P. 23 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 2201-2300   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	19.21tOLD 2201	Obsolete proof of 19.21t 2061 as of 6-Oct-2021. (Contributed by NM, 27-May-1997.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Sep-2016.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 3-Jan-2018.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (Ⅎ𝑥𝜑 → (∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓) ↔ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜓)))
Theorem	19.21OLD 2202	Obsolete proof of 19.21 2062 as of 6-Oct-2021. (Contributed by NM, 14-May-1993.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Sep-2016.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓) ↔ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜓))
Theorem	19.21-2OLD 2203	Obsolete proof of 19.21-2 2065 as of 6-Oct-2021. (Contributed by NM, 4-Feb-2005.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → 𝜓) ↔ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥∀𝑦𝜓))
Theorem	19.21hOLD 2204	Obsolete proof of 19.21h 2107 as of 6-Oct-2021. (Contributed by NM, 1-Aug-2017.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 1-Jan-2018.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑)    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓) ↔ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜓))
Theorem	stdpc5OLDOLD 2205	Obsolete proof of stdpc5 2063 as of 6-Oct-2021. (Contributed by NM, 22-Sep-1993.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 12-Oct-2016.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 1-Jan-2018.) Remove dependency on ax-10 2006. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 4-Jul-2021.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓) → (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜓))
Theorem	19.23tOLD 2206	Obsolete proof of 19.23t 2066 as of 6-Oct-2021. (Contributed by NM, 7-Nov-2005.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 2-Jan-2018.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 13-Aug-2020.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (Ⅎ𝑥𝜓 → (∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓) ↔ (∃𝑥𝜑 → 𝜓)))
Theorem	19.23OLD 2207	Obsolete proof of 19.23 2067 as of 6-Oct-2021. (Contributed by NM, 24-Jan-1993.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Sep-2016.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓) ↔ (∃𝑥𝜑 → 𝜓))
Theorem	19.23hOLD 2208	Obsolete proof of 19.23h 2108 as of 6-Oct-2021. (Contributed by NM, 24-Jan-1993.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Sep-2016.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 1-Jan-2018.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓) ↔ (∃𝑥𝜑 → 𝜓))
Theorem	exlimiOLD 2209	Obsolete proof of exlimi 2073 as of 6-Oct-2021. (Contributed by NM, 10-Jan-1993.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Sep-2016.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥𝜑 → 𝜓)
Theorem	exlimihOLD 2210	Obsolete proof of exlimih 2133 as of 6-Oct-2021. (Contributed by NM, 10-Jan-1993.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 13-May-2011.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 1-Jan-2018.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥𝜑 → 𝜓)
Theorem	exlimdOLD 2211	Obsolete proof of exlimd 2074 as of 6-Oct-2021. (Contributed by NM, 23-Jan-1993.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Sep-2016.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 12-Jan-2018.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜒    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥𝜓 → 𝜒))
Theorem	exlimdhOLD 2212	Obsolete proof of exlimdh 2134 as of 6-Oct-2021. (Contributed by NM, 28-Jan-1997.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑)    &   ⊢ (𝜒 → ∀𝑥𝜒)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥𝜓 → 𝜒))
Theorem	nfdiOLD 2213	Obsolete proof of nf5di 2105 as of 6-Oct-2021. (Contributed by NM, 17-Aug-2018.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 10-Jul-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜑)    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑
Theorem	nfimdOLD 2214	Obsolete proof of nfimd 1812 as of 6-Oct-2021. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Sep-2016.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 30-Dec-2017.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜒)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥(𝜓 → 𝜒))
Theorem	hbim1OLD 2215	Obsolete proof of hbim 2112 as of 6-Oct-2021. (Contributed by NM, 2-Jun-1993.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 → 𝜓) → ∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓))
Theorem	nfim1OLD 2216	Obsolete proof of nfim1 2055 as of 6-Oct-2021. (Contributed by NM, 2-Jun-1993.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Sep-2016.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 2-Jan-2018.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓)
Theorem	nfimOLD 2217	Obsolete proof of nfim 1813 as of 6-Oct-2021. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 2-Jan-2018.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓)
Theorem	hbimdOLD 2218	Obsolete proof of hbimd 2111 as of 6-Oct-2021. (Contributed by NM, 14-May-1993.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 3-Jan-2018.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 → ∀𝑥𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜓 → 𝜒) → ∀𝑥(𝜓 → 𝜒)))
Theorem	hbimOLD 2219	Obsolete proof of hbim 2112 as of 6-Oct-2021. (Contributed by NM, 24-Jan-1993.) (Proof shortened by Mel L. O'Cat, 3-Mar-2008.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 1-Jan-2018.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑)    &   ⊢ (𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 → 𝜓) → ∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓))
Theorem	nfandOLD 2220	Obsolete proof of nfand 1814 as of 6-Oct-2021. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Oct-2016.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜒)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥(𝜓 ∧ 𝜒))
Theorem	nf3andOLD 2221	Obsolete proof of nf3and 1815 as of 6-Oct-2021. (Contributed by NM, 17-Feb-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 16-Oct-2016.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜒)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜃)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥(𝜓 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜃))
Theorem	19.27OLD 2222	Obsolete proof of 19.27 2082 as of 6-Oct-2021. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-1993.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (∀𝑥𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))
Theorem	19.28OLD 2223	Obsolete proof of 19.28 2083 as of 6-Oct-2021. (Contributed by NM, 1-Aug-1993.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑥𝜓))
Theorem	nfan1OLD 2224	Obsolete proof of nfan1 2056 as of 6-Oct-2021. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Oct-2016.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)
Theorem	nfanOLDOLD 2225	Obsolete proof of nfan 1816 as of 6-Oct-2021. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 13-Jan-2018.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)
Theorem	nfnanOLD 2226	Obsolete proof of nfnan 1818 as of 6-Oct-2021. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 2-Jan-2018.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(𝜑 ⊼ 𝜓)
Theorem	nf3anOLD 2227	Obsolete proof of nf3an 1819 as of 6-Oct-2021. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜒    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)
Theorem	hbanOLD 2228	Obsolete proof of hban 2113 as of 6-Oct-2021. (Contributed by NM, 14-May-1993.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 2-Jan-2018.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑)    &   ⊢ (𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → ∀𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))
Theorem	hb3anOLD 2229	Obsolete proof of hb3an 2114 as of 6-Oct-2021. (Contributed by NM, 14-Sep-2003.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 2-Jan-2018.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑)    &   ⊢ (𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝜒 → ∀𝑥𝜒)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → ∀𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒))
Theorem	nfbidOLD 2230	Obsolete proof of nfbid 1820 as of 6-Oct-2021. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Sep-2016.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 29-Dec-2017.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜒)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥(𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))
Theorem	nfbiOLD 2231	Obsolete proof of nfbi 1821 as of 6-Oct-2021. (Contributed by NM, 26-May-1993.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 2-Jan-2018.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)
Theorem	nforOLD 2232	Obsolete proof of nfor 1822 as of 6-Oct-2021. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(𝜑 ∨ 𝜓)
Theorem	nf3orOLD 2233	Obsolete proof of nf3or 1823 as of 6-Oct-2021. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜒    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(𝜑 ∨ 𝜓 ∨ 𝜒)
1.5.4  Axiom scheme ax-13 (Quantified Equality)
