V | ||
Theorem | relcnvexb 4857 | A relation is a set iff its converse is a set. (Contributed by FL, 3-Mar-2007.) |
⊢ (Rel 𝑅 → (𝑅 ∈ V ↔ ^{◡}𝑅 ∈ V)) | ||
Theorem | ressn 4858 | Restriction of a class to a singleton. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Dec-2014.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ↾ {𝐵}) = ({𝐵} × (𝐴 “ {𝐵})) | ||
Theorem | cnviinm 4859* | The converse of an intersection is the intersection of the converse. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 18-Dec-2018.) |
⊢ (∃𝑦 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 → ^{◡}∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 = ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ^{◡}𝐵) | ||
Theorem | cnvpom 4860* | The converse of a partial order relation is a partial order relation. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jun-2005.) |
⊢ (∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝑅 Po 𝐴 ↔ ^{◡}𝑅 Po 𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | cnvsom 4861* | The converse of a strict order relation is a strict order relation. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 19-Dec-2018.) |
⊢ (∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝑅 Or 𝐴 ↔ ^{◡}𝑅 Or 𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | coexg 4862 | The composition of two sets is a set. (Contributed by NM, 19-Mar-1998.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴 ∘ 𝐵) ∈ V) | ||
Theorem | coex 4863 | The composition of two sets is a set. (Contributed by NM, 15-Dec-2003.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∘ 𝐵) ∈ V | ||
Theorem | xpcom 4864* | Composition of two cross products. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 20-Dec-2018.) |
⊢ (∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 → ((𝐵 × 𝐶) ∘ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) = (𝐴 × 𝐶)) | ||
Syntax | cio 4865 | Extend class notation with Russell's definition description binder (inverted iota). |
class (℩𝑥𝜑) | ||
Theorem | iotajust 4866* | Soundness justification theorem for df-iota 4867. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 29-Jun-2011.) |
⊢ ∪ {𝑦 ∣ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑦}} = ∪ {𝑧 ∣ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑧}} | ||
Definition | df-iota 4867* |
Define Russell's definition description binder, which can be read as
"the unique 𝑥 such that 𝜑," where 𝜑
ordinarily contains
𝑥 as a free variable. Our definition
is meaningful only when there
is exactly one 𝑥 such that 𝜑 is true (see iotaval 4878);
otherwise, it evaluates to the empty set (see iotanul 4882). Russell used
the inverted iota symbol ℩ to represent
the binder.
Sometimes proofs need to expand an iota-based definition. That is, given "X = the x for which ... x ... x ..." holds, the proof needs to get to "... X ... X ...". A general strategy to do this is to use iotacl 4890 (for unbounded iota). This can be easier than applying a version that applies an explicit substitution, because substituting an iota into its own property always has a bound variable clash which must be first renamed or else guarded with NF. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 30-Jun-2011.) |
⊢ (℩𝑥𝜑) = ∪ {𝑦 ∣ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑦}} | ||
Theorem | dfiota2 4868* | Alternate definition for descriptions. Definition 8.18 in [Quine] p. 56. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 30-Jun-2011.) |
⊢ (℩𝑥𝜑) = ∪ {𝑦 ∣ ∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑦)} | ||
Theorem | nfiota1 4869 | Bound-variable hypothesis builder for the ℩ class. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 11-Jul-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Oct-2016.) |
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(℩𝑥𝜑) | ||
Theorem | nfiotadxy 4870* | Deduction version of nfiotaxy 4871. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 21-Dec-2018.) |
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑 & ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥(℩𝑦𝜓)) | ||
Theorem | nfiotaxy 4871* | Bound-variable hypothesis builder for the ℩ class. (Contributed by NM, 23-Aug-2011.) |
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑 ⇒ ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(℩𝑦𝜑) | ||
Theorem | cbviota 4872 | Change bound variables in a description binder. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 1-Aug-2011.) |
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓 ⇒ ⊢ (℩𝑥𝜑) = (℩𝑦𝜓) | ||
Theorem | cbviotav 4873* | Change bound variables in a description binder. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 1-Aug-2011.) |
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ⇒ ⊢ (℩𝑥𝜑) = (℩𝑦𝜓) | ||
Theorem | sb8iota 4874 | Variable substitution in description binder. Compare sb8eu 1913. (Contributed by NM, 18-Mar-2013.) |
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑 ⇒ ⊢ (℩𝑥𝜑) = (℩𝑦[𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑) | ||
Theorem | iotaeq 4875 | Equality theorem for descriptions. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 30-Jun-2011.) |
⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (℩𝑥𝜑) = (℩𝑦𝜑)) | ||
Theorem | iotabi 4876 | Equivalence theorem for descriptions. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 30-Jun-2011.) |
⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → (℩𝑥𝜑) = (℩𝑥𝜓)) | ||
Theorem | uniabio 4877* | Part of Theorem 8.17 in [Quine] p. 56. This theorem serves as a lemma for the fundamental property of iota. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 11-Jul-2011.) |
⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → ∪ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = 𝑦) | ||
Theorem | iotaval 4878* | Theorem 8.19 in [Quine] p. 57. This theorem is the fundamental property of iota. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 11-Jul-2011.) |
⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → (℩𝑥𝜑) = 𝑦) | ||
Theorem | iotauni 4879 | Equivalence between two different forms of ℩. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 12-Jul-2011.) |
⊢ (∃!𝑥𝜑 → (℩𝑥𝜑) = ∪ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑}) | ||
Theorem | iotaint 4880 | Equivalence between two different forms of ℩. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Dec-2016.) |
⊢ (∃!𝑥𝜑 → (℩𝑥𝜑) = ∩ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑}) | ||
Theorem | iota1 4881 | Property of iota. (Contributed by NM, 23-Aug-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Dec-2016.) |
⊢ (∃!𝑥𝜑 → (𝜑 ↔ (℩𝑥𝜑) = 𝑥)) | ||
Theorem | iotanul 4882 | Theorem 8.22 in [Quine] p. 57. This theorem is the result if there isn't exactly one 𝑥 that satisfies 𝜑. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 11-Jul-2011.) |
⊢ (¬ ∃!𝑥𝜑 → (℩𝑥𝜑) = ∅) | ||
Theorem | euiotaex 4883 | Theorem 8.23 in [Quine] p. 58, with existential uniqueness condition added. This theorem proves the existence of the ℩ class under our definition. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 21-Dec-2018.) |
⊢ (∃!𝑥𝜑 → (℩𝑥𝜑) ∈ V) | ||
Theorem | iotass 4884* | Value of iota based on a proposition which holds only for values which are subsets of a given class. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro and Jim Kingdon, 21-Dec-2018.) |
⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴) → (℩𝑥𝜑) ⊆ 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | iota4 4885 | Theorem *14.22 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 190. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 12-Jul-2011.) |
⊢ (∃!𝑥𝜑 → [(℩𝑥𝜑) / 𝑥]𝜑) | ||
Theorem | iota4an 4886 | Theorem *14.23 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 191. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 12-Jul-2011.) |
⊢ (∃!𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → [(℩𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)) / 𝑥]𝜑) | ||
Theorem | iota5 4887* | A method for computing iota. (Contributed by NM, 17-Sep-2013.) |
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝐴)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) → (℩𝑥𝜓) = 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | iotabidv 4888* | Formula-building deduction rule for iota. (Contributed by NM, 20-Aug-2011.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (℩𝑥𝜓) = (℩𝑥𝜒)) | ||
Theorem | iotabii 4889 | Formula-building deduction rule for iota. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Oct-2015.) |
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ (℩𝑥𝜑) = (℩𝑥𝜓) | ||
Theorem | iotacl 4890 |
Membership law for descriptions.
This can useful for expanding an unbounded iota-based definition (see df-iota 4867). (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 1-Aug-2011.) |
⊢ (∃!𝑥𝜑 → (℩𝑥𝜑) ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑}) | ||
Theorem | iota2df 4891 | A condition that allows us to represent "the unique element such that 𝜑 " with a class expression 𝐴. (Contributed by NM, 30-Dec-2014.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃!𝑥𝜓) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐵) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑 & ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜒) & ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 ↔ (℩𝑥𝜓) = 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | iota2d 4892* | A condition that allows us to represent "the unique element such that 𝜑 " with a class expression 𝐴. (Contributed by NM, 30-Dec-2014.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃!𝑥𝜓) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐵) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 ↔ (℩𝑥𝜓) = 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | iota2 4893* | The unique element such that 𝜑. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 1-Jun-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Dec-2016.) |
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ∃!𝑥𝜑) → (𝜓 ↔ (℩𝑥𝜑) = 𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | sniota 4894 | A class abstraction with a unique member can be expressed as a singleton. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Dec-2016.) |
⊢ (∃!𝑥𝜑 → {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = {(℩𝑥𝜑)}) | ||
Theorem | csbiotag 4895* | Class substitution within a description binder. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 6-Oct-2017.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(℩𝑦𝜑) = (℩𝑦[𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑)) | ||
Syntax | wfun 4896 | Extend the definition of a wff to include the function predicate. (Read: 𝐴 is a function.) |
wff Fun 𝐴 | ||
Syntax | wfn 4897 | Extend the definition of a wff to include the function predicate with a domain. (Read: 𝐴 is a function on 𝐵.) |
wff 𝐴 Fn 𝐵 | ||
Syntax | wf 4898 | Extend the definition of a wff to include the function predicate with domain and codomain. (Read: 𝐹 maps 𝐴 into 𝐵.) |
wff 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 | ||
Syntax | wf1 4899 | Extend the definition of a wff to include one-to-one functions. (Read: 𝐹 maps 𝐴 one-to-one into 𝐵.) The notation ("1-1" above the arrow) is from Definition 6.15(5) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 27. |
wff 𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵 | ||
Syntax | wfo 4900 | Extend the definition of a wff to include onto functions. (Read: 𝐹 maps 𝐴 onto 𝐵.) The notation ("onto" below the arrow) is from Definition 6.15(4) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 27. |
wff 𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝐵 |
< Previous Next > |
Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |