Home | Metamath
Proof Explorer Theorem List (p. 69 of 424) | < Previous Next > |
Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
Color key: | Metamath Proof Explorer
(1-27159) |
Hilbert Space Explorer
(27160-28684) |
Users' Mathboxes
(28685-42360) |
Type | Label | Description |
---|---|---|
Statement | ||
Theorem | nfofr 6801* | Hypothesis builder for function relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Jul-2014.) |
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝑅 ⇒ ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 ∘𝑟 𝑅 | ||
Theorem | offval 6802* | Value of an operation applied to two functions. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Jul-2014.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 Fn 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 Fn 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = 𝑆 & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐹‘𝑥) = 𝐶) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝐺‘𝑥) = 𝐷) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∘𝑓 𝑅𝐺) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ↦ (𝐶𝑅𝐷))) | ||
Theorem | ofrfval 6803* | Value of a relation applied to two functions. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Jul-2014.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 Fn 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 Fn 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = 𝑆 & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐹‘𝑥) = 𝐶) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝐺‘𝑥) = 𝐷) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∘𝑟 𝑅𝐺 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 𝐶𝑅𝐷)) | ||
Theorem | ofval 6804 | Evaluate a function operation at a point. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Jul-2014.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 Fn 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 Fn 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = 𝑆 & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐹‘𝑋) = 𝐶) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝐺‘𝑋) = 𝐷) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑆) → ((𝐹 ∘𝑓 𝑅𝐺)‘𝑋) = (𝐶𝑅𝐷)) | ||
Theorem | ofrval 6805 | Exhibit a function relation at a point. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Jul-2014.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 Fn 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 Fn 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = 𝑆 & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐹‘𝑋) = 𝐶) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝐺‘𝑋) = 𝐷) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐹 ∘𝑟 𝑅𝐺 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑆) → 𝐶𝑅𝐷) | ||
Theorem | offn 6806 | The function operation produces a function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Jul-2014.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 Fn 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 Fn 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = 𝑆 ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∘𝑓 𝑅𝐺) Fn 𝑆) | ||
Theorem | offval2f 6807* | The function operation expressed as a mapping. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 23-Jun-2017.) |
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∘𝑓 𝑅𝐺) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ (𝐵𝑅𝐶))) | ||
Theorem | ofmresval 6808 | Value of a restriction of the function operation map. (Contributed by NM, 20-Oct-2014.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹( ∘𝑓 𝑅 ↾ (𝐴 × 𝐵))𝐺) = (𝐹 ∘𝑓 𝑅𝐺)) | ||
Theorem | fnfvof 6809 | Function value of a pointwise composition. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 5-Oct-2014.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 5-Jun-2015.) |
⊢ (((𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ 𝐺 Fn 𝐴) ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴)) → ((𝐹 ∘𝑓 𝑅𝐺)‘𝑋) = ((𝐹‘𝑋)𝑅(𝐺‘𝑋))) | ||
Theorem | off 6810* | The function operation produces a function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Jul-2014.) |
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑇)) → (𝑥𝑅𝑦) ∈ 𝑈) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝐵⟶𝑇) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = 𝐶 ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∘𝑓 𝑅𝐺):𝐶⟶𝑈) | ||
Theorem | ofres 6811 | Restrict the operands of a function operation to the same domain as that of the operation itself. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Sep-2014.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 Fn 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 Fn 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = 𝐶 ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∘𝑓 𝑅𝐺) = ((𝐹 ↾ 𝐶) ∘𝑓 𝑅(𝐺 ↾ 𝐶))) | ||
Theorem | offval2 6812* | The function operation expressed as a mapping. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Jul-2014.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∘𝑓 𝑅𝐺) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ (𝐵𝑅𝐶))) | ||
Theorem | ofrfval2 6813* | The function relation acting on maps. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Jul-2014.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∘𝑟 𝑅𝐺 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵𝑅𝐶)) | ||
Theorem | ofmpteq 6814* | Value of a pointwise operation on two functions defined using maps-to notation. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 5-Oct-2014.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) Fn 𝐴 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶) Fn 𝐴) → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ∘𝑓 𝑅(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶)) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ (𝐵𝑅𝐶))) | ||
Theorem | ofco 6815 | The composition of a function operation with another function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Dec-2014.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 Fn 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 Fn 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻:𝐷⟶𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑋) & ⊢ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = 𝐶 ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐹 ∘𝑓 𝑅𝐺) ∘ 𝐻) = ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐻) ∘𝑓 𝑅(𝐺 ∘ 𝐻))) | ||
Theorem | offveq 6816* | Convert an identity of the operation to the analogous identity on the function operation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jul-2014.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 Fn 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 Fn 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 Fn 𝐴) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐹‘𝑥) = 𝐵) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐺‘𝑥) = 𝐶) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐵𝑅𝐶) = (𝐻‘𝑥)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∘𝑓 𝑅𝐺) = 𝐻) | ||
Theorem | offveqb 6817* | Equivalent expressions for equality with a function operation. (Contributed by NM, 9-Oct-2014.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 5-Dec-2016.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 Fn 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 Fn 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 Fn 𝐴) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐹‘𝑥) = 𝐵) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐺‘𝑥) = 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐻 = (𝐹 ∘𝑓 𝑅𝐺) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐻‘𝑥) = (𝐵𝑅𝐶))) | ||
Theorem | ofc1 6818 | Left operation by a constant. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jul-2014.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 Fn 𝐴) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐹‘𝑋) = 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) → (((𝐴 × {𝐵}) ∘𝑓 𝑅𝐹)‘𝑋) = (𝐵𝑅𝐶)) | ||
Theorem | ofc2 6819 | Right operation by a constant. (Contributed by NM, 7-Oct-2014.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 Fn 𝐴) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐹‘𝑋) = 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) → ((𝐹 ∘𝑓 𝑅(𝐴 × {𝐵}))‘𝑋) = (𝐶𝑅𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | ofc12 6820 | Function operation on two constant functions. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Jul-2014.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 × {𝐵}) ∘𝑓 𝑅(𝐴 × {𝐶})) = (𝐴 × {(𝐵𝑅𝐶)})) | ||
Theorem | caofref 6821* | Transfer a reflexive law to the function relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Jul-2014.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝑆) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑆) → 𝑥𝑅𝑥) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∘𝑟 𝑅𝐹) | ||
Theorem | caofinvl 6822* | Transfer a left inverse law to the function operation. (Contributed by NM, 22-Oct-2014.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁:𝑆⟶𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 = (𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ (𝑁‘(𝐹‘𝑣)))) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑆) → ((𝑁‘𝑥)𝑅𝑥) = 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺 ∘𝑓 𝑅𝐹) = (𝐴 × {𝐵})) | ||