Axiom	ax-13 2234	Axiom of Quantified Equality. One of the equality and substitution axioms of predicate calculus with equality. An equivalent way to express this axiom that may be easier to understand is (¬ 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (¬ 𝑥 = 𝑧 → (𝑦 = 𝑧 → ∀𝑥𝑦 = 𝑧))) (see ax13b 1951). Recall that in the intended interpretation, our variables are metavariables ranging over the variables of predicate calculus (the object language). In order for the first antecedent ¬ 𝑥 = 𝑦 to hold, 𝑥 and 𝑦 must have different values and thus cannot be the same object-language variable (so they are effectively "distinct variables" even though no $d is present). Similarly, 𝑥 and 𝑧 cannot be the same object-language variable. Therefore, 𝑥 will not occur in the wff 𝑦 = 𝑧 when the first two antecedents hold, so analogous to ax-5 1827, the conclusion (𝑦 = 𝑧 → ∀𝑥𝑦 = 𝑧) follows. Note that ax-5 1827 cannot prove this because its distinct variable ($d) requirement is not satisfied directly but only indirectly (outside of Metamath) by the argument above. The original version of this axiom was ax-c9 33193 and was replaced with this shorter ax-13 2234 in December 2015. The old axiom is proved from this one as theorem axc9 2290. The primary purpose of this axiom is to provide a way to introduce the quantifier ∀𝑥 on 𝑦 = 𝑧 even when 𝑥 and 𝑦 are substituted with the same variable. In this case, the first antecedent becomes ¬ 𝑥 = 𝑥 and the axiom still holds. Although this version is shorter, the original version axc9 2290 may be more practical to work with because of the "distinctor" form of its antecedents. A typical application of axc9 2290 is in dvelimh 2324 which converts a distinct variable pair to the distinctor antecedent ¬ ∀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑦. In particular, it is conjectured that it is not possible to prove ax6 2239 from ax6v 1876 without this axiom. This axiom can be weakened if desired by adding distinct variable restrictions on pairs 𝑥, 𝑧 and 𝑦, 𝑧. To show that, we add these restrictions to theorem ax13v 2235 and use only ax13v 2235 for further derivations. Thus, ax13v 2235 should be the only theorem referencing this axiom. Other theorems can reference either ax13v 2235 (preferred) or ax13 2237 (if the stronger form is needed). This axiom scheme is logically redundant (see ax13w 2000) but is used as an auxiliary axiom scheme to achieve scheme completeness (i.e. so that all possible cases of bundling can be proved; see text linked at mmtheorems.html#ax6dgen). It is not known whether this axiom can be derived from the others. (Contributed by NM, 21-Dec-2015.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (¬ 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑦 = 𝑧 → ∀𝑥 𝑦 = 𝑧))
Theorem	ax13v 2235*	A weaker version of ax-13 2234 with distinct variable restrictions on pairs 𝑥, 𝑧 and 𝑦, 𝑧. In order to show (with ax13 2237) that this weakening is still adequate, this should be the only theorem referencing ax-13 2234 directly. Had we additonally required 𝑥 and 𝑦 be distinct, too, this theorem would have been a direct consequence of ax-5 1827. So essentially this theorem states, that a distinct variable condition can be replaced with an inequality between set variables. (Contributed by NM, 30-Jun-2016.)
⊢ (¬ 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑦 = 𝑧 → ∀𝑥 𝑦 = 𝑧))
Theorem	ax13lem1 2236*	A version of ax13v 2235 with one distinct variable restriction dropped. For convenience, 𝑦 is kept on the right side of equations. The proof of ax13 2237 bases on ideas from NM, 24-Dec-2015. (Contributed by Wolf Lammen, 8-Sep-2018.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (¬ 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑧 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑥 𝑧 = 𝑦))
Theorem	ax13 2237	Derive ax-13 2234 from ax13v 2235 and Tarski's FOL. This shows that the weakening in ax13v 2235 is still sufficient for a complete system. (Contributed by NM, 21-Dec-2015.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 31-Jan-2018.) Reduce axiom usage (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 2-Jun-2021.)
⊢ (¬ 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑦 = 𝑧 → ∀𝑥 𝑦 = 𝑧))
Theorem	ax6e 2238	At least one individual exists. This is not a theorem of free logic, which is sound in empty domains. For such a logic, we would add this theorem as an axiom of set theory (Axiom 0 of [Kunen] p. 10). In the system consisting of ax-4 1728 through ax-9 1986, all axioms other than ax-6 1875 are believed to be theorems of free logic, although the system without ax-6 1875 is not complete in free logic. It is preferred to use ax6ev 1877 when it is sufficient. (Contributed by NM, 14-May-1993.) Shortened after ax13lem1 2236 became available. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 8-Sep-2018.)
⊢ ∃𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦
Theorem	ax6 2239	Theorem showing that ax-6 1875 follows from the weaker version ax6v 1876. (Even though this theorem depends on ax-6 1875, all references of ax-6 1875 are made via ax6v 1876. An earlier version stated ax6v 1876 as a separate axiom, but having two axioms caused some confusion.) This theorem should be referenced in place of ax-6 1875 so that all proofs can be traced back to ax6v 1876. When possible, use the weaker ax6v 1876 rather than ax6 2239 since the ax6v 1876 derivation is much shorter and requires fewer axioms. (Contributed by NM, 12-Nov-2013.) (Revised by NM, 25-Jul-2015.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 4-Feb-2018.)
⊢ ¬ ∀𝑥 ¬ 𝑥 = 𝑦
Theorem	axc10 2240	Show that the original axiom ax-c10 33189 can be derived from ax6 2239 and others. See ax6fromc10 33199 for the rederivation of ax6 2239 from ax-c10 33189. Normally, axc10 2240 should be used rather than ax-c10 33189, except by theorems specifically studying the latter's properties. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑥𝜑) → 𝜑)
Theorem	spimt 2241	Closed theorem form of spim 2242. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jan-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 17-Oct-2016.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 24-Feb-2018.)
⊢ ((Ⅎ𝑥𝜓 ∧ ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 → 𝜓))) → (∀𝑥𝜑 → 𝜓))
Theorem	spim 2242	Specialization, using implicit substitution. Compare Lemma 14 of [Tarski] p. 70. The spim 2242 series of theorems requires that only one direction of the substitution hypothesis hold. (Contributed by NM, 10-Jan-1993.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 3-Oct-2016.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 18-Feb-2018.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 → 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥𝜑 → 𝜓)
Theorem	spimed 2243	Deduction version of spime 2244. (Contributed by NM, 14-May-1993.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 3-Oct-2016.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 19-Feb-2018.)
⊢ (𝜒 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜑)    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 → 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜒 → (𝜑 → ∃𝑥𝜓))
Theorem	spime 2244	Existential introduction, using implicit substitution. Compare Lemma 14 of [Tarski] p. 70. (Contributed by NM, 7-Aug-1994.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 3-Oct-2016.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 6-Mar-2018.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 → 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥𝜓)
Theorem	spimv 2245*	A version of spim 2242 with a distinct variable requirement instead of a bound variable hypothesis. See also spimv1 2101 and spimvw 1914. See also spimvALT 2246. (Contributed by NM, 31-Jul-1993.) Removed dependency on ax-10 2006. (Revised by BJ, 29-Nov-2020.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 → 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥𝜑 → 𝜓)
Theorem	spimvALT 2246*	Alternate proof of spimv 2245. Shorter but requires more axioms. (Contributed by NM, 31-Jul-1993.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 → 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥𝜑 → 𝜓)
Theorem	spimev 2247*	Distinct-variable version of spime 2244. (Contributed by NM, 10-Jan-1993.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 → 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥𝜓)
Theorem	spv 2248*	Specialization, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 30-Aug-1993.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥𝜑 → 𝜓)
Theorem	spei 2249	Inference from existential specialization, using implicit substitution. Remove a distinct variable constraint. (Contributed by NM, 19-Aug-1993.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 12-May-2018.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ 𝜓    ⇒   ⊢ ∃𝑥𝜑
Theorem	chvar 2250	Implicit substitution of 𝑦 for 𝑥 into a theorem. (Contributed by Raph Levien, 9-Jul-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 3-Oct-2016.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ 𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ 𝜓
Theorem	chvarv 2251*	Implicit substitution of 𝑦 for 𝑥 into a theorem. (Contributed by NM, 20-Apr-1994.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 22-Apr-2018.) Remove dependency on ax-10 2006. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 14-Jul-2021.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ 𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ 𝜓
Theorem	chvarvOLD 2252*	Obsolete proof of chvarv 2251 as of 14-Jul-2021. (Contributed by NM, 20-Apr-1994.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 22-Apr-2018.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ 𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ 𝜓
Theorem	cbv3 2253	Rule used to change bound variables, using implicit substitution, that does not use ax-c9 33193. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 12-May-2018.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 → 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥𝜑 → ∀𝑦𝜓)
Theorem	cbv3h 2254	Rule used to change bound variables, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 8-Jun-1993.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 25-May-2011.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 12-May-2018.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑦𝜑)    &   ⊢ (𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 → 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥𝜑 → ∀𝑦𝜓)
Theorem	cbv1 2255	Rule used to change bound variables, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 3-Oct-2016.) Format hypotheses to common style. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 13-May-2018.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑦𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜒)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑥𝜓 → ∀𝑦𝜒))
Theorem	cbv1h 2256	Rule used to change bound variables, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 11-May-1993.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 13-May-2018.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → ∀𝑦𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 → ∀𝑥𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)))    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦𝜑 → (∀𝑥𝜓 → ∀𝑦𝜒))
Theorem	cbv2h 2257	Rule used to change bound variables, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 11-May-1993.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → ∀𝑦𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 → ∀𝑥𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)))    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦𝜑 → (∀𝑥𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑦𝜒))
Theorem	cbv2 2258	Rule used to change bound variables, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 3-Oct-2016.) Format hypotheses to common style. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 13-May-2018.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑦𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜒)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑥𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑦𝜒))
Theorem	cbval 2259	Rule used to change bound variables, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 13-May-1993.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 3-Oct-2016.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑦𝜓)
Theorem	cbvex 2260	Rule used to change bound variables, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-1993.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦𝜓)
Theorem	cbvalv 2261*	Rule used to change bound variables, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) Remove dependency on ax-10 2006. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 17-Jul-2021.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑦𝜓)
Theorem	cbvalvOLD 2262*	Obsolete proof of cbvalv 2261 as of 17-Jul-2021. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑦𝜓)
Theorem	cbvexv 2263*	Rule used to change bound variables, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-1993.) Remove dependency on ax-10 2006. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 17-Jul-2021.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦𝜓)
Theorem	cbvexvOLD 2264*	Obsolete proof of cbvexv 2263 as of 17-Jul-2021. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-1993.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦𝜓)
Theorem	cbvald 2265*	Deduction used to change bound variables, using implicit substitution, particularly useful in conjunction with dvelim 2325. (Contributed by NM, 2-Jan-2002.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 6-Oct-2016.) (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 13-May-2018.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑦𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑥𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑦𝜒))
Theorem	cbvexd 2266*	Deduction used to change bound variables, using implicit substitution, particularly useful in conjunction with dvelim 2325. (Contributed by NM, 2-Jan-2002.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 6-Oct-2016.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑦𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑦𝜒))
Theorem	cbval2 2267*	Rule used to change bound variables, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 22-Dec-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 6-Oct-2016.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 22-Apr-2018.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑧𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑤𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜓    &   ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑤) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑧∀𝑤𝜓)
Theorem	cbvex2 2268*	Rule used to change bound variables, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 14-Sep-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 6-Oct-2016.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 16-Jun-2019.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑧𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑤𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜓    &   ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑤) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑧∃𝑤𝜓)
Theorem	cbvaldva 2269*	Rule used to change the bound variable in a universal quantifier with implicit substitution. Deduction form. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.) Remove dependency on ax-10 2006. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 18-Jul-2021.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑥𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑦𝜒))
Theorem	cbvaldvaOLD 2270*	Obsolete proof of cbvaldva 2269 as of 18-Jul-2021. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑥𝜓 ↔ ∀𝑦𝜒))
Theorem	cbvexdva 2271*	Rule used to change the bound variable in an existential quantifier with implicit substitution. Deduction form. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.) Remove dependency on ax-10 2006. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 18-Jul-2021.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑦𝜒))
Theorem	cbvexdvaOLD 2272*	Obsolete proof of cbvexdva 2271 as of 18-Jul-2021. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑦𝜒))
Theorem	cbval2v 2273*	Rule used to change bound variables, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 4-Feb-2005.) Remove dependency on ax-10 2006. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 18-Jul-2021.)
⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑤) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑧∀𝑤𝜓)
Theorem	cbval2vOLD 2274*	Obsolete proof of cbval2v 2273 as of 18-Jul-2021. (Contributed by NM, 4-Feb-2005.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑤) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑧∀𝑤𝜓)
Theorem	cbvex2v 2275*	Rule used to change bound variables, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 26-Jul-1995.) Remove dependency on ax-10 2006. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 18-Jul-2021.)
⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑤) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑧∃𝑤𝜓)
Theorem	cbvex2vOLD 2276*	Obsolete proof of cbvex2v 2275 as of 18-Jul-2021. (Contributed by NM, 26-Jul-1995.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑤) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑧∃𝑤𝜓)
Theorem	cbvex4v 2277*	Rule used to change bound variables, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 26-Jul-1995.)
⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝑣 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝑢) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ ((𝑧 = 𝑓 ∧ 𝑤 = 𝑔) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧∃𝑤𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑣∃𝑢∃𝑓∃𝑔𝜒)
Theorem	equs4 2278	Lemma used in proofs of implicit substitution properties. The converse requires either a dv condition (sb56 2136) or a non-freeness hypothesis (equs45f 2338). See equs4v 1917 for a version requiring fewer axioms. (Contributed by NM, 10-May-1993.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 20-May-2014.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 5-Feb-2018.)
⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑) → ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑))
Theorem	equsal 2279	An equivalence related to implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 2-Jun-1993.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 12-Aug-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 3-Oct-2016.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 5-Feb-2018.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑) ↔ 𝜓)
Theorem	equsalh 2280	An equivalence related to implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 2-Jun-1993.)
⊢ (𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑) ↔ 𝜓)
Theorem	equsex 2281	An equivalence related to implicit substitution. See equsexv 2095 for a version with a dv condition which does not require ax-13 2234. See equsexALT 2282 for an alternate proof. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 3-Oct-2016.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 6-Feb-2018.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ 𝜓)
Theorem	equsexALT 2282	Alternate proof of equsex 2281. This proves the result directly, instead of as a corollary of equsal 2279 via equs4 2278. Note in particular that only existential quantifiers appear in the proof and that the only step requiring ax-13 2234 is ax6e 2238. This proof mimics that of equsal 2279 (in particular, note pm5.32i 667, exbii 1764, 19.41 2090, mpbiran 955 correspond respectively to pm5.74i 259, albii 1737, 19.23 2067, a1bi 351). (Contributed by BJ, 20-Aug-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ 𝜓)
Theorem	equsexh 2283	An equivalence related to implicit substitution. See equsexhv 2135 for a version with a dv condition which does not require ax-13 2234. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
⊢ (𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ 𝜓)
Theorem	ax13lem2 2284*	Lemma for nfeqf2 2285. This lemma is equivalent to ax13v 2235 with one distinct variable constraint removed. (Contributed by Wolf Lammen, 8-Sep-2018.) Reduce axiom usage. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 18-Oct-2020.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (¬ 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (∃𝑥 𝑧 = 𝑦 → 𝑧 = 𝑦))
Theorem	nfeqf2 2285*	An equation between setvar is free of any other setvar. (Contributed by Wolf Lammen, 9-Jun-2019.)
⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → Ⅎ𝑥 𝑧 = 𝑦)
Theorem	dveeq2 2286*	Quantifier introduction when one pair of variables is distinct. (Contributed by NM, 2-Jan-2002.) (Revised by NM, 20-Jul-2015.) Remove dependency on ax-11 2021. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 8-Sep-2018.)
⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑧 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑥 𝑧 = 𝑦))
Theorem	nfeqf1 2287*	An equation between setvar is free of any other setvar. (Contributed by Wolf Lammen, 10-Jun-2019.)
⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → Ⅎ𝑥 𝑦 = 𝑧)
Theorem	dveeq1 2288*	Quantifier introduction when one pair of variables is distinct. (Contributed by NM, 2-Jan-2002.) Remove dependency on ax-11 2021. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 8-Sep-2018.)
⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑦 = 𝑧 → ∀𝑥 𝑦 = 𝑧))
Theorem	nfeqf 2289	A variable is effectively not free in an equality if it is not either of the involved variables. Ⅎ version of ax-c9 33193. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Oct-2016.) Remove dependency on ax-11 2021. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 6-Sep-2018.)
⊢ ((¬ ∀𝑧 𝑧 = 𝑥 ∧ ¬ ∀𝑧 𝑧 = 𝑦) → Ⅎ𝑧 𝑥 = 𝑦)
Theorem	axc9 2290	Derive set.mm's original ax-c9 33193 from the shorter ax-13 2234. (Contributed by NM, 29-Nov-2015.) (Revised by NM, 24-Dec-2015.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 29-Apr-2018.)
⊢ (¬ ∀𝑧 𝑧 = 𝑥 → (¬ ∀𝑧 𝑧 = 𝑦 → (𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑧 𝑥 = 𝑦)))
Theorem	axc15 2291	Derivation of set.mm's original ax-c15 33192 from ax-c11n 33191 and the shorter ax-12 2034 that has replaced it. Theorem ax12 2292 shows the reverse derivation of ax-12 2034 from ax-c15 33192. Normally, axc15 2291 should be used rather than ax-c15 33192, except by theorems specifically studying the latter's properties. (Contributed by NM, 2-Feb-2007.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 21-Apr-2018.)
⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑))))
Theorem	ax12 2292	Rederivation of axiom ax-12 2034 from ax12v 2035, axc11r 2175, and other axioms. (Contributed by NM, 22-Jan-2007.) Proof uses contemporary axioms. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 8-Aug-2020.) (Proof shortened by BJ, 4-Jul-2021.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (∀𝑦𝜑 → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑)))
Theorem	ax13OLD 2293	Obsolete proof of ax13 2237 as of 2-Jun-2021. (Contributed by NM, 21-Dec-2015.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 31-Jan-2018.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (¬ 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑦 = 𝑧 → ∀𝑥 𝑦 = 𝑧))
Theorem	axc11nlemALT 2294*	Alternate version of axc11nlemOLD2 1975 used in an older proof. (Contributed by NM, 8-Jul-2016.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 17-Feb-2018.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑤 → ∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑥)
Theorem	axc11n 2295	Derive set.mm's original ax-c11n 33191 from others. Commutation law for identical variable specifiers. The antecedent and consequent are true when 𝑥 and 𝑦 are substituted with the same variable. Lemma L12 in [Megill] p. 445 (p. 12 of the preprint). If a disjoint variable condition is added on 𝑥 and 𝑦, then this becomes an instance of aevlem 1968. Use aecom 2299 instead when this does not lengthen the proof. (Contributed by NM, 10-May-1993.) (Revised by NM, 7-Nov-2015.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 6-Mar-2018.) (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 30-Nov-2019.) (Proof shortened by BJ, 29-Mar-2021.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 2-Jul-2021.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑥)
Theorem	axc11nOLD 2296	Obsolete proof of axc11n 2295 as of 2-Jul-2021. (Contributed by NM, 10-May-1993.) (Revised by NM, 7-Nov-2015.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 6-Mar-2018.) (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 30-Nov-2019.) (Proof shortened by BJ, 29-Mar-2021.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑥)
Theorem	axc11nOLDOLD 2297	Old proof of axc11n 2295. Obsolete as of 29-Mar-2021. (Contributed by NM, 10-May-1993.) (Revised by NM, 7-Nov-2015.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 6-Mar-2018.) Adapt to a modification of axc11nlemOLD2 1975. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 30-Nov-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑥)
Theorem	axc11nALT 2298	Alternate proof of axc11n 2295 from axc11nlemALT 2294. (Contributed by NM, 10-May-1993.) (Revised by NM, 7-Nov-2015.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 6-Mar-2018.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → ∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑥)
Theorem	aecom 2299	Commutation law for identical variable specifiers. Both sides of the biconditional are true when 𝑥 and 𝑦 are substituted with the same variable. (Contributed by NM, 10-May-1993.) Changed to a biconditional. (Revised by BJ, 26-Sep-2019.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 ↔ ∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑥)
Theorem	aecoms 2300	A commutation rule for identical variable specifiers. (Contributed by NM, 10-May-1993.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝜑)    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑥 → 𝜑)