P. 99 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 9801-9900   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	pn0sr 9801	A signed real plus its negative is zero. (Contributed by NM, 14-May-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ R → (𝐴 +R (𝐴 ·R -1R)) = 0R)
Theorem	negexsr 9802*	Existence of negative signed real. Part of Proposition 9-4.3 of [Gleason] p. 126. (Contributed by NM, 2-May-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ R → ∃𝑥 ∈ R (𝐴 +R 𝑥) = 0R)
Theorem	recexsrlem 9803*	The reciprocal of a positive signed real exists. Part of Proposition 9-4.3 of [Gleason] p. 126. (Contributed by NM, 15-May-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (0R <R 𝐴 → ∃𝑥 ∈ R (𝐴 ·R 𝑥) = 1R)
Theorem	addgt0sr 9804	The sum of two positive signed reals is positive. (Contributed by NM, 14-May-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((0R <R 𝐴 ∧ 0R <R 𝐵) → 0R <R (𝐴 +R 𝐵))
Theorem	mulgt0sr 9805	The product of two positive signed reals is positive. (Contributed by NM, 13-May-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((0R <R 𝐴 ∧ 0R <R 𝐵) → 0R <R (𝐴 ·R 𝐵))
Theorem	sqgt0sr 9806	The square of a nonzero signed real is positive. (Contributed by NM, 14-May-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ R ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 0R) → 0R <R (𝐴 ·R 𝐴))
Theorem	recexsr 9807*	The reciprocal of a nonzero signed real exists. Part of Proposition 9-4.3 of [Gleason] p. 126. (Contributed by NM, 15-May-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ R ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 0R) → ∃𝑥 ∈ R (𝐴 ·R 𝑥) = 1R)
Theorem	mappsrpr 9808	Mapping from positive signed reals to positive reals. (Contributed by NM, 17-May-1996.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Jun-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐶 ∈ R    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐶 +R -1R) <R (𝐶 +R [⟨𝐴, 1P⟩] ~R ) ↔ 𝐴 ∈ P)
Theorem	ltpsrpr 9809	Mapping of order from positive signed reals to positive reals. (Contributed by NM, 17-May-1996.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Jun-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐶 ∈ R    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐶 +R [⟨𝐴, 1P⟩] ~R ) <R (𝐶 +R [⟨𝐵, 1P⟩] ~R ) ↔ 𝐴<P 𝐵)
Theorem	map2psrpr 9810*	Equivalence for positive signed real. (Contributed by NM, 17-May-1996.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Jun-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐶 ∈ R    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐶 +R -1R) <R 𝐴 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ P (𝐶 +R [⟨𝑥, 1P⟩] ~R ) = 𝐴)
Theorem	supsrlem 9811*	Lemma for supremum theorem. (Contributed by NM, 21-May-1996.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Jun-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑤 ∣ (𝐶 +R [⟨𝑤, 1P⟩] ~R ) ∈ 𝐴}    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ R    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ R ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 <R 𝑥) → ∃𝑥 ∈ R (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <R 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ R (𝑦 <R 𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 <R 𝑧)))
Theorem	supsr 9812*	A nonempty, bounded set of signed reals has a supremum. (Contributed by NM, 21-May-1996.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Jun-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ R ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 <R 𝑥) → ∃𝑥 ∈ R (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <R 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ R (𝑦 <R 𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 <R 𝑧)))
Syntax	cc 9813	Class of complex numbers.
class ℂ
Syntax	cr 9814	Class of real numbers.
class ℝ
Syntax	cc0 9815	Extend class notation to include the complex number 0.
class 0
Syntax	c1 9816	Extend class notation to include the complex number 1.
class 1
Syntax	ci 9817	Extend class notation to include the complex number i.
class i
Syntax	caddc 9818	Addition on complex numbers.
class +
Syntax	cltrr 9819	'Less than' predicate (defined over real subset of complex numbers).
class <ℝ
Syntax	cmul 9820	Multiplication on complex numbers. The token · is a center dot.
class ·
Definition	df-c 9821	Define the set of complex numbers. The 23 axioms for complex numbers start at axresscn 9848. (Contributed by NM, 22-Feb-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ℂ = (R × R)
Definition	df-0 9822	Define the complex number 0. (Contributed by NM, 22-Feb-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 0 = ⟨0R, 0R⟩
Definition	df-1 9823	Define the complex number 1. (Contributed by NM, 22-Feb-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 1 = ⟨1R, 0R⟩
Definition	df-i 9824	Define the complex number i (the imaginary unit). (Contributed by NM, 22-Feb-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ i = ⟨0R, 1R⟩
Definition	df-r 9825	Define the set of real numbers. (Contributed by NM, 22-Feb-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ℝ = (R × {0R})
Definition	df-add 9826*	Define addition over complex numbers. (Contributed by NM, 28-May-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ + = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ℂ) ∧ ∃𝑤∃𝑣∃𝑢∃𝑓((𝑥 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑣⟩ ∧ 𝑦 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑓⟩) ∧ 𝑧 = ⟨(𝑤 +R 𝑢), (𝑣 +R 𝑓)⟩))}
Definition	df-mul 9827*	Define multiplication over complex numbers. (Contributed by NM, 9-Aug-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ · = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ℂ) ∧ ∃𝑤∃𝑣∃𝑢∃𝑓((𝑥 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑣⟩ ∧ 𝑦 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑓⟩) ∧ 𝑧 = ⟨((𝑤 ·R 𝑢) +R (-1R ·R (𝑣 ·R 𝑓))), ((𝑣 ·R 𝑢) +R (𝑤 ·R 𝑓))⟩))}
Definition	df-lt 9828*	Define 'less than' on the real subset of complex numbers. Proofs should typically use < instead; see df-ltxr 9958. (Contributed by NM, 22-Feb-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ <ℝ = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ℝ) ∧ ∃𝑧∃𝑤((𝑥 = ⟨𝑧, 0R⟩ ∧ 𝑦 = ⟨𝑤, 0R⟩) ∧ 𝑧 <R 𝑤))}
Theorem	opelcn 9829	Ordered pair membership in the class of complex numbers. (Contributed by NM, 14-May-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ ℂ ↔ (𝐴 ∈ R ∧ 𝐵 ∈ R))
Theorem	opelreal 9830	Ordered pair membership in class of real subset of complex numbers. (Contributed by NM, 22-Feb-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (⟨𝐴, 0R⟩ ∈ ℝ ↔ 𝐴 ∈ R)
Theorem	elreal 9831*	Membership in class of real numbers. (Contributed by NM, 31-Mar-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ R ⟨𝑥, 0R⟩ = 𝐴)
Theorem	elreal2 9832	Ordered pair membership in the class of complex numbers. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Jun-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ ↔ ((1st ‘𝐴) ∈ R ∧ 𝐴 = ⟨(1st ‘𝐴), 0R⟩))
Theorem	0ncn 9833	The empty set is not a complex number. Note: do not use this after the real number axioms are developed, since it is a construction-dependent property. (Contributed by NM, 2-May-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ¬ ∅ ∈ ℂ
Theorem	ltrelre 9834	'Less than' is a relation on real numbers. (Contributed by NM, 22-Feb-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ <ℝ ⊆ (ℝ × ℝ)
Theorem	addcnsr 9835	Addition of complex numbers in terms of signed reals. (Contributed by NM, 28-May-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ R ∧ 𝐵 ∈ R) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ R ∧ 𝐷 ∈ R)) → (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ + ⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩) = ⟨(𝐴 +R 𝐶), (𝐵 +R 𝐷)⟩)
Theorem	mulcnsr 9836	Multiplication of complex numbers in terms of signed reals. (Contributed by NM, 9-Aug-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ R ∧ 𝐵 ∈ R) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ R ∧ 𝐷 ∈ R)) → (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ · ⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩) = ⟨((𝐴 ·R 𝐶) +R (-1R ·R (𝐵 ·R 𝐷))), ((𝐵 ·R 𝐶) +R (𝐴 ·R 𝐷))⟩)
Theorem	eqresr 9837	Equality of real numbers in terms of intermediate signed reals. (Contributed by NM, 10-May-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (⟨𝐴, 0R⟩ = ⟨𝐵, 0R⟩ ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵)
Theorem	addresr 9838	Addition of real numbers in terms of intermediate signed reals. (Contributed by NM, 10-May-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ R ∧ 𝐵 ∈ R) → (⟨𝐴, 0R⟩ + ⟨𝐵, 0R⟩) = ⟨(𝐴 +R 𝐵), 0R⟩)
Theorem	mulresr 9839	Multiplication of real numbers in terms of intermediate signed reals. (Contributed by NM, 10-May-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ R ∧ 𝐵 ∈ R) → (⟨𝐴, 0R⟩ · ⟨𝐵, 0R⟩) = ⟨(𝐴 ·R 𝐵), 0R⟩)
Theorem	ltresr 9840	Ordering of real subset of complex numbers in terms of signed reals. (Contributed by NM, 22-Feb-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (⟨𝐴, 0R⟩ <ℝ ⟨𝐵, 0R⟩ ↔ 𝐴 <R 𝐵)
Theorem	ltresr2 9841	Ordering of real subset of complex numbers in terms of signed reals. (Contributed by NM, 22-Feb-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 <ℝ 𝐵 ↔ (1st ‘𝐴) <R (1st ‘𝐵)))
Theorem	dfcnqs 9842	Technical trick to permit reuse of previous lemmas to prove arithmetic operation laws in ℂ from those in R. The trick involves qsid 7700, which shows that the coset of the converse epsilon relation (which is not an equivalence relation) acts as an identity divisor for the quotient set operation. This lets us "pretend" that ℂ is a quotient set, even though it is not (compare df-c 9821), and allows us to reuse some of the equivalence class lemmas we developed for the transition from positive reals to signed reals, etc. (Contributed by NM, 13-Aug-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ℂ = ((R × R) / ◡ E )
Theorem	addcnsrec 9843	Technical trick to permit re-use of some equivalence class lemmas for operation laws. See dfcnqs 9842 and mulcnsrec 9844. (Contributed by NM, 13-Aug-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ R ∧ 𝐵 ∈ R) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ R ∧ 𝐷 ∈ R)) → ([⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩]◡ E + [⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩]◡ E ) = [⟨(𝐴 +R 𝐶), (𝐵 +R 𝐷)⟩]◡ E )
Theorem	mulcnsrec 9844	Technical trick to permit re-use of some equivalence class lemmas for operation laws. The trick involves ecid 7699, which shows that the coset of the converse epsilon relation (which is not an equivalence relation) leaves a set unchanged. See also dfcnqs 9842. Note: This is the last lemma (from which the axioms will be derived) in the construction of real and complex numbers. The construction starts at cnpi 9545. (Contributed by NM, 13-Aug-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ R ∧ 𝐵 ∈ R) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ R ∧ 𝐷 ∈ R)) → ([⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩]◡ E · [⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩]◡ E ) = [⟨((𝐴 ·R 𝐶) +R (-1R ·R (𝐵 ·R 𝐷))), ((𝐵 ·R 𝐶) +R (𝐴 ·R 𝐷))⟩]◡ E )
5.1.2  Final derivation of real and complex number postulates
Theorem	axaddf 9845	Addition is an operation on the complex numbers. This theorem can be used as an alternate axiom for complex numbers in place of the less specific axaddcl 9851. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-addf 9894. (Contributed by NM, 8-Feb-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ + :(ℂ × ℂ)⟶ℂ
Theorem	axmulf 9846	Multiplication is an operation on the complex numbers. This theorem can be used as an alternate axiom for complex numbers in place of the less specific axmulcl 9853. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-mulf 9895. (Contributed by NM, 8-Feb-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ · :(ℂ × ℂ)⟶ℂ
Theorem	axcnex 9847	The complex numbers form a set. This axiom is redundant in the presence of the other axioms (see cnexALT 11704), but the proof requires the axiom of replacement, while the derivation from the construction here does not. Thus, we can avoid ax-rep 4699 in later theorems by invoking the axiom ax-cnex 9871 instead of cnexALT 11704. Use cnex 9896 instead. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ℂ ∈ V
Theorem	axresscn 9848	The real numbers are a subset of the complex numbers. Axiom 1 of 22 for real and complex numbers, derived from ZF set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-resscn 9872. (Contributed by NM, 1-Mar-1995.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 12-Aug-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ℝ ⊆ ℂ
Theorem	ax1cn 9849	1 is a complex number. Axiom 2 of 22 for real and complex numbers, derived from ZF set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-1cn 9873. (Contributed by NM, 12-Apr-2007.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 1 ∈ ℂ
Theorem	axicn 9850	i is a complex number. Axiom 3 of 22 for real and complex numbers, derived from ZF set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-icn 9874. (Contributed by NM, 23-Feb-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ i ∈ ℂ