Theorem | caofid0l 6823* | Transfer a left identity law to the function operation. (Contributed by NM, 21-Oct-2014.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑆) → (𝐵𝑅𝑥) = 𝑥) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 × {𝐵}) ∘𝑓 𝑅𝐹) = 𝐹) | ||
Theorem | caofid0r 6824* | Transfer a right identity law to the function operation. (Contributed by NM, 21-Oct-2014.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑆) → (𝑥𝑅𝐵) = 𝑥) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∘𝑓 𝑅(𝐴 × {𝐵})) = 𝐹) | ||
Theorem | caofid1 6825* | Transfer a right absorption law to the function operation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Jul-2014.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑆) → (𝑥𝑅𝐵) = 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∘𝑓 𝑅(𝐴 × {𝐵})) = (𝐴 × {𝐶})) | ||
Theorem | caofid2 6826* | Transfer a right absorption law to the function operation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Jul-2014.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑆) → (𝐵𝑅𝑥) = 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 × {𝐵}) ∘𝑓 𝑅𝐹) = (𝐴 × {𝐶})) | ||
Theorem | caofcom 6827* | Transfer a commutative law to the function operation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-Jul-2014.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝐴⟶𝑆) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝑥𝑅𝑦) = (𝑦𝑅𝑥)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∘𝑓 𝑅𝐺) = (𝐺 ∘𝑓 𝑅𝐹)) | ||
Theorem | caofrss 6828* | Transfer a relation subset law to the function relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Jul-2014.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝐴⟶𝑆) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝑥𝑅𝑦 → 𝑥𝑇𝑦)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∘𝑟 𝑅𝐺 → 𝐹 ∘𝑟 𝑇𝐺)) | ||
Theorem | caofass 6829* | Transfer an associative law to the function operation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-Jul-2014.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝐴⟶𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻:𝐴⟶𝑆) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑆)) → ((𝑥𝑅𝑦)𝑇𝑧) = (𝑥𝑂(𝑦𝑃𝑧))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐹 ∘𝑓 𝑅𝐺) ∘𝑓 𝑇𝐻) = (𝐹 ∘𝑓 𝑂(𝐺 ∘𝑓 𝑃𝐻))) | ||
Theorem | caoftrn 6830* | Transfer a transitivity law to the function relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Jul-2014.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝐴⟶𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻:𝐴⟶𝑆) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑆)) → ((𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝑦𝑇𝑧) → 𝑥𝑈𝑧)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐹 ∘𝑟 𝑅𝐺 ∧ 𝐺 ∘𝑟 𝑇𝐻) → 𝐹 ∘𝑟 𝑈𝐻)) | ||
Theorem | caofdi 6831* | Transfer a distributive law to the function operation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-Jul-2014.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐾) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝐴⟶𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻:𝐴⟶𝑆) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝑥𝑇(𝑦𝑅𝑧)) = ((𝑥𝑇𝑦)𝑂(𝑥𝑇𝑧))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∘𝑓 𝑇(𝐺 ∘𝑓 𝑅𝐻)) = ((𝐹 ∘𝑓 𝑇𝐺) ∘𝑓 𝑂(𝐹 ∘𝑓 𝑇𝐻))) | ||
Theorem | caofdir 6832* | Transfer a reverse distributive law to the function operation. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-2014.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐾) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝐴⟶𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻:𝐴⟶𝑆) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐾)) → ((𝑥𝑅𝑦)𝑇𝑧) = ((𝑥𝑇𝑧)𝑂(𝑦𝑇𝑧))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐺 ∘𝑓 𝑅𝐻) ∘𝑓 𝑇𝐹) = ((𝐺 ∘𝑓 𝑇𝐹) ∘𝑓 𝑂(𝐻 ∘𝑓 𝑇𝐹))) | ||
Theorem | caonncan 6833* | Transfer nncan 10189-shaped laws to vectors of numbers. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 27-Mar-2015.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴:𝐼⟶𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵:𝐼⟶𝑆) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝑥𝑀(𝑥𝑀𝑦)) = 𝑦) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∘𝑓 𝑀(𝐴 ∘𝑓 𝑀𝐵)) = 𝐵) | ||
Syntax | crpss 6834 | Extend class notation to include the reified proper subset relation. |
class [⊊] | ||
Definition | df-rpss 6835* | Define a relation which corresponds to proper subsethood df-pss 3556 on sets. This allows us to use proper subsethood with general concepts that require relations, such as strict ordering, see sorpss 6840. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Nov-2014.) |
⊢ [⊊] = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝑥 ⊊ 𝑦} | ||
