Theorem tfrlem3-2d 5928

Description: Lemma for transfinite recursion which changes a bound variable (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 2-Jul-2019.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
tfrlem3-2d.1	|- ( ph -> A. x ( Fun F /\ ( F ` x ) e. _V ) )

Assertion

Ref	Expression
tfrlem3-2d	|- ( ph -> ( Fun F /\ ( F ` g ) e. _V ) )

Distinct variable group:   x, g, F

Allowed substitution hints:   ph( x, g)

Proof of Theorem tfrlem3-2d

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		tfrlem3-2d.1	. . 3 |- ( ph -> A. x ( Fun F /\ ( F ` x ) e. _V ) )
2		fveq2 5178	. . . . . 6 |- ( x = g -> ( F ` x ) = ( F ` g ) )
3	2	eleq1d 2106	. . . . 5 |- ( x = g -> ( ( F ` x ) e. _V <-> ( F ` g ) e. _V ) )
4	3	anbi2d 437	. . . 4 |- ( x = g -> ( ( Fun F /\ ( F ` x ) e. _V ) <-> ( Fun F /\ ( F ` g ) e. _V ) ) )
5	4	cbvalv 1794	. . 3 |- ( A. x ( Fun F /\ ( F ` x ) e. _V ) <-> A. g ( Fun F /\ ( F ` g ) e. _V ) )
6	1, 5	sylib 127	. 2 |- ( ph -> A. g ( Fun F /\ ( F ` g ) e. _V ) )
7	6	19.21bi 1450	1 |- ( ph -> ( Fun F /\ ( F ` g ) e. _V ) )

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   /\ wa 97   A.wal 1241   e. wcel 1393   _Vcvv 2557   Fun wfun 4896   ` cfv 4902

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 99  ax-ia2 100  ax-ia3 101  ax-io 630  ax-5 1336  ax-7 1337  ax-gen 1338  ax-ie1 1382  ax-ie2 1383  ax-8 1395  ax-10 1396  ax-11 1397  ax-i12 1398  ax-bndl 1399  ax-4 1400  ax-17 1419  ax-i9 1423  ax-ial 1427  ax-i5r 1428  ax-ext 2022

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 110  df-3an 887  df-tru 1246  df-nf 1350  df-sb 1646  df-clab 2027  df-cleq 2033  df-clel 2036  df-nfc 2167  df-rex 2312  df-v 2559  df-un 2922  df-sn 3381  df-pr 3382  df-op 3384  df-uni 3581  df-br 3765  df-iota 4867  df-fv 4910

This theorem is referenced by:  tfrlemisucfn  5938  tfrlemisucaccv  5939  tfrlemibxssdm  5941  tfrlemibfn  5942  tfrlemi14d  5947