Theorem resoprab 5597

Description: Restriction of an operation class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 10-Feb-2007.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
resoprab	|- ( { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | ph } |` ( A X. B ) ) = { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | ( ( x e. A /\ y e. B ) /\ ph ) }

Distinct variable groups:   x, y, z, A   x, B, y, z

Allowed substitution hints:   ph( x, y, z)

Proof of Theorem resoprab

Dummy variable w is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		resopab 4652	. . 3 |- ( { <. w , z >. | E. x E. y ( w = <. x , y >. /\ ph ) } |` ( A X. B ) ) = { <. w , z >. | ( w e. ( A X. B ) /\ E. x E. y ( w = <. x , y >. /\ ph ) ) }
2		19.42vv 1788	. . . . 5 |- ( E. x E. y ( w e. ( A X. B ) /\ ( w = <. x , y >. /\ ph ) ) <-> ( w e. ( A X. B ) /\ E. x E. y ( w = <. x , y >. /\ ph ) ) )
3		an12 495	. . . . . . 7 |- ( ( w e. ( A X. B ) /\ ( w = <. x , y >. /\ ph ) ) <-> ( w = <. x , y >. /\ ( w e. ( A X. B ) /\ ph ) ) )
4		eleq1 2100	. . . . . . . . . 10 |- ( w = <. x , y >. -> ( w e. ( A X. B ) <-> <. x , y >. e. ( A X. B ) ) )
5		opelxp 4374	. . . . . . . . . 10 |- ( <. x , y >. e. ( A X. B ) <-> ( x e. A /\ y e. B ) )
6	4, 5	syl6bb 185	. . . . . . . . 9 |- ( w = <. x , y >. -> ( w e. ( A X. B ) <-> ( x e. A /\ y e. B ) ) )
7	6	anbi1d 438	. . . . . . . 8 |- ( w = <. x , y >. -> ( ( w e. ( A X. B ) /\ ph ) <-> ( ( x e. A /\ y e. B ) /\ ph ) ) )
8	7	pm5.32i 427	. . . . . . 7 |- ( ( w = <. x , y >. /\ ( w e. ( A X. B ) /\ ph ) ) <-> ( w = <. x , y >. /\ ( ( x e. A /\ y e. B ) /\ ph ) ) )
9	3, 8	bitri 173	. . . . . 6 |- ( ( w e. ( A X. B ) /\ ( w = <. x , y >. /\ ph ) ) <-> ( w = <. x , y >. /\ ( ( x e. A /\ y e. B ) /\ ph ) ) )
10	9	2exbii 1497	. . . . 5 |- ( E. x E. y ( w e. ( A X. B ) /\ ( w = <. x , y >. /\ ph ) ) <-> E. x E. y ( w = <. x , y >. /\ ( ( x e. A /\ y e. B ) /\ ph ) ) )
11	2, 10	bitr3i 175	. . . 4 |- ( ( w e. ( A X. B ) /\ E. x E. y ( w = <. x , y >. /\ ph ) ) <-> E. x E. y ( w = <. x , y >. /\ ( ( x e. A /\ y e. B ) /\ ph ) ) )
12	11	opabbii 3824	. . 3 |- { <. w , z >. | ( w e. ( A X. B ) /\ E. x E. y ( w = <. x , y >. /\ ph ) ) } = { <. w , z >. | E. x E. y ( w = <. x , y >. /\ ( ( x e. A /\ y e. B ) /\ ph ) ) }
13	1, 12	eqtri 2060	. 2 |- ( { <. w , z >. | E. x E. y ( w = <. x , y >. /\ ph ) } |` ( A X. B ) ) = { <. w , z >. | E. x E. y ( w = <. x , y >. /\ ( ( x e. A /\ y e. B ) /\ ph ) ) }
14		dfoprab2 5552	. . 3 |- { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | ph } = { <. w , z >. | E. x E. y ( w = <. x , y >. /\ ph ) }
15	14	reseq1i 4608	. 2 |- ( { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | ph } |` ( A X. B ) ) = ( { <. w , z >. | E. x E. y ( w = <. x , y >. /\ ph ) } |` ( A X. B ) )
16		dfoprab2 5552	. 2 |- { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | ( ( x e. A /\ y e. B ) /\ ph ) } = { <. w , z >. | E. x E. y ( w = <. x , y >. /\ ( ( x e. A /\ y e. B ) /\ ph ) ) }
17	13, 15, 16	3eqtr4i 2070	1 |- ( { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | ph } |` ( A X. B ) ) = { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | ( ( x e. A /\ y e. B ) /\ ph ) }

Syntax hints:   /\ wa 97   = wceq 1243   E.wex 1381   e. wcel 1393   <.cop 3378   {copab 3817   X. cxp 4343   |` cres 4347   {coprab 5513

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 99  ax-ia2 100  ax-ia3 101  ax-io 630  ax-5 1336  ax-7 1337  ax-gen 1338  ax-ie1 1382  ax-ie2 1383  ax-8 1395  ax-10 1396  ax-11 1397  ax-i12 1398  ax-bndl 1399  ax-4 1400  ax-14 1405  ax-17 1419  ax-i9 1423  ax-ial 1427  ax-i5r 1428  ax-ext 2022  ax-sep 3875  ax-pow 3927  ax-pr 3944

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 110  df-3an 887  df-tru 1246  df-nf 1350  df-sb 1646  df-clab 2027  df-cleq 2033  df-clel 2036  df-nfc 2167  df-ral 2311  df-rex 2312  df-v 2559  df-un 2922  df-in 2924  df-ss 2931  df-pw 3361  df-sn 3381  df-pr 3382  df-op 3384  df-opab 3819  df-xp 4351  df-rel 4352  df-res 4357  df-oprab 5516

This theorem is referenced by:  resoprab2  5598