Theorem ss2rab 3016

Description: Restricted abstraction classes in a subclass relationship. (Contributed by NM, 30-May-1999.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ss2rab	|- ( { x e. A | ph } C_ { x e. A | ps } <-> A. x e. A ( ph -> ps ) )

Proof of Theorem ss2rab

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-rab 2315	. . 3 |- { x e. A | ph } = { x | ( x e. A /\ ph ) }
2		df-rab 2315	. . 3 |- { x e. A | ps } = { x | ( x e. A /\ ps ) }
3	1, 2	sseq12i 2971	. 2 |- ( { x e. A | ph } C_ { x e. A | ps } <-> { x | ( x e. A /\ ph ) } C_ { x | ( x e. A /\ ps ) } )
4		ss2ab 3008	. 2 |- ( { x | ( x e. A /\ ph ) } C_ { x | ( x e. A /\ ps ) } <-> A. x ( ( x e. A /\ ph ) -> ( x e. A /\ ps ) ) )
5		df-ral 2311	. . 3 |- ( A. x e. A ( ph -> ps ) <-> A. x ( x e. A -> ( ph -> ps ) ) )
6		imdistan 418	. . . 4 |- ( ( x e. A -> ( ph -> ps ) ) <-> ( ( x e. A /\ ph ) -> ( x e. A /\ ps ) ) )
7	6	albii 1359	. . 3 |- ( A. x ( x e. A -> ( ph -> ps ) ) <-> A. x ( ( x e. A /\ ph ) -> ( x e. A /\ ps ) ) )
8	5, 7	bitr2i 174	. 2 |- ( A. x ( ( x e. A /\ ph ) -> ( x e. A /\ ps ) ) <-> A. x e. A ( ph -> ps ) )
9	3, 4, 8	3bitri 195	1 |- ( { x e. A | ph } C_ { x e. A | ps } <-> A. x e. A ( ph -> ps ) )

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   /\ wa 97   <-> wb 98   A.wal 1241   e. wcel 1393   {cab 2026   A.wral 2306   {crab 2310   C_ wss 2917

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 99  ax-ia2 100  ax-ia3 101  ax-io 630  ax-5 1336  ax-7 1337  ax-gen 1338  ax-ie1 1382  ax-ie2 1383  ax-8 1395  ax-10 1396  ax-11 1397  ax-i12 1398  ax-bndl 1399  ax-4 1400  ax-17 1419  ax-i9 1423  ax-ial 1427  ax-i5r 1428  ax-ext 2022

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 110  df-nf 1350  df-sb 1646  df-clab 2027  df-cleq 2033  df-clel 2036  df-nfc 2167  df-ral 2311  df-rab 2315  df-in 2924  df-ss 2931

This theorem is referenced by:  ss2rabdv  3021  ss2rabi  3022