Home | Metamath
Proof Explorer Theorem List (p. 68 of 424) | < Previous Next > |
Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
Color key: | Metamath Proof Explorer
(1-27159) |
Hilbert Space Explorer
(27160-28684) |
Users' Mathboxes
(28685-42360) |
Type | Label | Description |
---|---|---|
Statement | ||
Theorem | oprssov 6701 | The value of a member of the domain of a subclass of an operation. (Contributed by NM, 23-Aug-2007.) |
⊢ (((Fun 𝐹 ∧ 𝐺 Fn (𝐶 × 𝐷) ∧ 𝐺 ⊆ 𝐹) ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷)) → (𝐴𝐹𝐵) = (𝐴𝐺𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | fovrn 6702 | An operation's value belongs to its codomain. (Contributed by NM, 27-Aug-2006.) |
⊢ ((𝐹:(𝑅 × 𝑆)⟶𝐶 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆) → (𝐴𝐹𝐵) ∈ 𝐶) | ||
Theorem | fovrnda 6703 | An operation's value belongs to its codomain. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-Dec-2016.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:(𝑅 × 𝑆)⟶𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝐴𝐹𝐵) ∈ 𝐶) | ||
Theorem | fovrnd 6704 | An operation's value belongs to its codomain. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-Dec-2016.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:(𝑅 × 𝑆)⟶𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑅) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴𝐹𝐵) ∈ 𝐶) | ||
Theorem | fnrnov 6705* | The range of an operation expressed as a collection of the operation's values. (Contributed by NM, 29-Oct-2006.) |
⊢ (𝐹 Fn (𝐴 × 𝐵) → ran 𝐹 = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑧 = (𝑥𝐹𝑦)}) | ||
Theorem | foov 6706* | An onto mapping of an operation expressed in terms of operation values. (Contributed by NM, 29-Oct-2006.) |
⊢ (𝐹:(𝐴 × 𝐵)–onto→𝐶 ↔ (𝐹:(𝐴 × 𝐵)⟶𝐶 ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑧 = (𝑥𝐹𝑦))) | ||
Theorem | fnovrn 6707 | An operation's value belongs to its range. (Contributed by NM, 10-Feb-2007.) |
⊢ ((𝐹 Fn (𝐴 × 𝐵) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝐶𝐹𝐷) ∈ ran 𝐹) | ||
Theorem | ovelrn 6708* | A member of an operation's range is a value of the operation. (Contributed by NM, 7-Feb-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 30-Jan-2014.) |
⊢ (𝐹 Fn (𝐴 × 𝐵) → (𝐶 ∈ ran 𝐹 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶 = (𝑥𝐹𝑦))) | ||
Theorem | funimassov 6709* | Membership relation for the values of a function whose image is a subclass. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Dec-2013.) |
⊢ ((Fun 𝐹 ∧ (𝐴 × 𝐵) ⊆ dom 𝐹) → ((𝐹 “ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) ⊆ 𝐶 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥𝐹𝑦) ∈ 𝐶)) | ||
Theorem | ovelimab 6710* | Operation value in an image. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Dec-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 29-Jan-2014.) |
⊢ ((𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ (𝐵 × 𝐶) ⊆ 𝐴) → (𝐷 ∈ (𝐹 “ (𝐵 × 𝐶)) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 𝐷 = (𝑥𝐹𝑦))) | ||
Theorem | ovima0 6711 | An operation value is a member of the image plus null. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 25-Jun-2019.) |
⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋𝑅𝑌) ∈ ((𝑅 “ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) ∪ {∅})) | ||
Theorem | ovconst2 6712 | The value of a constant operation. (Contributed by NM, 5-Nov-2006.) |
⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑆 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑅((𝐴 × 𝐵) × {𝐶})𝑆) = 𝐶) | ||
Theorem | oprssdm 6713* | Domain of closure of an operation. (Contributed by NM, 24-Aug-1995.) |
⊢ ¬ ∅ ∈ 𝑆 & ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) → (𝑥𝐹𝑦) ∈ 𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑆 × 𝑆) ⊆ dom 𝐹 | ||
Theorem | nssdmovg 6714 | The value of an operation outside its domain. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 7-Sep-2017.) |
⊢ ((dom 𝐹 ⊆ (𝑅 × 𝑆) ∧ ¬ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝐴𝐹𝐵) = ∅) | ||
Theorem | ndmovg 6715 | The value of an operation outside its domain. (Contributed by NM, 28-Mar-2008.) |
⊢ ((dom 𝐹 = (𝑅 × 𝑆) ∧ ¬ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝐴𝐹𝐵) = ∅) | ||
Theorem | ndmov 6716 | The value of an operation outside its domain. (Contributed by NM, 24-Aug-1995.) |
⊢ dom 𝐹 = (𝑆 × 𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ (¬ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆) → (𝐴𝐹𝐵) = ∅) | ||