Theorem	axaddcl 9851	Closure law for addition of complex numbers. Axiom 4 of 22 for real and complex numbers, derived from ZF set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly, nor should the proven axiom ax-addcl 9875 be used later. Instead, in most cases use addcl 9897. (Contributed by NM, 14-Jun-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴 + 𝐵) ∈ ℂ)
Theorem	axaddrcl 9852	Closure law for addition in the real subfield of complex numbers. Axiom 5 of 22 for real and complex numbers, derived from ZF set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly, nor should the proven axiom ax-addrcl 9876 be used later. Instead, in most cases use readdcl 9898. (Contributed by NM, 31-Mar-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 + 𝐵) ∈ ℝ)
Theorem	axmulcl 9853	Closure law for multiplication of complex numbers. Axiom 6 of 22 for real and complex numbers, derived from ZF set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly, nor should the proven axiom ax-mulcl 9877 be used later. Instead, in most cases use mulcl 9899. (Contributed by NM, 10-Aug-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴 · 𝐵) ∈ ℂ)
Theorem	axmulrcl 9854	Closure law for multiplication in the real subfield of complex numbers. Axiom 7 of 22 for real and complex numbers, derived from ZF set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly, nor should the proven axiom ax-mulrcl 9878 be used later. Instead, in most cases use remulcl 9900. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 31-Mar-1996.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 · 𝐵) ∈ ℝ)
Theorem	axmulcom 9855	Multiplication of complex numbers is commutative. Axiom 8 of 22 for real and complex numbers, derived from ZF set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly, nor should the proven axiom ax-mulcom 9879 be used later. Instead, use mulcom 9901. (Contributed by NM, 31-Aug-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴 · 𝐵) = (𝐵 · 𝐴))
Theorem	axaddass 9856	Addition of complex numbers is associative. This theorem transfers the associative laws for the real and imaginary signed real components of complex number pairs, to complex number addition itself. Axiom 9 of 22 for real and complex numbers, derived from ZF set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly, nor should the proven axiom ax-addass 9880 be used later. Instead, use addass 9902. (Contributed by NM, 2-Sep-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → ((𝐴 + 𝐵) + 𝐶) = (𝐴 + (𝐵 + 𝐶)))
Theorem	axmulass 9857	Multiplication of complex numbers is associative. Axiom 10 of 22 for real and complex numbers, derived from ZF set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-mulass 9881. (Contributed by NM, 3-Sep-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → ((𝐴 · 𝐵) · 𝐶) = (𝐴 · (𝐵 · 𝐶)))
Theorem	axdistr 9858	Distributive law for complex numbers (left-distributivity). Axiom 11 of 22 for real and complex numbers, derived from ZF set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly, nor should the proven axiom ax-distr 9882 be used later. Instead, use adddi 9904. (Contributed by NM, 2-Sep-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴 · (𝐵 + 𝐶)) = ((𝐴 · 𝐵) + (𝐴 · 𝐶)))
Theorem	axi2m1 9859	i-squared equals -1 (expressed as i-squared plus 1 is 0). Axiom 12 of 22 for real and complex numbers, derived from ZF set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-i2m1 9883. (Contributed by NM, 5-May-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((i · i) + 1) = 0
Theorem	ax1ne0 9860	1 and 0 are distinct. Axiom 13 of 22 for real and complex numbers, derived from ZF set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-1ne0 9884. (Contributed by NM, 19-Mar-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 1 ≠ 0
Theorem	ax1rid 9861	1 is an identity element for real multiplication. Axiom 14 of 22 for real and complex numbers, derived from ZF set theory. Weakened from the original axiom in the form of statement in mulid1 9916, based on ideas by Eric Schmidt. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-1rid 9885. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Jan-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → (𝐴 · 1) = 𝐴)
Theorem	axrnegex 9862*	Existence of negative of real number. Axiom 15 of 22 for real and complex numbers, derived from ZF set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-rnegex 9886. (Contributed by NM, 15-May-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ (𝐴 + 𝑥) = 0)
Theorem	axrrecex 9863*	Existence of reciprocal of nonzero real number. Axiom 16 of 22 for real and complex numbers, derived from ZF set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-rrecex 9887. (Contributed by NM, 15-May-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 0) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ (𝐴 · 𝑥) = 1)
Theorem	axcnre 9864*	A complex number can be expressed in terms of two reals. Definition 10-1.1(v) of [Gleason] p. 130. Axiom 17 of 22 for real and complex numbers, derived from ZF set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-cnre 9888. (Contributed by NM, 13-May-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℝ 𝐴 = (𝑥 + (i · 𝑦)))
Theorem	axpre-lttri 9865	Ordering on reals satisfies strict trichotomy. Axiom 18 of 22 for real and complex numbers, derived from ZF set theory. Note: The more general version for extended reals is axlttri 9988. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-pre-lttri 9889. (Contributed by NM, 19-May-1996.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jun-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 <ℝ 𝐵 ↔ ¬ (𝐴 = 𝐵 ∨ 𝐵 <ℝ 𝐴)))
Theorem	axpre-lttrn 9866	Ordering on reals is transitive. Axiom 19 of 22 for real and complex numbers, derived from ZF set theory. Note: The more general version for extended reals is axlttrn 9989. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-pre-lttrn 9890. (Contributed by NM, 19-May-1996.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jun-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → ((𝐴 <ℝ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 <ℝ 𝐶) → 𝐴 <ℝ 𝐶))
Theorem	axpre-ltadd 9867	Ordering property of addition on reals. Axiom 20 of 22 for real and complex numbers, derived from ZF set theory. Note: The more general version for extended reals is axltadd 9990. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-pre-ltadd 9891. (Contributed by NM, 11-May-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 <ℝ 𝐵 → (𝐶 + 𝐴) <ℝ (𝐶 + 𝐵)))
Theorem	axpre-mulgt0 9868	The product of two positive reals is positive. Axiom 21 of 22 for real and complex numbers, derived from ZF set theory. Note: The more general version for extended reals is axmulgt0 9991. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-pre-mulgt0 9892. (Contributed by NM, 13-May-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → ((0 <ℝ 𝐴 ∧ 0 <ℝ 𝐵) → 0 <ℝ (𝐴 · 𝐵)))
Theorem	axpre-sup 9869*	A nonempty, bounded-above set of reals has a supremum. Axiom 22 of 22 for real and complex numbers, derived from ZF set theory. Note: The more general version with ordering on extended reals is axsup 9992. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-pre-sup 9893. (Contributed by NM, 19-May-1996.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jun-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 <ℝ 𝑥) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <ℝ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ (𝑦 <ℝ 𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 <ℝ 𝑧)))
Theorem	wuncn 9870	A weak universe containing ω contains the complex number construction. This theorem is construction-dependent in the literal sense, but will also be satisfied by any other reasonable implementation of the complex numbers. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Jan-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ WUni)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ω ∈ 𝑈)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ℂ ∈ 𝑈)
5.1.3  Real and complex number postulates restated as axioms
Axiom	ax-cnex 9871	The complex numbers form a set. This axiom is redundant - see cnexALT 11704- but we provide this axiom because the justification theorem axcnex 9847 does not use ax-rep 4699 even though the redundancy proof does. Proofs should normally use cnex 9896 instead. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 1-Mar-1995.)
⊢ ℂ ∈ V
Axiom	ax-resscn 9872	The real numbers are a subset of the complex numbers. Axiom 1 of 22 for real and complex numbers, justified by theorem axresscn 9848. (Contributed by NM, 1-Mar-1995.)
⊢ ℝ ⊆ ℂ
Axiom	ax-1cn 9873	1 is a complex number. Axiom 2 of 22 for real and complex numbers, justified by theorem ax1cn 9849. (Contributed by NM, 1-Mar-1995.)
⊢ 1 ∈ ℂ
Axiom	ax-icn 9874	i is a complex number. Axiom 3 of 22 for real and complex numbers, justified by theorem axicn 9850. (Contributed by NM, 1-Mar-1995.)
⊢ i ∈ ℂ
Axiom	ax-addcl 9875	Closure law for addition of complex numbers. Axiom 4 of 22 for real and complex numbers, justified by theorem axaddcl 9851. Proofs should normally use addcl 9897 instead, which asserts the same thing but follows our naming conventions for closures. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 22-Nov-1994.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴 + 𝐵) ∈ ℂ)
Axiom	ax-addrcl 9876	Closure law for addition in the real subfield of complex numbers. Axiom 6 of 23 for real and complex numbers, justified by theorem axaddrcl 9852. Proofs should normally use readdcl 9898 instead. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 22-Nov-1994.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 + 𝐵) ∈ ℝ)
Axiom	ax-mulcl 9877	Closure law for multiplication of complex numbers. Axiom 6 of 22 for real and complex numbers, justified by theorem axmulcl 9853. Proofs should normally use mulcl 9899 instead. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 22-Nov-1994.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴 · 𝐵) ∈ ℂ)
Axiom	ax-mulrcl 9878	Closure law for multiplication in the real subfield of complex numbers. Axiom 7 of 22 for real and complex numbers, justified by theorem axmulrcl 9854. Proofs should normally use remulcl 9900 instead. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 22-Nov-1994.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 · 𝐵) ∈ ℝ)
Axiom	ax-mulcom 9879	Multiplication of complex numbers is commutative. Axiom 8 of 22 for real and complex numbers, justified by theorem axmulcom 9855. Proofs should normally use mulcom 9901 instead. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 22-Nov-1994.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴 · 𝐵) = (𝐵 · 𝐴))
Axiom	ax-addass 9880	Addition of complex numbers is associative. Axiom 9 of 22 for real and complex numbers, justified by theorem axaddass 9856. Proofs should normally use addass 9902 instead. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 22-Nov-1994.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → ((𝐴 + 𝐵) + 𝐶) = (𝐴 + (𝐵 + 𝐶)))
Axiom	ax-mulass 9881	Multiplication of complex numbers is associative. Axiom 10 of 22 for real and complex numbers, justified by theorem axmulass 9857. Proofs should normally use mulass 9903 instead. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 22-Nov-1994.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → ((𝐴 · 𝐵) · 𝐶) = (𝐴 · (𝐵 · 𝐶)))
Axiom	ax-distr 9882	Distributive law for complex numbers (left-distributivity). Axiom 11 of 22 for real and complex numbers, justified by theorem axdistr 9858. Proofs should normally use adddi 9904 instead. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 22-Nov-1994.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴 · (𝐵 + 𝐶)) = ((𝐴 · 𝐵) + (𝐴 · 𝐶)))
Axiom	ax-i2m1 9883	i-squared equals -1 (expressed as i-squared plus 1 is 0). Axiom 12 of 22 for real and complex numbers, justified by theorem axi2m1 9859. (Contributed by NM, 29-Jan-1995.)
⊢ ((i · i) + 1) = 0
Axiom	ax-1ne0 9884	1 and 0 are distinct. Axiom 13 of 22 for real and complex numbers, justified by theorem ax1ne0 9860. (Contributed by NM, 29-Jan-1995.)
⊢ 1 ≠ 0
Axiom	ax-1rid 9885	1 is an identity element for real multiplication. Axiom 14 of 22 for real and complex numbers, justified by theorem ax1rid 9861. Weakened from the original axiom in the form of statement in mulid1 9916, based on ideas by Eric Schmidt. (Contributed by NM, 29-Jan-1995.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → (𝐴 · 1) = 𝐴)
Axiom	ax-rnegex 9886*	Existence of negative of real number. Axiom 15 of 22 for real and complex numbers, justified by theorem axrnegex 9862. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 21-May-2007.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ (𝐴 + 𝑥) = 0)
Axiom	ax-rrecex 9887*	Existence of reciprocal of nonzero real number. Axiom 16 of 22 for real and complex numbers, justified by theorem axrrecex 9863. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 11-Apr-2007.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 0) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ (𝐴 · 𝑥) = 1)
Axiom	ax-cnre 9888*	A complex number can be expressed in terms of two reals. Definition 10-1.1(v) of [Gleason] p. 130. Axiom 17 of 22 for real and complex numbers, justified by theorem axcnre 9864. For naming consistency, use cnre 9915 for new proofs. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 9-May-1999.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℝ 𝐴 = (𝑥 + (i · 𝑦)))
Axiom	ax-pre-lttri 9889	Ordering on reals satisfies strict trichotomy. Axiom 18 of 22 for real and complex numbers, justified by theorem axpre-lttri 9865. Note: The more general version for extended reals is axlttri 9988. Normally new proofs would use xrlttri 11848. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2005.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 <ℝ 𝐵 ↔ ¬ (𝐴 = 𝐵 ∨ 𝐵 <ℝ 𝐴)))
Axiom	ax-pre-lttrn 9890	Ordering on reals is transitive. Axiom 19 of 22 for real and complex numbers, justified by theorem axpre-lttrn 9866. Note: The more general version for extended reals is axlttrn 9989. Normally new proofs would use lttr 9993. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2005.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → ((𝐴 <ℝ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 <ℝ 𝐶) → 𝐴 <ℝ 𝐶))
Axiom	ax-pre-ltadd 9891	Ordering property of addition on reals. Axiom 20 of 22 for real and complex numbers, justified by theorem axpre-ltadd 9867. Normally new proofs would use axltadd 9990. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2005.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 <ℝ 𝐵 → (𝐶 + 𝐴) <ℝ (𝐶 + 𝐵)))
Axiom	ax-pre-mulgt0 9892	The product of two positive reals is positive. Axiom 21 of 22 for real and complex numbers, justified by theorem axpre-mulgt0 9868. Normally new proofs would use axmulgt0 9991. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2005.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → ((0 <ℝ 𝐴 ∧ 0 <ℝ 𝐵) → 0 <ℝ (𝐴 · 𝐵)))
Axiom	ax-pre-sup 9893*	A nonempty, bounded-above set of reals has a supremum. Axiom 22 of 22 for real and complex numbers, justified by theorem axpre-sup 9869. Note: Normally new proofs would use axsup 9992. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2005.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 <ℝ 𝑥) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <ℝ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ (𝑦 <ℝ 𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 <ℝ 𝑧)))
Axiom	ax-addf 9894	Addition is an operation on the complex numbers. This deprecated axiom is provided for historical compatibility but is not a bona fide axiom for complex numbers (independent of set theory) since it cannot be interpreted as a first- or second-order statement (see http://us.metamath.org/downloads/schmidt-cnaxioms.pdf). It may be deleted in the future and should be avoided for new theorems. Instead, the less specific addcl 9897 should be used. Note that uses of ax-addf 9894 can be eliminated by using the defined operation (𝑥 ∈ ℂ, 𝑦 ∈ ℂ ↦ (𝑥 + 𝑦)) in place of +, from which this axiom (with the defined operation in place of +) follows as a theorem. This axiom is justified by theorem axaddf 9845. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-2004.)
⊢ + :(ℂ × ℂ)⟶ℂ
Axiom	ax-mulf 9895	Multiplication is an operation on the complex numbers. This deprecated axiom is provided for historical compatibility but is not a bona fide axiom for complex numbers (independent of set theory) since it cannot be interpreted as a first- or second-order statement (see http://us.metamath.org/downloads/schmidt-cnaxioms.pdf). It may be deleted in the future and should be avoided for new theorems. Instead, the less specific ax-mulcl 9877 should be used. Note that uses of ax-mulf 9895 can be eliminated by using the defined operation (𝑥 ∈ ℂ, 𝑦 ∈ ℂ ↦ (𝑥 · 𝑦)) in place of ·, from which this axiom (with the defined operation in place of ·) follows as a theorem. This axiom is justified by theorem axmulf 9846. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-2004.)
⊢ · :(ℂ × ℂ)⟶ℂ
5.2  Derive the basic properties from the field axioms
5.2.1  Some deductions from the field axioms for complex numbers
Theorem	cnex 9896	Alias for ax-cnex 9871. See also cnexALT 11704. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.)
⊢ ℂ ∈ V
Theorem	addcl 9897	Alias for ax-addcl 9875, for naming consistency with addcli 9923. Use this theorem instead of ax-addcl 9875 or axaddcl 9851. (Contributed by NM, 10-Mar-2008.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴 + 𝐵) ∈ ℂ)
Theorem	readdcl 9898	Alias for ax-addrcl 9876, for naming consistency with readdcli 9932. (Contributed by NM, 10-Mar-2008.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 + 𝐵) ∈ ℝ)
Theorem	mulcl 9899	Alias for ax-mulcl 9877, for naming consistency with mulcli 9924. (Contributed by NM, 10-Mar-2008.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴 · 𝐵) ∈ ℂ)
Theorem	remulcl 9900	Alias for ax-mulrcl 9878, for naming consistency with remulcli 9933. (Contributed by NM, 10-Mar-2008.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 · 𝐵) ∈ ℝ)