Theorem sbciedf 2798

Description: Conversion of implicit substitution to explicit class substitution, deduction form. (Contributed by NM, 29-Dec-2014.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
sbcied.1	|- ( ph -> A e. V )
sbcied.2	|- ( ( ph /\ x = A ) -> ( ps <-> ch ) )
sbciedf.3	|- F/ x ph
sbciedf.4	|- ( ph -> F/ x ch )

Assertion

Ref	Expression
sbciedf	|- ( ph -> ( [. A / x ]. ps <-> ch ) )

Distinct variable group:   x, A

Allowed substitution hints:   ph( x)   ps( x)   ch( x)   V( x)

Proof of Theorem sbciedf

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		sbcied.1	. 2 |- ( ph -> A e. V )
2		sbciedf.4	. 2 |- ( ph -> F/ x ch )
3		sbciedf.3	. . 3 |- F/ x ph
4		sbcied.2	. . . 4 |- ( ( ph /\ x = A ) -> ( ps <-> ch ) )
5	4	ex 108	. . 3 |- ( ph -> ( x = A -> ( ps <-> ch ) ) )
6	3, 5	alrimi 1415	. 2 |- ( ph -> A. x ( x = A -> ( ps <-> ch ) ) )
7		sbciegft 2793	. 2 |- ( ( A e. V /\ F/ x ch /\ A. x ( x = A -> ( ps <-> ch ) ) ) -> ( [. A / x ]. ps <-> ch ) )
8	1, 2, 6, 7	syl3anc 1135	1 |- ( ph -> ( [. A / x ]. ps <-> ch ) )

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   /\ wa 97   <-> wb 98   A.wal 1241   = wceq 1243   F/wnf 1349   e. wcel 1393   [.wsbc 2764

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 99  ax-ia2 100  ax-ia3 101  ax-io 630  ax-5 1336  ax-7 1337  ax-gen 1338  ax-ie1 1382  ax-ie2 1383  ax-8 1395  ax-10 1396  ax-11 1397  ax-i12 1398  ax-bndl 1399  ax-4 1400  ax-17 1419  ax-i9 1423  ax-ial 1427  ax-i5r 1428  ax-ext 2022

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 110  df-3an 887  df-tru 1246  df-nf 1350  df-sb 1646  df-clab 2027  df-cleq 2033  df-clel 2036  df-nfc 2167  df-v 2559  df-sbc 2765

This theorem is referenced by:  sbcied  2799  sbc2iegf  2828  csbiebt  2886  sbcnestgf  2897  ovmpt2dxf  5626