Theorem bj-inf2vn 10099

Description: A sufficient condition for ω to be a set. See bj-inf2vn2 10100 for the unbounded version from full set induction. (Contributed by BJ, 8-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
bj-inf2vn.1	⊢ BOUNDED 𝐴

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bj-inf2vn	⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 = suc 𝑦)) → 𝐴 = ω))

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝑦,𝐴

Allowed substitution hints:   𝑉(𝑥,𝑦)

Proof of Theorem bj-inf2vn

Dummy variable 𝑧 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		bj-inf2vnlem1 10095	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 = suc 𝑦)) → Ind 𝐴)
2		bi1 111	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 = suc 𝑦)) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 = suc 𝑦)))
3	2	alimi 1344	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 = suc 𝑦)) → ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 = suc 𝑦)))
4		df-ral 2311	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 = suc 𝑦) ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 = suc 𝑦)))
5	3, 4	sylibr 137	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 = suc 𝑦)) → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 = suc 𝑦))
6		bj-inf2vn.1	. . . . . 6 ⊢ BOUNDED 𝐴
7		bdcv 9968	. . . . . 6 ⊢ BOUNDED 𝑧
8	6, 7	bj-inf2vnlem3 10097	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 = suc 𝑦) → (Ind 𝑧 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑧))
9	5, 8	syl 14	. . . 4 ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 = suc 𝑦)) → (Ind 𝑧 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑧))
10	9	alrimiv 1754	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 = suc 𝑦)) → ∀𝑧(Ind 𝑧 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑧))
11	1, 10	jca 290	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 = suc 𝑦)) → (Ind 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑧(Ind 𝑧 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑧)))
12		bj-om 10061	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 = ω ↔ (Ind 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑧(Ind 𝑧 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑧))))
13	11, 12	syl5ibr 145	1 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 = suc 𝑦)) → 𝐴 = ω))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 97   ↔ wb 98   ∨ wo 629  ∀wal 1241   = wceq 1243   ∈ wcel 1393  ∀wral 2306  ∃wrex 2307   ⊆ wss 2917  ∅c0 3224  suc csuc 4102  ωcom 4313  BOUNDED wbdc 9960  Ind wind 10050

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 99  ax-ia2 100  ax-ia3 101  ax-in1 544  ax-in2 545  ax-io 630  ax-5 1336  ax-7 1337  ax-gen 1338  ax-ie1 1382  ax-ie2 1383  ax-8 1395  ax-10 1396  ax-11 1397  ax-i12 1398  ax-bndl 1399  ax-4 1400  ax-13 1404  ax-14 1405  ax-17 1419  ax-i9 1423  ax-ial 1427  ax-i5r 1428  ax-ext 2022  ax-nul 3883  ax-pr 3944  ax-un 4170  ax-bd0 9933  ax-bdim 9934  ax-bdor 9936  ax-bdex 9939  ax-bdeq 9940  ax-bdel 9941  ax-bdsb 9942  ax-bdsep 10004  ax-bdsetind 10093

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 110  df-tru 1246  df-nf 1350  df-sb 1646  df-clab 2027  df-cleq 2033  df-clel 2036  df-nfc 2167  df-ral 2311  df-rex 2312  df-rab 2315  df-v 2559  df-dif 2920  df-un 2922  df-in 2924  df-ss 2931  df-nul 3225  df-sn 3381  df-pr 3382  df-uni 3581  df-int 3616  df-suc 4108  df-iom 4314  df-bdc 9961  df-bj-ind 10051

This theorem is referenced by:  bj-omex2  10102  bj-nn0sucALT  10103