Theorem | relrpss 6836 | The proper subset relation is a relation. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Nov-2014.) |
⊢ Rel [⊊] | ||
Theorem | brrpssg 6837 | The proper subset relation on sets is the same as class proper subsethood. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Nov-2014.) |
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 [⊊] 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 ⊊ 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | brrpss 6838 | The proper subset relation on sets is the same as class proper subsethood. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Nov-2014.) |
⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 [⊊] 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 ⊊ 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | porpss 6839 | Every class is partially ordered by proper subsets. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Nov-2014.) |
⊢ [⊊] Po 𝐴 | ||
Theorem | sorpss 6840* | Express strict ordering under proper subsets, i.e. the notion of a chain of sets. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Nov-2014.) |
⊢ ( [⊊] Or 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ⊆ 𝑥)) | ||
Theorem | sorpssi 6841 | Property of a chain of sets. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Nov-2014.) |
⊢ (( [⊊] Or 𝐴 ∧ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴)) → (𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶 ∨ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | sorpssun 6842 | A chain of sets is closed under binary union. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-May-2015.) |
⊢ (( [⊊] Or 𝐴 ∧ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴)) → (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶) ∈ 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | sorpssin 6843 | A chain of sets is closed under binary intersection. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-May-2015.) |
⊢ (( [⊊] Or 𝐴 ∧ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴)) → (𝐵 ∩ 𝐶) ∈ 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | sorpssuni 6844* | In a chain of sets, a maximal element is the union of the chain. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Nov-2014.) |
⊢ ( [⊊] Or 𝑌 → (∃𝑢 ∈ 𝑌 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝑌 ¬ 𝑢 ⊊ 𝑣 ↔ ∪ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑌)) | ||
Theorem | sorpssint 6845* | In a chain of sets, a minimal element is the intersection of the chain. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Nov-2014.) |
⊢ ( [⊊] Or 𝑌 → (∃𝑢 ∈ 𝑌 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝑌 ¬ 𝑣 ⊊ 𝑢 ↔ ∩ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑌)) | ||
Theorem | sorpsscmpl 6846* | The componentwise complement of a chain of sets is also a chain of sets. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Nov-2014.) |
⊢ ( [⊊] Or 𝑌 → [⊊] Or {𝑢 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 ∣ (𝐴 ∖ 𝑢) ∈ 𝑌}) | ||
Axiom | ax-un 6847* |
Axiom of Union. An axiom of Zermelo-Fraenkel set theory. It states
that a set 𝑦 exists that includes the union of a
given set 𝑥
i.e. the collection of all members of the members of 𝑥. The
variant axun2 6849 states that the union itself exists. A
version with the
standard abbreviation for union is uniex2 6850. A version using class
notation is uniex 6851.
The union of a class df-uni 4373 should not be confused with the union of two classes df-un 3545. Their relationship is shown in unipr 4385. (Contributed by NM, 23-Dec-1993.) |
⊢ ∃𝑦∀𝑧(∃𝑤(𝑧 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑥) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦) | ||
Theorem | zfun 6848* | Axiom of Union expressed with the fewest number of different variables. (Contributed by NM, 14-Aug-2003.) |
⊢ ∃𝑥∀𝑦(∃𝑥(𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑧) → 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) | ||
Theorem | axun2 6849* | A variant of the Axiom of Union ax-un 6847. For any set 𝑥, there exists a set 𝑦 whose members are exactly the members of the members of 𝑥 i.e. the union of 𝑥. Axiom Union of [BellMachover] p. 466. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jun-2006.) |
⊢ ∃𝑦∀𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ ∃𝑤(𝑧 ∈ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑥)) | ||
Theorem | uniex2 6850* | The Axiom of Union using the standard abbreviation for union. Given any set 𝑥, its union 𝑦 exists. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jun-2006.) |
⊢ ∃𝑦 𝑦 = ∪ 𝑥 | ||
Theorem | uniex 6851 | The Axiom of Union in class notation. This says that if 𝐴 is a set i.e. 𝐴 ∈ V (see isset 3180), then the union of 𝐴 is also a set. Same as Axiom 3 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 16. (Contributed by NM, 11-Aug-1993.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ ∪ 𝐴 ∈ V | ||
Theorem | vuniex 6852 | The union of a setvar is a set. (Contributed by BJ, 3-May-2021.) |
⊢ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ V | ||
Theorem | uniexg 6853 | The ZF Axiom of Union in class notation, in the form of a theorem instead of an inference. We use the antecedent 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 instead of 𝐴 ∈ V to make the theorem more general and thus shorten some proofs; obviously the universal class constant V is one possible substitution for class variable 𝑉. (Contributed by NM, 25-Nov-1994.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ∪ 𝐴 ∈ V) | ||
Theorem | unex 6854 | The union of two sets is a set. Corollary 5.8 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 16. (Contributed by NM, 1-Jul-1994.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∈ V | ||
Theorem | tpex 6855 | An unordered triple of classes exists. (Contributed by NM, 10-Apr-1994.) |
⊢ {𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶} ∈ V | ||
Theorem | unexb 6856 | Existence of union is equivalent to existence of its components. (Contributed by NM, 11-Jun-1998.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V) ↔ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∈ V) | ||
Theorem | unexg 6857 | A union of two sets is a set. Corollary 5.8 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 16. (Contributed by NM, 18-Sep-2006.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∈ V) | ||
Theorem | xpexg 6858 | The Cartesian product of two sets is a set. Proposition 6.2 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 23. See also xpexgALT 7052. (Contributed by NM, 14-Aug-1994.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴 × 𝐵) ∈ V) | ||
Theorem | 3xpexg 6859 | The Cartesian product of three sets is a set. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 21-Feb-2018.) |
⊢ (𝑉 ∈ 𝑊 → ((𝑉 × 𝑉) × 𝑉) ∈ V) | ||
Theorem | xpex 6860 | The Cartesian product of two sets is a set. Proposition 6.2 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 23. (Contributed by NM, 14-Aug-1994.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 × 𝐵) ∈ V | ||
Theorem | sqxpexg 6861 | The Cartesian square of a set is a set. (Contributed by AV, 13-Jan-2020.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 × 𝐴) ∈ V) | ||
Theorem | snnex 6862* | The class of all singletons is a proper class. (Contributed by NM, 10-Oct-2008.) (Proof shortened by Eric Schmidt, 7-Dec-2008.) |
⊢ {𝑥 ∣ ∃𝑦 𝑥 = {𝑦}} ∉ V | ||
Theorem | difex2 6863 | If the subtrahend of a class difference exists, then the minuend exists iff the difference exists. (Contributed by NM, 12-Nov-2003.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 12-Aug-2011.) |
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐶 → (𝐴 ∈ V ↔ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) ∈ V)) | ||
Theorem | difsnexi 6864 | If the difference of a class and a singleton is a set, the class itself is a set. (Contributed by AV, 15-Jan-2019.) |
⊢ ((𝑁 ∖ {𝐾}) ∈ V → 𝑁 ∈ V) | ||
Theorem | uniuni 6865* | Expression for double union that moves union into a class builder. (Contributed by FL, 28-May-2007.) |
⊢ ∪ ∪ 𝐴 = ∪ {𝑥 ∣ ∃𝑦(𝑥 = ∪ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)} | ||
Theorem | uniexb 6866 | The Axiom of Union and its converse. A class is a set iff its union is a set. (Contributed by NM, 11-Nov-2003.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ V ↔ ∪ 𝐴 ∈ V) | ||
Theorem | pwexb 6867 | The Axiom of Power Sets and its converse. A class is a set iff its power class is a set. (Contributed by NM, 11-Nov-2003.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ V ↔ 𝒫 𝐴 ∈ V) | ||
Theorem | eldifpw 6868 | Membership in a power class difference. (Contributed by NM, 25-Mar-2007.) |
⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐵) → (𝐴 ∪ 𝐶) ∈ (𝒫 (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶) ∖ 𝒫 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | elpwun 6869 | Membership in the power class of a union. (Contributed by NM, 26-Mar-2007.) |
⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝒫 (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶) ↔ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐶) ∈ 𝒫 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | iunpw 6870* | An indexed union of a power class in terms of the power class of the union of its index. Part of Exercise 24(b) of [Enderton] p. 33. (Contributed by NM, 29-Nov-2003.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 = ∪ 𝐴 ↔ 𝒫 ∪ 𝐴 = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝒫 𝑥) | ||
Theorem | fr3nr 6871 | A well-founded relation has no 3-cycle loops. Special case of Proposition 6.23 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 30. (Contributed by NM, 10-Apr-1994.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 22-Jun-2015.) |
⊢ ((𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ∧ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐴)) → ¬ (𝐵𝑅𝐶 ∧ 𝐶𝑅𝐷 ∧ 𝐷𝑅𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | epne3 6872 | A set well-founded by epsilon contains no 3-cycle loops. (Contributed by NM, 19-Apr-1994.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 22-Jun-2015.) |
⊢ (( E Fr 𝐴 ∧ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐴)) → ¬ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | dfwe2 6873* | Alternate definition of well-ordering. Definition 6.24(2) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 30. (Contributed by NM, 16-Mar-1997.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 12-Aug-2011.) |
⊢ (𝑅 We 𝐴 ↔ (𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦𝑅𝑥))) | ||
Theorem | ordon 6874 | The class of all ordinal numbers is ordinal. Proposition 7.12 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 38, but without using the Axiom of Regularity. (Contributed by NM, 17-May-1994.) |
⊢ Ord On | ||
Theorem | epweon 6875 | The epsilon relation well-orders the class of ordinal numbers. Proposition 4.8(g) of [Mendelson] p. 244. (Contributed by NM, 1-Nov-2003.) |
⊢ E We On | ||
Theorem | onprc 6876 | No set contains all ordinal numbers. Proposition 7.13 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 38, but without using the Axiom of Regularity. This is also known as the Burali-Forti paradox (remark in [Enderton] p. 194). In 1897, Cesare Burali-Forti noticed that since the "set" of all ordinal numbers is an ordinal class (ordon 6874), it must be both an element of the set of all ordinal numbers yet greater than every such element. ZF set theory resolves this paradox by not allowing the class of all ordinal numbers to be a set (so instead it is a proper class). Here we prove the denial of its existence. (Contributed by NM, 18-May-1994.) |
⊢ ¬ On ∈ V | ||
Theorem | ssorduni 6877 | The union of a class of ordinal numbers is ordinal. Proposition 7.19 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 40. (Contributed by NM, 30-May-1994.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 12-Aug-2011.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ On → Ord ∪ 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | ssonuni 6878 | The union of a set of ordinal numbers is an ordinal number. Theorem 9 of [Suppes] p. 132. (Contributed by NM, 1-Nov-2003.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 ⊆ On → ∪ 𝐴 ∈ On)) | ||
Theorem | ssonunii 6879 | The union of a set of ordinal numbers is an ordinal number. Corollary 7N(d) of [Enderton] p. 193. (Contributed by NM, 20-Sep-2003.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ On → ∪ 𝐴 ∈ On) | ||
Theorem | ordeleqon 6880 | A way to express the ordinal property of a class in terms of the class of ordinal numbers. Corollary 7.14 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 38 and its converse. (Contributed by NM, 1-Jun-2003.) |
⊢ (Ord 𝐴 ↔ (𝐴 ∈ On ∨ 𝐴 = On)) | ||
Theorem | ordsson 6881 | Any ordinal class is a subclass of the class of ordinal numbers. Corollary 7.15 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 38. (Contributed by NM, 18-May-1994.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 12-Aug-2011.) |
⊢ (Ord 𝐴 → 𝐴 ⊆ On) | ||
Theorem | onss 6882 | An ordinal number is a subset of the class of ordinal numbers. (Contributed by NM, 5-Jun-1994.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → 𝐴 ⊆ On) | ||
Theorem | predon 6883 | For an ordinal, the predecessor under E and On is an identity relationship. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 27-Mar-2011.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → Pred( E , On, 𝐴) = 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | ssonprc 6884 | Two ways of saying a class of ordinals is unbounded. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Jun-2013.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ On → (𝐴 ∉ V ↔ ∪ 𝐴 = On)) | ||
Theorem | onuni 6885 | The union of an ordinal number is an ordinal number. (Contributed by NM, 29-Sep-2006.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → ∪ 𝐴 ∈ On) | ||
Theorem | orduni 6886 | The union of an ordinal class is ordinal. (Contributed by NM, 12-Sep-2003.) |
⊢ (Ord 𝐴 → Ord ∪ 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | onint 6887 | The intersection (infimum) of a nonempty class of ordinal numbers belongs to the class. Compare Exercise 4 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 45. (Contributed by NM, 31-Jan-1997.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ On ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) → ∩ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | onint0 6888 | The intersection of a class of ordinal numbers is zero iff the class contains zero. (Contributed by NM, 24-Apr-2004.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ On → (∩ 𝐴 = ∅ ↔ ∅ ∈ 𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | onssmin 6889* | A nonempty class of ordinal numbers has the smallest member. Exercise 9 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 40. (Contributed by NM, 3-Oct-2003.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ On ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦) | ||
Theorem | onminesb 6890 | If a property is true for some ordinal number, it is true for a minimal ordinal number. This version uses explicit substitution. Theorem Schema 62 of [Suppes] p. 228. (Contributed by NM, 29-Sep-2003.) |
⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ On 𝜑 → [∩ {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ 𝜑} / 𝑥]𝜑) | ||
Theorem | onminsb 6891 | If a property is true for some ordinal number, it is true for a minimal ordinal number. This version uses implicit substitution. Theorem Schema 62 of [Suppes] p. 228. (Contributed by NM, 3-Oct-2003.) |
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓 & ⊢ (𝑥 = ∩ {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ 𝜑} → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ⇒ ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ On 𝜑 → 𝜓) | ||
Theorem | oninton 6892 | The intersection of a nonempty collection of ordinal numbers is an ordinal number. Compare Exercise 6 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 44. (Contributed by NM, 29-Jan-1997.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ On ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) → ∩ 𝐴 ∈ On) | ||
Theorem | onintrab 6893 | The intersection of a class of ordinal numbers exists iff it is an ordinal number. (Contributed by NM, 6-Nov-2003.) |
⊢ (∩ {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ 𝜑} ∈ V ↔ ∩ {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ 𝜑} ∈ On) | ||
Theorem | onintrab2 6894 | An existence condition equivalent to an intersection's being an ordinal number. (Contributed by NM, 6-Nov-2003.) |
⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ On 𝜑 ↔ ∩ {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ 𝜑} ∈ On) | ||
Theorem | onnmin 6895 | No member of a set of ordinal numbers belongs to its minimum. (Contributed by NM, 2-Feb-1997.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → ¬ 𝐵 ∈ ∩ 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | onnminsb 6896* | An ordinal number smaller than the minimum of a set of ordinal numbers does not have the property determining that set. 𝜓 is the wff resulting from the substitution of 𝐴 for 𝑥 in wff 𝜑. (Contributed by NM, 9-Nov-2003.) |
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → (𝐴 ∈ ∩ {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ 𝜑} → ¬ 𝜓)) | ||
Theorem | oneqmin 6897* | A way to show that an ordinal number equals the minimum of a nonempty collection of ordinal numbers: it must be in the collection, and it must not be larger than any member of the collection. (Contributed by NM, 14-Nov-2003.) |
⊢ ((𝐵 ⊆ On ∧ 𝐵 ≠ ∅) → (𝐴 = ∩ 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))) | ||
Theorem | bm2.5ii 6898* | Problem 2.5(ii) of [BellMachover] p. 471. (Contributed by NM, 20-Sep-2003.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ On → ∪ 𝐴 = ∩ {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ⊆ 𝑥}) | ||
Theorem | onminex 6899* | If a wff is true for an ordinal number, there is the smallest ordinal number for which it is true. (Contributed by NM, 2-Feb-1997.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 20-Nov-2016.) |
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ⇒ ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ On 𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ On (𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ¬ 𝜓)) | ||
Theorem | sucon 6900 | The class of all ordinal numbers is its own successor. (Contributed by NM, 12-Sep-2003.) |
⊢ suc On = On |
< Previous Next > |
Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |