Theorem sbcnestgf 2897

Description: Nest the composition of two substitutions. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Nov-2016.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
sbcnestgf	|- ( ( A e. V /\ A. y F/ x ph ) -> ( [. A / x ]. [. B / y ]. ph <-> [. [_ A / x ]_ B / y ]. ph ) )

Proof of Theorem sbcnestgf

Dummy variable z is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		dfsbcq 2766	. . . . 5 |- ( z = A -> ( [. z / x ]. [. B / y ]. ph <-> [. A / x ]. [. B / y ]. ph ) )
2		csbeq1 2855	. . . . . 6 |- ( z = A -> [_ z / x ]_ B = [_ A / x ]_ B )
3		dfsbcq 2766	. . . . . 6 |- ( [_ z / x ]_ B = [_ A / x ]_ B -> ( [. [_ z / x ]_ B / y ]. ph <-> [. [_ A / x ]_ B / y ]. ph ) )
4	2, 3	syl 14	. . . . 5 |- ( z = A -> ( [. [_ z / x ]_ B / y ]. ph <-> [. [_ A / x ]_ B / y ]. ph ) )
5	1, 4	bibi12d 224	. . . 4 |- ( z = A -> ( ( [. z / x ]. [. B / y ]. ph <-> [. [_ z / x ]_ B / y ]. ph ) <-> ( [. A / x ]. [. B / y ]. ph <-> [. [_ A / x ]_ B / y ]. ph ) ) )
6	5	imbi2d 219	. . 3 |- ( z = A -> ( ( A. y F/ x ph -> ( [. z / x ]. [. B / y ]. ph <-> [. [_ z / x ]_ B / y ]. ph ) ) <-> ( A. y F/ x ph -> ( [. A / x ]. [. B / y ]. ph <-> [. [_ A / x ]_ B / y ]. ph ) ) ) )
7		vex 2560	. . . . 5 |- z e. _V
8	7	a1i 9	. . . 4 |- ( A. y F/ x ph -> z e. _V )
9		csbeq1a 2860	. . . . . 6 |- ( x = z -> B = [_ z / x ]_ B )
10		dfsbcq 2766	. . . . . 6 |- ( B = [_ z / x ]_ B -> ( [. B / y ]. ph <-> [. [_ z / x ]_ B / y ]. ph ) )
11	9, 10	syl 14	. . . . 5 |- ( x = z -> ( [. B / y ]. ph <-> [. [_ z / x ]_ B / y ]. ph ) )
12	11	adantl 262	. . . 4 |- ( ( A. y F/ x ph /\ x = z ) -> ( [. B / y ]. ph <-> [. [_ z / x ]_ B / y ]. ph ) )
13		nfnf1 1436	. . . . 5 |- F/ x F/ x ph
14	13	nfal 1468	. . . 4 |- F/ x A. y F/ x ph
15		nfa1 1434	. . . . 5 |- F/ y A. y F/ x ph
16		nfcsb1v 2882	. . . . . 6 |- F/_ x [_ z / x ]_ B
17	16	a1i 9	. . . . 5 |- ( A. y F/ x ph -> F/_ x [_ z / x ]_ B )
18		sp 1401	. . . . 5 |- ( A. y F/ x ph -> F/ x ph )
19	15, 17, 18	nfsbcd 2783	. . . 4 |- ( A. y F/ x ph -> F/ x [. [_ z / x ]_ B / y ]. ph )
20	8, 12, 14, 19	sbciedf 2798	. . 3 |- ( A. y F/ x ph -> ( [. z / x ]. [. B / y ]. ph <-> [. [_ z / x ]_ B / y ]. ph ) )
21	6, 20	vtoclg 2613	. 2 |- ( A e. V -> ( A. y F/ x ph -> ( [. A / x ]. [. B / y ]. ph <-> [. [_ A / x ]_ B / y ]. ph ) ) )
22	21	imp 115	1 |- ( ( A e. V /\ A. y F/ x ph ) -> ( [. A / x ]. [. B / y ]. ph <-> [. [_ A / x ]_ B / y ]. ph ) )

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   /\ wa 97   <-> wb 98   A.wal 1241   = wceq 1243   F/wnf 1349   e. wcel 1393   F/_wnfc 2165   _Vcvv 2557   [.wsbc 2764   [_csb 2852

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 99  ax-ia2 100  ax-ia3 101  ax-io 630  ax-5 1336  ax-7 1337  ax-gen 1338  ax-ie1 1382  ax-ie2 1383  ax-8 1395  ax-10 1396  ax-11 1397  ax-i12 1398  ax-bndl 1399  ax-4 1400  ax-17 1419  ax-i9 1423  ax-ial 1427  ax-i5r 1428  ax-ext 2022

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 110  df-3an 887  df-tru 1246  df-nf 1350  df-sb 1646  df-clab 2027  df-cleq 2033  df-clel 2036  df-nfc 2167  df-v 2559  df-sbc 2765  df-csb 2853

This theorem is referenced by:  csbnestgf  2898  sbcnestg  2899