![]() |
Intuitionistic Logic Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
|
Mirrors > Home > ILE Home > Th. List > ss2rab | GIF version |
Description: Restricted abstraction classes in a subclass relationship. (Contributed by NM, 30-May-1999.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
ss2rab | ⊢ ({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓} ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 → 𝜓)) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | df-rab 2315 | . . 3 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} | |
2 | df-rab 2315 | . . 3 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓)} | |
3 | 1, 2 | sseq12i 2971 | . 2 ⊢ ({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓} ↔ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} ⊆ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓)}) |
4 | ss2ab 3008 | . 2 ⊢ ({𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} ⊆ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓)} ↔ ∀𝑥((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓))) | |
5 | df-ral 2311 | . . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 → 𝜓) ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝜑 → 𝜓))) | |
6 | imdistan 418 | . . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝜑 → 𝜓)) ↔ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓))) | |
7 | 6 | albii 1359 | . . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝜑 → 𝜓)) ↔ ∀𝑥((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓))) |
8 | 5, 7 | bitr2i 174 | . 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓)) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 → 𝜓)) |
9 | 3, 4, 8 | 3bitri 195 | 1 ⊢ ({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓} ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 → 𝜓)) |
Colors of variables: wff set class |
Syntax hints: → wi 4 ∧ wa 97 ↔ wb 98 ∀wal 1241 ∈ wcel 1393 {cab 2026 ∀wral 2306 {crab 2310 ⊆ wss 2917 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-1 5 ax-2 6 ax-mp 7 ax-ia1 99 ax-ia2 100 ax-ia3 101 ax-io 630 ax-5 1336 ax-7 1337 ax-gen 1338 ax-ie1 1382 ax-ie2 1383 ax-8 1395 ax-10 1396 ax-11 1397 ax-i12 1398 ax-bndl 1399 ax-4 1400 ax-17 1419 ax-i9 1423 ax-ial 1427 ax-i5r 1428 ax-ext 2022 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 110 df-nf 1350 df-sb 1646 df-clab 2027 df-cleq 2033 df-clel 2036 df-nfc 2167 df-ral 2311 df-rab 2315 df-in 2924 df-ss 2931 |
This theorem is referenced by: ss2rabdv 3021 ss2rabi 3022 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |