Theorem mopick2 1983

Description: "At most one" can show the existence of a common value. In this case we can infer existence of conjunction from a conjunction of existence, and it is one way to achieve the converse of 19.40 1522. (Contributed by NM, 5-Apr-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 9-Jul-2011.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
mopick2	⊢ ((∃*𝑥𝜑 ∧ ∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ ∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜒)) → ∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒))

Proof of Theorem mopick2

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		hbmo1 1938	. . . 4 ⊢ (∃*𝑥𝜑 → ∀𝑥∃*𝑥𝜑)
2		hbe1 1384	. . . 4 ⊢ (∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → ∀𝑥∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))
3	1, 2	hban 1439	. . 3 ⊢ ((∃*𝑥𝜑 ∧ ∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)) → ∀𝑥(∃*𝑥𝜑 ∧ ∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)))
4		mopick 1978	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((∃*𝑥𝜑 ∧ ∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)) → (𝜑 → 𝜓))
5	4	ancld 308	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((∃*𝑥𝜑 ∧ ∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)) → (𝜑 → (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)))
6	5	anim1d 319	. . . 4 ⊢ ((∃*𝑥𝜑 ∧ ∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)) → ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) → ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜒)))
7		df-3an 887	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) ↔ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜒))
8	6, 7	syl6ibr 151	. . 3 ⊢ ((∃*𝑥𝜑 ∧ ∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)) → ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) → (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)))
9	3, 8	eximdh 1502	. 2 ⊢ ((∃*𝑥𝜑 ∧ ∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)) → (∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) → ∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)))
10	9	3impia 1101	1 ⊢ ((∃*𝑥𝜑 ∧ ∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ ∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜒)) → ∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 97   ∧ w3a 885  ∃wex 1381  ∃*wmo 1901

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 99  ax-ia2 100  ax-ia3 101  ax-io 630  ax-5 1336  ax-7 1337  ax-gen 1338  ax-ie1 1382  ax-ie2 1383  ax-8 1395  ax-10 1396  ax-11 1397  ax-i12 1398  ax-bndl 1399  ax-4 1400  ax-17 1419  ax-i9 1423  ax-ial 1427  ax-i5r 1428

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 110  df-3an 887  df-nf 1350  df-sb 1646  df-eu 1903  df-mo 1904

This theorem is referenced by: (None)