Theorem bj-omex2 10102

Description: Using bounded set induction and the strong axiom of infinity, ω is a set, that is, we recover ax-infvn 10066 (see bj-2inf 10062 for the equivalence of the latter with bj-omex 10067). (Contributed by BJ, 8-Dec-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bj-omex2	⊢ ω ∈ V

Proof of Theorem bj-omex2

Dummy variables 𝑥 𝑦 𝑎 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ax-inf2 10101	. . 3 ⊢ ∃𝑎∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ↔ (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑎 𝑥 = suc 𝑦))
2		vex 2560	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝑎 ∈ V
3		bdcv 9968	. . . . 5 ⊢ BOUNDED 𝑎
4	3	bj-inf2vn 10099	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑎 ∈ V → (∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ↔ (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑎 𝑥 = suc 𝑦)) → 𝑎 = ω))
5	2, 4	ax-mp 7	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ↔ (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑎 𝑥 = suc 𝑦)) → 𝑎 = ω)
6	1, 5	eximii 1493	. 2 ⊢ ∃𝑎 𝑎 = ω
7	6	issetri 2564	1 ⊢ ω ∈ V

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 98   ∨ wo 629  ∀wal 1241   = wceq 1243   ∈ wcel 1393  ∃wrex 2307  Vcvv 2557  ∅c0 3224  suc csuc 4102  ωcom 4313

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 99  ax-ia2 100  ax-ia3 101  ax-in1 544  ax-in2 545  ax-io 630  ax-5 1336  ax-7 1337  ax-gen 1338  ax-ie1 1382  ax-ie2 1383  ax-8 1395  ax-10 1396  ax-11 1397  ax-i12 1398  ax-bndl 1399  ax-4 1400  ax-13 1404  ax-14 1405  ax-17 1419  ax-i9 1423  ax-ial 1427  ax-i5r 1428  ax-ext 2022  ax-nul 3883  ax-pr 3944  ax-un 4170  ax-bd0 9933  ax-bdim 9934  ax-bdor 9936  ax-bdex 9939  ax-bdeq 9940  ax-bdel 9941  ax-bdsb 9942  ax-bdsep 10004  ax-bdsetind 10093  ax-inf2 10101

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 110  df-tru 1246  df-nf 1350  df-sb 1646  df-clab 2027  df-cleq 2033  df-clel 2036  df-nfc 2167  df-ral 2311  df-rex 2312  df-rab 2315  df-v 2559  df-dif 2920  df-un 2922  df-in 2924  df-ss 2931  df-nul 3225  df-sn 3381  df-pr 3382  df-uni 3581  df-int 3616  df-suc 4108  df-iom 4314  df-bdc 9961  df-bj-ind 10051

This theorem is referenced by: (None)