| Intuitionistic Logic Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
| Mirrors > Home > ILE Home > Th. List > intexrabim | GIF version | ||
| Description: The intersection of an inhabited restricted class abstraction exists. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 27-Aug-2018.) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| intexrabim | ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → ∩ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ∈ V) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | intexabim 3906 | . 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) → ∩ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} ∈ V) | |
| 2 | df-rex 2312 | . 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)) | |
| 3 | df-rab 2315 | . . . 4 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} | |
| 4 | 3 | inteqi 3619 | . . 3 ⊢ ∩ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = ∩ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} |
| 5 | 4 | eleq1i 2103 | . 2 ⊢ (∩ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ∈ V ↔ ∩ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} ∈ V) |
| 6 | 1, 2, 5 | 3imtr4i 190 | 1 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → ∩ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ∈ V) |
| Colors of variables: wff set class |
| Syntax hints: → wi 4 ∧ wa 97 ∃wex 1381 ∈ wcel 1393 {cab 2026 ∃wrex 2307 {crab 2310 Vcvv 2557 ∩ cint 3615 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-1 5 ax-2 6 ax-mp 7 ax-ia1 99 ax-ia2 100 ax-ia3 101 ax-io 630 ax-5 1336 ax-7 1337 ax-gen 1338 ax-ie1 1382 ax-ie2 1383 ax-8 1395 ax-10 1396 ax-11 1397 ax-i12 1398 ax-bndl 1399 ax-4 1400 ax-17 1419 ax-i9 1423 ax-ial 1427 ax-i5r 1428 ax-ext 2022 ax-sep 3875 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 110 df-tru 1246 df-nf 1350 df-sb 1646 df-clab 2027 df-cleq 2033 df-clel 2036 df-nfc 2167 df-ral 2311 df-rex 2312 df-rab 2315 df-v 2559 df-in 2924 df-ss 2931 df-int 3616 |
| This theorem is referenced by: cardcl 6361 isnumi 6362 cardval3ex 6365 |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |