Theorem difopab 4469

Description: The difference of two ordered-pair abstractions. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 17-Jan-2015.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
difopab	⊢ ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ∖ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜓}) = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓)}

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝑦

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦)   𝜓(𝑥,𝑦)

Proof of Theorem difopab

Dummy variables 𝑤 𝑧 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		relopab 4464	. . 3 ⊢ Rel {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑}
2		reldif 4457	. . 3 ⊢ (Rel {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} → Rel ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ∖ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜓}))
3	1, 2	ax-mp 7	. 2 ⊢ Rel ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ∖ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜓})
4		relopab 4464	. 2 ⊢ Rel {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓)}
5		sbcan 2805	. . . 4 ⊢ ([𝑧 / 𝑥]([𝑤 / 𝑦]𝜑 ∧ [𝑤 / 𝑦] ¬ 𝜓) ↔ ([𝑧 / 𝑥][𝑤 / 𝑦]𝜑 ∧ [𝑧 / 𝑥][𝑤 / 𝑦] ¬ 𝜓))
6		sbcan 2805	. . . . 5 ⊢ ([𝑤 / 𝑦](𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓) ↔ ([𝑤 / 𝑦]𝜑 ∧ [𝑤 / 𝑦] ¬ 𝜓))
7	6	sbcbii 2818	. . . 4 ⊢ ([𝑧 / 𝑥][𝑤 / 𝑦](𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓) ↔ [𝑧 / 𝑥]([𝑤 / 𝑦]𝜑 ∧ [𝑤 / 𝑦] ¬ 𝜓))
8		opelopabsb 3997	. . . . 5 ⊢ (⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩ ∈ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ↔ [𝑧 / 𝑥][𝑤 / 𝑦]𝜑)
9		vex 2560	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ 𝑧 ∈ V
10		sbcng 2803	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑧 ∈ V → ([𝑧 / 𝑥] ¬ [𝑤 / 𝑦]𝜓 ↔ ¬ [𝑧 / 𝑥][𝑤 / 𝑦]𝜓))
11	9, 10	ax-mp 7	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ([𝑧 / 𝑥] ¬ [𝑤 / 𝑦]𝜓 ↔ ¬ [𝑧 / 𝑥][𝑤 / 𝑦]𝜓)
12		vex 2560	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ 𝑤 ∈ V
13		sbcng 2803	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑤 ∈ V → ([𝑤 / 𝑦] ¬ 𝜓 ↔ ¬ [𝑤 / 𝑦]𝜓))
14	12, 13	ax-mp 7	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ([𝑤 / 𝑦] ¬ 𝜓 ↔ ¬ [𝑤 / 𝑦]𝜓)
15	14	sbcbii 2818	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ([𝑧 / 𝑥][𝑤 / 𝑦] ¬ 𝜓 ↔ [𝑧 / 𝑥] ¬ [𝑤 / 𝑦]𝜓)
16		opelopabsb 3997	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩ ∈ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜓} ↔ [𝑧 / 𝑥][𝑤 / 𝑦]𝜓)
17	16	notbii 594	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (¬ ⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩ ∈ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜓} ↔ ¬ [𝑧 / 𝑥][𝑤 / 𝑦]𝜓)
18	11, 15, 17	3bitr4ri 202	. . . . 5 ⊢ (¬ ⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩ ∈ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜓} ↔ [𝑧 / 𝑥][𝑤 / 𝑦] ¬ 𝜓)
19	8, 18	anbi12i 433	. . . 4 ⊢ ((⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩ ∈ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ∧ ¬ ⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩ ∈ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜓}) ↔ ([𝑧 / 𝑥][𝑤 / 𝑦]𝜑 ∧ [𝑧 / 𝑥][𝑤 / 𝑦] ¬ 𝜓))
20	5, 7, 19	3bitr4ri 202	. . 3 ⊢ ((⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩ ∈ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ∧ ¬ ⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩ ∈ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜓}) ↔ [𝑧 / 𝑥][𝑤 / 𝑦](𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓))
21		eldif 2927	. . 3 ⊢ (⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩ ∈ ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ∖ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜓}) ↔ (⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩ ∈ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ∧ ¬ ⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩ ∈ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜓}))
22		opelopabsb 3997	. . 3 ⊢ (⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩ ∈ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓)} ↔ [𝑧 / 𝑥][𝑤 / 𝑦](𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓))
23	20, 21, 22	3bitr4i 201	. 2 ⊢ (⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩ ∈ ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ∖ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜓}) ↔ ⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩ ∈ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓)})
24	3, 4, 23	eqrelriiv 4434	1 ⊢ ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ∖ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜓}) = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓)}

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   ∧ wa 97   ↔ wb 98   = wceq 1243   ∈ wcel 1393  Vcvv 2557  [wsbc 2764   ∖ cdif 2914  ⟨cop 3378  {copab 3817  Rel wrel 4350

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 99  ax-ia2 100  ax-ia3 101  ax-in1 544  ax-in2 545  ax-io 630  ax-5 1336  ax-7 1337  ax-gen 1338  ax-ie1 1382  ax-ie2 1383  ax-8 1395  ax-10 1396  ax-11 1397  ax-i12 1398  ax-bndl 1399  ax-4 1400  ax-14 1405  ax-17 1419  ax-i9 1423  ax-ial 1427  ax-i5r 1428  ax-ext 2022  ax-sep 3875  ax-pow 3927  ax-pr 3944

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 110  df-3an 887  df-tru 1246  df-fal 1249  df-nf 1350  df-sb 1646  df-eu 1903  df-mo 1904  df-clab 2027  df-cleq 2033  df-clel 2036  df-nfc 2167  df-ral 2311  df-rex 2312  df-v 2559  df-sbc 2765  df-dif 2920  df-un 2922  df-in 2924  df-ss 2931  df-pw 3361  df-sn 3381  df-pr 3382  df-op 3384  df-opab 3819  df-xp 4351  df-rel 4352

This theorem is referenced by: (None)