Theorem | ndmovcl 6717 | The closure of an operation outside its domain, when the domain includes the empty set. This technical lemma can make the operation more convenient to work in some cases. It is dependent on our particular definitions of operation value, function value, and ordered pair. (Contributed by NM, 24-Sep-2004.) |
⊢ dom 𝐹 = (𝑆 × 𝑆) & ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆) → (𝐴𝐹𝐵) ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ ∅ ∈ 𝑆 ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴𝐹𝐵) ∈ 𝑆 | ||
Theorem | ndmovrcl 6718 | Reverse closure law, when an operation's domain doesn't contain the empty set. (Contributed by NM, 3-Feb-1996.) |
⊢ dom 𝐹 = (𝑆 × 𝑆) & ⊢ ¬ ∅ ∈ 𝑆 ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴𝐹𝐵) ∈ 𝑆 → (𝐴 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆)) | ||
Theorem | ndmovcom 6719 | Any operation is commutative outside its domain. (Contributed by NM, 24-Aug-1995.) |
⊢ dom 𝐹 = (𝑆 × 𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ (¬ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆) → (𝐴𝐹𝐵) = (𝐵𝐹𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | ndmovass 6720 | Any operation is associative outside its domain, if the domain doesn't contain the empty set. (Contributed by NM, 24-Aug-1995.) |
⊢ dom 𝐹 = (𝑆 × 𝑆) & ⊢ ¬ ∅ ∈ 𝑆 ⇒ ⊢ (¬ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑆) → ((𝐴𝐹𝐵)𝐹𝐶) = (𝐴𝐹(𝐵𝐹𝐶))) | ||
Theorem | ndmovdistr 6721 | Any operation is distributive outside its domain, if the domain doesn't contain the empty set. (Contributed by NM, 24-Aug-1995.) |
⊢ dom 𝐹 = (𝑆 × 𝑆) & ⊢ ¬ ∅ ∈ 𝑆 & ⊢ dom 𝐺 = (𝑆 × 𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ (¬ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑆) → (𝐴𝐺(𝐵𝐹𝐶)) = ((𝐴𝐺𝐵)𝐹(𝐴𝐺𝐶))) | ||
Theorem | ndmovord 6722 | Elimination of redundant antecedents in an ordering law. (Contributed by NM, 7-Mar-1996.) |
⊢ dom 𝐹 = (𝑆 × 𝑆) & ⊢ 𝑅 ⊆ (𝑆 × 𝑆) & ⊢ ¬ ∅ ∈ 𝑆 & ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑆) → (𝐴𝑅𝐵 ↔ (𝐶𝐹𝐴)𝑅(𝐶𝐹𝐵))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑆 → (𝐴𝑅𝐵 ↔ (𝐶𝐹𝐴)𝑅(𝐶𝐹𝐵))) | ||
Theorem | ndmovordi 6723 | Elimination of redundant antecedent in an ordering law. (Contributed by NM, 25-Jun-1998.) |
⊢ dom 𝐹 = (𝑆 × 𝑆) & ⊢ 𝑅 ⊆ (𝑆 × 𝑆) & ⊢ ¬ ∅ ∈ 𝑆 & ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑆 → (𝐴𝑅𝐵 ↔ (𝐶𝐹𝐴)𝑅(𝐶𝐹𝐵))) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐶𝐹𝐴)𝑅(𝐶𝐹𝐵) → 𝐴𝑅𝐵) | ||
Theorem | caovclg 6724* | Convert an operation closure law to class notation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-May-2014.) |
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷)) → (𝑥𝐹𝑦) ∈ 𝐸) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷)) → (𝐴𝐹𝐵) ∈ 𝐸) | ||
Theorem | caovcld 6725* | Convert an operation closure law to class notation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-Dec-2014.) |
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷)) → (𝑥𝐹𝑦) ∈ 𝐸) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴𝐹𝐵) ∈ 𝐸) | ||
Theorem | caovcl 6726* | Convert an operation closure law to class notation. (Contributed by NM, 4-Aug-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-May-2014.) |
⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) → (𝑥𝐹𝑦) ∈ 𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆) → (𝐴𝐹𝐵) ∈ 𝑆) | ||
Theorem | caovcomg 6727* | Convert an operation commutative law to class notation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 1-Jun-2013.) |
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝑥𝐹𝑦) = (𝑦𝐹𝑥)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝐴𝐹𝐵) = (𝐵𝐹𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | caovcomd 6728* | Convert an operation commutative law to class notation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-Dec-2014.) |
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝑥𝐹𝑦) = (𝑦𝐹𝑥)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴𝐹𝐵) = (𝐵𝐹𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | caovcom 6729* | Convert an operation commutative law to class notation. (Contributed by NM, 26-Aug-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 1-Jun-2013.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V & ⊢ (𝑥𝐹𝑦) = (𝑦𝐹𝑥) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴𝐹𝐵) = (𝐵𝐹𝐴) | ||
Theorem | caovassg 6730* | Convert an operation associative law to class notation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 1-Jun-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-May-2014.) |
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑆)) → ((𝑥𝐹𝑦)𝐹𝑧) = (𝑥𝐹(𝑦𝐹𝑧))) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑆)) → ((𝐴𝐹𝐵)𝐹𝐶) = (𝐴𝐹(𝐵𝐹𝐶))) | ||
Theorem | caovassd 6731* | Convert an operation associative law to class notation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-Dec-2014.) |
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑆)) → ((𝑥𝐹𝑦)𝐹𝑧) = (𝑥𝐹(𝑦𝐹𝑧))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴𝐹𝐵)𝐹𝐶) = (𝐴𝐹(𝐵𝐹𝐶))) | ||
Theorem | caovass 6732* | Convert an operation associative law to class notation. (Contributed by NM, 26-Aug-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-May-2014.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V & ⊢ ((𝑥𝐹𝑦)𝐹𝑧) = (𝑥𝐹(𝑦𝐹𝑧)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴𝐹𝐵)𝐹𝐶) = (𝐴𝐹(𝐵𝐹𝐶)) | ||
Theorem | caovcang 6733* | Convert an operation cancellation law to class notation. (Contributed by NM, 20-Aug-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 30-Dec-2014.) |
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑆)) → ((𝑥𝐹𝑦) = (𝑥𝐹𝑧) ↔ 𝑦 = 𝑧)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑆)) → ((𝐴𝐹𝐵) = (𝐴𝐹𝐶) ↔ 𝐵 = 𝐶)) | ||
Theorem | caovcand 6734* | Convert an operation cancellation law to class notation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-Dec-2014.) |
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑆)) → ((𝑥𝐹𝑦) = (𝑥𝐹𝑧) ↔ 𝑦 = 𝑧)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑇) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴𝐹𝐵) = (𝐴𝐹𝐶) ↔ 𝐵 = 𝐶)) | ||
Theorem | caovcanrd 6735* | Commute the arguments of an operation cancellation law. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-Dec-2014.) |
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑇 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑆)) → ((𝑥𝐹𝑦) = (𝑥𝐹𝑧) ↔ 𝑦 = 𝑧)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑇) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝑥𝐹𝑦) = (𝑦𝐹𝑥)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐵𝐹𝐴) = (𝐶𝐹𝐴) ↔ 𝐵 = 𝐶)) | ||
Theorem | caovcan 6736* | Convert an operation cancellation law to class notation. (Contributed by NM, 20-Aug-1995.) |
⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V & ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) → ((𝑥𝐹𝑦) = (𝑥𝐹𝑧) → 𝑦 = 𝑧)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆) → ((𝐴𝐹𝐵) = (𝐴𝐹𝐶) → 𝐵 = 𝐶)) | ||
Theorem | caovordig 6737* | Convert an operation ordering law to class notation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 31-Dec-2014.) |
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝑥𝑅𝑦 → (𝑧𝐹𝑥)𝑅(𝑧𝐹𝑦))) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝐴𝑅𝐵 → (𝐶𝐹𝐴)𝑅(𝐶𝐹𝐵))) | ||
Theorem | caovordid 6738* | Convert an operation ordering law to class notation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 31-Dec-2014.) |
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝑥𝑅𝑦 → (𝑧𝐹𝑥)𝑅(𝑧𝐹𝑦))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴𝑅𝐵 → (𝐶𝐹𝐴)𝑅(𝐶𝐹𝐵))) | ||
Theorem | caovordg 6739* | Convert an operation ordering law to class notation. (Contributed by NM, 19-Feb-1996.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 30-Dec-2014.) |
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝑥𝑅𝑦 ↔ (𝑧𝐹𝑥)𝑅(𝑧𝐹𝑦))) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝐴𝑅𝐵 ↔ (𝐶𝐹𝐴)𝑅(𝐶𝐹𝐵))) | ||
Theorem | caovordd 6740* | Convert an operation ordering law to class notation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-Dec-2014.) |
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝑥𝑅𝑦 ↔ (𝑧𝐹𝑥)𝑅(𝑧𝐹𝑦))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴𝑅𝐵 ↔ (𝐶𝐹𝐴)𝑅(𝐶𝐹𝐵))) | ||
Theorem | caovord2d 6741* | Operation ordering law with commuted arguments. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-Dec-2014.) |
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝑥𝑅𝑦 ↔ (𝑧𝐹𝑥)𝑅(𝑧𝐹𝑦))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝑥𝐹𝑦) = (𝑦𝐹𝑥)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴𝑅𝐵 ↔ (𝐴𝐹𝐶)𝑅(𝐵𝐹𝐶))) | ||
Theorem | caovord3d 6742* | Ordering law. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-Dec-2014.) |
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝑥𝑅𝑦 ↔ (𝑧𝐹𝑥)𝑅(𝑧𝐹𝑦))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝑥𝐹𝑦) = (𝑦𝐹𝑥)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴𝐹𝐵) = (𝐶𝐹𝐷) → (𝐴𝑅𝐶 ↔ 𝐷𝑅𝐵))) | ||
Theorem | caovord 6743* | Convert an operation ordering law to class notation. (Contributed by NM, 19-Feb-1996.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V & ⊢ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑆 → (𝑥𝑅𝑦 ↔ (𝑧𝐹𝑥)𝑅(𝑧𝐹𝑦))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑆 → (𝐴𝑅𝐵 ↔ (𝐶𝐹𝐴)𝑅(𝐶𝐹𝐵))) | ||
Theorem | caovord2 6744* | Operation ordering law with commuted arguments. (Contributed by NM, 27-Feb-1996.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V & ⊢ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑆 → (𝑥𝑅𝑦 ↔ (𝑧𝐹𝑥)𝑅(𝑧𝐹𝑦))) & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V & ⊢ (𝑥𝐹𝑦) = (𝑦𝐹𝑥) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑆 → (𝐴𝑅𝐵 ↔ (𝐴𝐹𝐶)𝑅(𝐵𝐹𝐶))) | ||
Theorem | caovord3 6745* | Ordering law. (Contributed by NM, 29-Feb-1996.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V & ⊢ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑆 → (𝑥𝑅𝑦 ↔ (𝑧𝐹𝑥)𝑅(𝑧𝐹𝑦))) & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V & ⊢ (𝑥𝐹𝑦) = (𝑦𝐹𝑥) & ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐵 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝐴𝐹𝐵) = (𝐶𝐹𝐷)) → (𝐴𝑅𝐶 ↔ 𝐷𝑅𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | caovdig 6746* | Convert an operation distributive law to class notation. (Contributed by NM, 25-Aug-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Jul-2014.) |
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝑥𝐺(𝑦𝐹𝑧)) = ((𝑥𝐺𝑦)𝐻(𝑥𝐺𝑧))) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝐴𝐺(𝐵𝐹𝐶)) = ((𝐴𝐺𝐵)𝐻(𝐴𝐺𝐶))) | ||
Theorem | caovdid 6747* | Convert an operation distributive law to class notation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-Dec-2014.) |
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝑥𝐺(𝑦𝐹𝑧)) = ((𝑥𝐺𝑦)𝐻(𝑥𝐺𝑧))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐾) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴𝐺(𝐵𝐹𝐶)) = ((𝐴𝐺𝐵)𝐻(𝐴𝐺𝐶))) | ||
Theorem | caovdir2d 6748* | Convert an operation distributive law to class notation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-Dec-2014.) |
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝑥𝐺(𝑦𝐹𝑧)) = ((𝑥𝐺𝑦)𝐹(𝑥𝐺𝑧))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝑥𝐹𝑦) ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝑥𝐺𝑦) = (𝑦𝐺𝑥)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴𝐹𝐵)𝐺𝐶) = ((𝐴𝐺𝐶)𝐹(𝐵𝐺𝐶))) | ||
Theorem | caovdirg 6749* | Convert an operation reverse distributive law to class notation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Oct-2014.) |
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐾)) → ((𝑥𝐹𝑦)𝐺𝑧) = ((𝑥𝐺𝑧)𝐻(𝑦𝐺𝑧))) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐾)) → ((𝐴𝐹𝐵)𝐺𝐶) = ((𝐴𝐺𝐶)𝐻(𝐵𝐺𝐶))) | ||
Theorem | caovdird 6750* | Convert an operation distributive law to class notation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-Dec-2014.) |
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐾)) → ((𝑥𝐹𝑦)𝐺𝑧) = ((𝑥𝐺𝑧)𝐻(𝑦𝐺𝑧))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴𝐹𝐵)𝐺𝐶) = ((𝐴𝐺𝐶)𝐻(𝐵𝐺𝐶))) | ||
Theorem | caovdi 6751* | Convert an operation distributive law to class notation. (Contributed by NM, 25-Aug-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 28-Jun-2013.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V & ⊢ (𝑥𝐺(𝑦𝐹𝑧)) = ((𝑥𝐺𝑦)𝐹(𝑥𝐺𝑧)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴𝐺(𝐵𝐹𝐶)) = ((𝐴𝐺𝐵)𝐹(𝐴𝐺𝐶)) | ||
Theorem | caov32d 6752* | Rearrange arguments in a commutative, associative operation. (Contributed by NM, 26-Aug-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 30-Dec-2014.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝑥𝐹𝑦) = (𝑦𝐹𝑥)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑆)) → ((𝑥𝐹𝑦)𝐹𝑧) = (𝑥𝐹(𝑦𝐹𝑧))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴𝐹𝐵)𝐹𝐶) = ((𝐴𝐹𝐶)𝐹𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | caov12d 6753* | Rearrange arguments in a commutative, associative operation. (Contributed by NM, 26-Aug-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 30-Dec-2014.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝑥𝐹𝑦) = (𝑦𝐹𝑥)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑆)) → ((𝑥𝐹𝑦)𝐹𝑧) = (𝑥𝐹(𝑦𝐹𝑧))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴𝐹(𝐵𝐹𝐶)) = (𝐵𝐹(𝐴𝐹𝐶))) | ||
Theorem | caov31d 6754* | Rearrange arguments in a commutative, associative operation. (Contributed by NM, 26-Aug-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 30-Dec-2014.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝑥𝐹𝑦) = (𝑦𝐹𝑥)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑆)) → ((𝑥𝐹𝑦)𝐹𝑧) = (𝑥𝐹(𝑦𝐹𝑧))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴𝐹𝐵)𝐹𝐶) = ((𝐶𝐹𝐵)𝐹𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | caov13d 6755* | Rearrange arguments in a commutative, associative operation. (Contributed by NM, 26-Aug-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 30-Dec-2014.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝑥𝐹𝑦) = (𝑦𝐹𝑥)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑆)) → ((𝑥𝐹𝑦)𝐹𝑧) = (𝑥𝐹(𝑦𝐹𝑧))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴𝐹(𝐵𝐹𝐶)) = (𝐶𝐹(𝐵𝐹𝐴))) | ||
Theorem | caov4d 6756* | Rearrange arguments in a commutative, associative operation. (Contributed by NM, 26-Aug-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 30-Dec-2014.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝑥𝐹𝑦) = (𝑦𝐹𝑥)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑆)) → ((𝑥𝐹𝑦)𝐹𝑧) = (𝑥𝐹(𝑦𝐹𝑧))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝑥𝐹𝑦) ∈ 𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴𝐹𝐵)𝐹(𝐶𝐹𝐷)) = ((𝐴𝐹𝐶)𝐹(𝐵𝐹𝐷))) | ||
Theorem | caov411d 6757* | Rearrange arguments in a commutative, associative operation. (Contributed by NM, 26-Aug-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 30-Dec-2014.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝑥𝐹𝑦) = (𝑦𝐹𝑥)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑆)) → ((𝑥𝐹𝑦)𝐹𝑧) = (𝑥𝐹(𝑦𝐹𝑧))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝑥𝐹𝑦) ∈ 𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴𝐹𝐵)𝐹(𝐶𝐹𝐷)) = ((𝐶𝐹𝐵)𝐹(𝐴𝐹𝐷))) | ||
Theorem | caov42d 6758* | Rearrange arguments in a commutative, associative operation. (Contributed by NM, 26-Aug-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 30-Dec-2014.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝑥𝐹𝑦) = (𝑦𝐹𝑥)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑆)) → ((𝑥𝐹𝑦)𝐹𝑧) = (𝑥𝐹(𝑦𝐹𝑧))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝑥𝐹𝑦) ∈ 𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴𝐹𝐵)𝐹(𝐶𝐹𝐷)) = ((𝐴𝐹𝐶)𝐹(𝐷𝐹𝐵))) | ||
Theorem | caov32 6759* | Rearrange arguments in a commutative, associative operation. (Contributed by NM, 26-Aug-1995.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V & ⊢ (𝑥𝐹𝑦) = (𝑦𝐹𝑥) & ⊢ ((𝑥𝐹𝑦)𝐹𝑧) = (𝑥𝐹(𝑦𝐹𝑧)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴𝐹𝐵)𝐹𝐶) = ((𝐴𝐹𝐶)𝐹𝐵) | ||
Theorem | caov12 6760* | Rearrange arguments in a commutative, associative operation. (Contributed by NM, 26-Aug-1995.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V & ⊢ (𝑥𝐹𝑦) = (𝑦𝐹𝑥) & ⊢ ((𝑥𝐹𝑦)𝐹𝑧) = (𝑥𝐹(𝑦𝐹𝑧)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴𝐹(𝐵𝐹𝐶)) = (𝐵𝐹(𝐴𝐹𝐶)) | ||
Theorem | caov31 6761* | Rearrange arguments in a commutative, associative operation. (Contributed by NM, 26-Aug-1995.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V & ⊢ (𝑥𝐹𝑦) = (𝑦𝐹𝑥) & ⊢ ((𝑥𝐹𝑦)𝐹𝑧) = (𝑥𝐹(𝑦𝐹𝑧)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴𝐹𝐵)𝐹𝐶) = ((𝐶𝐹𝐵)𝐹𝐴) | ||
Theorem | caov13 6762* | Rearrange arguments in a commutative, associative operation. (Contributed by NM, 26-Aug-1995.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V & ⊢ (𝑥𝐹𝑦) = (𝑦𝐹𝑥) & ⊢ ((𝑥𝐹𝑦)𝐹𝑧) = (𝑥𝐹(𝑦𝐹𝑧)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴𝐹(𝐵𝐹𝐶)) = (𝐶𝐹(𝐵𝐹𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | caov4 6763* | Rearrange arguments in a commutative, associative operation. (Contributed by NM, 26-Aug-1995.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V & ⊢ (𝑥𝐹𝑦) = (𝑦𝐹𝑥) & ⊢ ((𝑥𝐹𝑦)𝐹𝑧) = (𝑥𝐹(𝑦𝐹𝑧)) & ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴𝐹𝐵)𝐹(𝐶𝐹𝐷)) = ((𝐴𝐹𝐶)𝐹(𝐵𝐹𝐷)) | ||
Theorem | caov411 6764* | Rearrange arguments in a commutative, associative operation. (Contributed by NM, 26-Aug-1995.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V & ⊢ (𝑥𝐹𝑦) = (𝑦𝐹𝑥) & ⊢ ((𝑥𝐹𝑦)𝐹𝑧) = (𝑥𝐹(𝑦𝐹𝑧)) & ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴𝐹𝐵)𝐹(𝐶𝐹𝐷)) = ((𝐶𝐹𝐵)𝐹(𝐴𝐹𝐷)) | ||
Theorem | caov42 6765* | Rearrange arguments in a commutative, associative operation. (Contributed by NM, 26-Aug-1995.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V & ⊢ (𝑥𝐹𝑦) = (𝑦𝐹𝑥) & ⊢ ((𝑥𝐹𝑦)𝐹𝑧) = (𝑥𝐹(𝑦𝐹𝑧)) & ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴𝐹𝐵)𝐹(𝐶𝐹𝐷)) = ((𝐴𝐹𝐶)𝐹(𝐷𝐹𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | caovdir 6766* | Reverse distributive law. (Contributed by NM, 26-Aug-1995.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V & ⊢ (𝑥𝐺𝑦) = (𝑦𝐺𝑥) & ⊢ (𝑥𝐺(𝑦𝐹𝑧)) = ((𝑥𝐺𝑦)𝐹(𝑥𝐺𝑧)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴𝐹𝐵)𝐺𝐶) = ((𝐴𝐺𝐶)𝐹(𝐵𝐺𝐶)) | ||
Theorem | caovdilem 6767* | Lemma used by real number construction. (Contributed by NM, 26-Aug-1995.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V & ⊢ (𝑥𝐺𝑦) = (𝑦𝐺𝑥) & ⊢ (𝑥𝐺(𝑦𝐹𝑧)) = ((𝑥𝐺𝑦)𝐹(𝑥𝐺𝑧)) & ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐻 ∈ V & ⊢ ((𝑥𝐺𝑦)𝐺𝑧) = (𝑥𝐺(𝑦𝐺𝑧)) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝐴𝐺𝐶)𝐹(𝐵𝐺𝐷))𝐺𝐻) = ((𝐴𝐺(𝐶𝐺𝐻))𝐹(𝐵𝐺(𝐷𝐺𝐻))) | ||
Theorem | caovlem2 6768* | Lemma used in real number construction. (Contributed by NM, 26-Aug-1995.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V & ⊢ (𝑥𝐺𝑦) = (𝑦𝐺𝑥) & ⊢ (𝑥𝐺(𝑦𝐹𝑧)) = ((𝑥𝐺𝑦)𝐹(𝑥𝐺𝑧)) & ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐻 ∈ V & ⊢ ((𝑥𝐺𝑦)𝐺𝑧) = (𝑥𝐺(𝑦𝐺𝑧)) & ⊢ 𝑅 ∈ V & ⊢ (𝑥𝐹𝑦) = (𝑦𝐹𝑥) & ⊢ ((𝑥𝐹𝑦)𝐹𝑧) = (𝑥𝐹(𝑦𝐹𝑧)) ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝐴𝐺𝐶)𝐹(𝐵𝐺𝐷))𝐺𝐻)𝐹(((𝐴𝐺𝐷)𝐹(𝐵𝐺𝐶))𝐺𝑅)) = ((𝐴𝐺((𝐶𝐺𝐻)𝐹(𝐷𝐺𝑅)))𝐹(𝐵𝐺((𝐶𝐺𝑅)𝐹(𝐷𝐺𝐻)))) | ||
Theorem | caovmo 6769* | Uniqueness of inverse element in commutative, associative operation with identity. Remark in proof of Proposition 9-2.4 of [Gleason] p. 119. (Contributed by NM, 4-Mar-1996.) |
⊢ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆 & ⊢ dom 𝐹 = (𝑆 × 𝑆) & ⊢ ¬ ∅ ∈ 𝑆 & ⊢ (𝑥𝐹𝑦) = (𝑦𝐹𝑥) & ⊢ ((𝑥𝐹𝑦)𝐹𝑧) = (𝑥𝐹(𝑦𝐹𝑧)) & ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 → (𝑥𝐹𝐵) = 𝑥) ⇒ ⊢ ∃*𝑤(𝐴𝐹𝑤) = 𝐵 | ||
Theorem | grprinvlem 6770* | Lemma for grprinvd 6771. (Contributed by NM, 9-Aug-2013.) |
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑥 + 𝑦) ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑂 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑂 + 𝑥) = 𝑥) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵)) → ((𝑥 + 𝑦) + 𝑧) = (𝑥 + (𝑦 + 𝑧))) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑦 + 𝑥) = 𝑂) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝑋 + 𝑋) = 𝑋) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝑋 = 𝑂) | ||
Theorem | grprinvd 6771* | Deduce right inverse from left inverse and left identity in an associative structure (such as a group). (Contributed by NM, 10-Aug-2013.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 6-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑥 + 𝑦) ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑂 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑂 + 𝑥) = 𝑥) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵)) → ((𝑥 + 𝑦) + 𝑧) = (𝑥 + (𝑦 + 𝑧))) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑦 + 𝑥) = 𝑂) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝑁 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝑁 + 𝑋) = 𝑂) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝑋 + 𝑁) = 𝑂) | ||
Theorem | grpridd 6772* | Deduce right identity from left inverse and left identity in an associative structure (such as a group). (Contributed by NM, 10-Aug-2013.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 6-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑥 + 𝑦) ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑂 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑂 + 𝑥) = 𝑥) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵)) → ((𝑥 + 𝑦) + 𝑧) = (𝑥 + (𝑦 + 𝑧))) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑦 + 𝑥) = 𝑂) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑥 + 𝑂) = 𝑥) | ||
Theorem | mpt2ndm0 6773* | The value of an operation given by a maps-to rule is the empty set if the arguments are not contained in the base sets of the rule. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 12-Oct-2017.) |
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋, 𝑦 ∈ 𝑌 ↦ 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (¬ (𝑉 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝑌) → (𝑉𝐹𝑊) = ∅) | ||
Theorem | elmpt2cl 6774* | If a two-parameter class is not empty, constrain the implicit pair. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 7-Mar-2015.) |
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ (𝑆𝐹𝑇) → (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑇 ∈ 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | elmpt2cl1 6775* | If a two-parameter class is not empty, the first argument is in its nominal domain. (Contributed by FL, 15-Oct-2012.) (Revised by Stefan O'Rear, 7-Mar-2015.) |
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ (𝑆𝐹𝑇) → 𝑆 ∈ 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | elmpt2cl2 6776* | If a two-parameter class is not empty, the second argument is in its nominal domain. (Contributed by FL, 15-Oct-2012.) (Revised by Stefan O'Rear, 7-Mar-2015.) |
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ (𝑆𝐹𝑇) → 𝑇 ∈ 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | elovmpt2 6777* |
Utility lemma for two-parameter classes.
EDITORIAL: can simplify isghm 17483, islmhm 18848. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 21-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ 𝐷 = (𝑎 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V & ⊢ ((𝑎 = 𝑋 ∧ 𝑏 = 𝑌) → 𝐶 = 𝐸) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝐷𝑌) ↔ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝐸)) | ||
Theorem | elovmpt2rab 6778* | Implications for the value of an operation, defined by the maps-to notation with a class abstraction as a result, having an element. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 15-Jul-2018.) |
⊢ 𝑂 = (𝑥 ∈ V, 𝑦 ∈ V ↦ {𝑧 ∈ 𝑀 ∣ 𝜑}) & ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ V ∧ 𝑌 ∈ V) → 𝑀 ∈ V) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝑂𝑌) → (𝑋 ∈ V ∧ 𝑌 ∈ V ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑀)) | ||
Theorem | elovmpt2rab1 6779* | Implications for the value of an operation, defined by the maps-to notation with a class abstraction as a result, having an element. Here, the base set of the class abstraction depends on the first operand. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 15-Jul-2018.) |
⊢ 𝑂 = (𝑥 ∈ V, 𝑦 ∈ V ↦ {𝑧 ∈ ⦋𝑥 / 𝑚⦌𝑀 ∣ 𝜑}) & ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ V ∧ 𝑌 ∈ V) → ⦋𝑋 / 𝑚⦌𝑀 ∈ V) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝑂𝑌) → (𝑋 ∈ V ∧ 𝑌 ∈ V ∧ 𝑍 ∈ ⦋𝑋 / 𝑚⦌𝑀)) | ||
Theorem | 2mpt20 6780* | If the operation value of the operation value of two nested maps-to notation is not empty, all involved arguments belong to the corresponding base classes of the maps-to notations. (Contributed by AV, 21-May-2021.) |
⊢ 𝑂 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐸) & ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋𝑂𝑌) = (𝑠 ∈ 𝐶, 𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ 𝐹)) ⇒ ⊢ (¬ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑇 ∈ 𝐷)) → (𝑆(𝑋𝑂𝑌)𝑇) = ∅) | ||
Theorem | relmptopab 6781* | Any function to sets of ordered pairs produces a relation on function value unconditionally. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Aug-2014.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 24-Dec-2016.) |
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ {〈𝑦, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝜑}) ⇒ ⊢ Rel (𝐹‘𝐵) | ||
Theorem | f1ocnvd 6782* | Describe an implicit one-to-one onto function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-Apr-2015.) |
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑋) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐶) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐷))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵 ∧ ◡𝐹 = (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐷))) | ||
Theorem | f1od 6783* | Describe an implicit one-to-one onto function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-May-2014.) |
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑋) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐶) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐷))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵) | ||
Theorem | f1ocnv2d 6784* | Describe an implicit one-to-one onto function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-Apr-2015.) |
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝐷 ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝑥 = 𝐷 ↔ 𝑦 = 𝐶)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵 ∧ ◡𝐹 = (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐷))) | ||
Theorem | f1o2d 6785* | Describe an implicit one-to-one onto function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-May-2014.) |
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝐷 ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝑥 = 𝐷 ↔ 𝑦 = 𝐶)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵) | ||
Theorem | f1opw2 6786* | A one-to-one mapping induces a one-to-one mapping on power sets. This version of f1opw 6787 avoids the Axiom of Replacement. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-Jun-2015.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (◡𝐹 “ 𝑎) ∈ V) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 “ 𝑏) ∈ V) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑏 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 ↦ (𝐹 “ 𝑏)):𝒫 𝐴–1-1-onto→𝒫 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | f1opw 6787* | A one-to-one mapping induces a one-to-one mapping on power sets. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Nov-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Jun-2015.) |
⊢ (𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵 → (𝑏 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 ↦ (𝐹 “ 𝑏)):𝒫 𝐴–1-1-onto→𝒫 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | elovmpt3imp 6788* | If the value of a function which is the result of an operation defined by the maps-to notation is not empty, the operands must be sets. Remark: a function which is the result of an operation can be regared as operation with 3 operands - therefore the abbreviation "mpt3" is used in the label. (Contributed by AV, 16-May-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑂 = (𝑥 ∈ V, 𝑦 ∈ V ↦ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑀 ↦ 𝐵)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ((𝑋𝑂𝑌)‘𝑍) → (𝑋 ∈ V ∧ 𝑌 ∈ V)) | ||
Theorem | ovmpt3rab1 6789* | The value of an operation defined by the maps-to notation with a function into a class abstraction as a result. The domain of the function and the base set of the class abstraction may depend on the operands, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by AV, 16-Jul-2018.) (Revised by AV, 16-May-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑂 = (𝑥 ∈ V, 𝑦 ∈ V ↦ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑀 ↦ {𝑎 ∈ 𝑁 ∣ 𝜑})) & ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝑋 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑌) → 𝑀 = 𝐾) & ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝑋 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑌) → 𝑁 = 𝐿) & ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝑋 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑌) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜓 ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐾 ∈ 𝑈) → (𝑋𝑂𝑌) = (𝑧 ∈ 𝐾 ↦ {𝑎 ∈ 𝐿 ∣ 𝜓})) | ||
Theorem | ovmpt3rabdm 6790* | If the value of a function which is the result of an operation defined by the maps-to notation is not empty, the operands and the argument of the function must be sets. (Contributed by AV, 16-May-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑂 = (𝑥 ∈ V, 𝑦 ∈ V ↦ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑀 ↦ {𝑎 ∈ 𝑁 ∣ 𝜑})) & ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝑋 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑌) → 𝑀 = 𝐾) & ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝑋 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑌) → 𝑁 = 𝐿) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐾 ∈ 𝑈) ∧ 𝐿 ∈ 𝑇) → dom (𝑋𝑂𝑌) = 𝐾) | ||
Theorem | elovmpt3rab1 6791* | Implications for the value of an operation defined by the maps-to notation with a function into a class abstraction as a result having an element. The domain of the function and the base set of the class abstraction may depend on the operands, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by AV, 16-Jul-2018.) (Revised by AV, 16-May-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑂 = (𝑥 ∈ V, 𝑦 ∈ V ↦ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑀 ↦ {𝑎 ∈ 𝑁 ∣ 𝜑})) & ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝑋 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑌) → 𝑀 = 𝐾) & ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝑋 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑌) → 𝑁 = 𝐿) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝑈 ∧ 𝐿 ∈ 𝑇) → (𝐴 ∈ ((𝑋𝑂𝑌)‘𝑍) → ((𝑋 ∈ V ∧ 𝑌 ∈ V) ∧ (𝑍 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐿)))) | ||
Theorem | elovmpt3rab 6792* | Implications for the value of an operation defined by the maps-to notation with a class abstration as a result having an element. (Contributed by AV, 17-Jul-2018.) (Revised by AV, 16-May-2019.) |
⊢ 𝑂 = (𝑥 ∈ V, 𝑦 ∈ V ↦ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑀 ↦ {𝑎 ∈ 𝑁 ∣ 𝜑})) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ 𝑈 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ 𝑇) → (𝐴 ∈ ((𝑋𝑂𝑌)‘𝑍) → ((𝑋 ∈ V ∧ 𝑌 ∈ V) ∧ (𝑍 ∈ 𝑀 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑁)))) | ||
Syntax | cof 6793 | Extend class notation to include mapping of an operation to a function operation. |
class ∘𝑓 𝑅 | ||
Syntax | cofr 6794 | Extend class notation to include mapping of a binary relation to a function relation. |
class ∘𝑟 𝑅 | ||
Definition | df-of 6795* | Define the function operation map. The definition is designed so that if 𝑅 is a binary operation, then ∘𝑓 𝑅 is the analogous operation on functions which corresponds to applying 𝑅 pointwise to the values of the functions. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Jul-2014.) |
⊢ ∘𝑓 𝑅 = (𝑓 ∈ V, 𝑔 ∈ V ↦ (𝑥 ∈ (dom 𝑓 ∩ dom 𝑔) ↦ ((𝑓‘𝑥)𝑅(𝑔‘𝑥)))) | ||
Definition | df-ofr 6796* | Define the function relation map. The definition is designed so that if 𝑅 is a binary relation, then ∘𝑟 𝑅 is the analogous relation on functions which is true when each element of the left function relates to the corresponding element of the right function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Jul-2014.) |
⊢ ∘𝑟 𝑅 = {〈𝑓, 𝑔〉 ∣ ∀𝑥 ∈ (dom 𝑓 ∩ dom 𝑔)(𝑓‘𝑥)𝑅(𝑔‘𝑥)} | ||
Theorem | ofeq 6797 | Equality theorem for function operation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Jul-2014.) |
⊢ (𝑅 = 𝑆 → ∘𝑓 𝑅 = ∘𝑓 𝑆) | ||
Theorem | ofreq 6798 | Equality theorem for function relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Jul-2014.) |
⊢ (𝑅 = 𝑆 → ∘𝑟 𝑅 = ∘𝑟 𝑆) | ||
Theorem | ofexg 6799 | A function operation restricted to a set is a set. (Contributed by NM, 28-Jul-2014.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ( ∘𝑓 𝑅 ↾ 𝐴) ∈ V) | ||
Theorem | nfof 6800* | Hypothesis builder for function operation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Jul-2014.) |
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝑅 ⇒ ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 ∘𝑓 𝑅 |
< Previous Next > |
Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |