Theorem sbciegft 2793

Description: Conversion of implicit substitution to explicit class substitution, using a bound-variable hypothesis instead of distinct variables. (Closed theorem version of sbciegf 2794.) (Contributed by NM, 10-Nov-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 13-Oct-2016.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
sbciegft	|- ( ( A e. V /\ F/ x ps /\ A. x ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) ) ) -> ( [. A / x ]. ph <-> ps ) )

Distinct variable group:   x, A

Allowed substitution hints:   ph( x)   ps( x)   V( x)

Proof of Theorem sbciegft

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		sbc5 2787	. . 3 |- ( [. A / x ]. ph <-> E. x ( x = A /\ ph ) )
2		bi1 111	. . . . . . . 8 |- ( ( ph <-> ps ) -> ( ph -> ps ) )
3	2	imim2i 12	. . . . . . 7 |- ( ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) ) -> ( x = A -> ( ph -> ps ) ) )
4	3	impd 242	. . . . . 6 |- ( ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) ) -> ( ( x = A /\ ph ) -> ps ) )
5	4	alimi 1344	. . . . 5 |- ( A. x ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) ) -> A. x ( ( x = A /\ ph ) -> ps ) )
6		19.23t 1567	. . . . . 6 |- ( F/ x ps -> ( A. x ( ( x = A /\ ph ) -> ps ) <-> ( E. x ( x = A /\ ph ) -> ps ) ) )
7	6	biimpa 280	. . . . 5 |- ( ( F/ x ps /\ A. x ( ( x = A /\ ph ) -> ps ) ) -> ( E. x ( x = A /\ ph ) -> ps ) )
8	5, 7	sylan2 270	. . . 4 |- ( ( F/ x ps /\ A. x ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) ) ) -> ( E. x ( x = A /\ ph ) -> ps ) )
9	8	3adant1 922	. . 3 |- ( ( A e. V /\ F/ x ps /\ A. x ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) ) ) -> ( E. x ( x = A /\ ph ) -> ps ) )
10	1, 9	syl5bi 141	. 2 |- ( ( A e. V /\ F/ x ps /\ A. x ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) ) ) -> ( [. A / x ]. ph -> ps ) )
11		bi2 121	. . . . . . . 8 |- ( ( ph <-> ps ) -> ( ps -> ph ) )
12	11	imim2i 12	. . . . . . 7 |- ( ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) ) -> ( x = A -> ( ps -> ph ) ) )
13	12	com23 72	. . . . . 6 |- ( ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) ) -> ( ps -> ( x = A -> ph ) ) )
14	13	alimi 1344	. . . . 5 |- ( A. x ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) ) -> A. x ( ps -> ( x = A -> ph ) ) )
15		19.21t 1474	. . . . . 6 |- ( F/ x ps -> ( A. x ( ps -> ( x = A -> ph ) ) <-> ( ps -> A. x ( x = A -> ph ) ) ) )
16	15	biimpa 280	. . . . 5 |- ( ( F/ x ps /\ A. x ( ps -> ( x = A -> ph ) ) ) -> ( ps -> A. x ( x = A -> ph ) ) )
17	14, 16	sylan2 270	. . . 4 |- ( ( F/ x ps /\ A. x ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) ) ) -> ( ps -> A. x ( x = A -> ph ) ) )
18	17	3adant1 922	. . 3 |- ( ( A e. V /\ F/ x ps /\ A. x ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) ) ) -> ( ps -> A. x ( x = A -> ph ) ) )
19		sbc6g 2788	. . . 4 |- ( A e. V -> ( [. A / x ]. ph <-> A. x ( x = A -> ph ) ) )
20	19	3ad2ant1 925	. . 3 |- ( ( A e. V /\ F/ x ps /\ A. x ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) ) ) -> ( [. A / x ]. ph <-> A. x ( x = A -> ph ) ) )
21	18, 20	sylibrd 158	. 2 |- ( ( A e. V /\ F/ x ps /\ A. x ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) ) ) -> ( ps -> [. A / x ]. ph ) )
22	10, 21	impbid 120	1 |- ( ( A e. V /\ F/ x ps /\ A. x ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) ) ) -> ( [. A / x ]. ph <-> ps ) )

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   /\ wa 97   <-> wb 98   /\ w3a 885   A.wal 1241   = wceq 1243   F/wnf 1349   E.wex 1381   e. wcel 1393   [.wsbc 2764

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 99  ax-ia2 100  ax-ia3 101  ax-io 630  ax-5 1336  ax-7 1337  ax-gen 1338  ax-ie1 1382  ax-ie2 1383  ax-8 1395  ax-10 1396  ax-11 1397  ax-i12 1398  ax-bndl 1399  ax-4 1400  ax-17 1419  ax-i9 1423  ax-ial 1427  ax-i5r 1428  ax-ext 2022

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 110  df-3an 887  df-tru 1246  df-nf 1350  df-sb 1646  df-clab 2027  df-cleq 2033  df-clel 2036  df-nfc 2167  df-v 2559  df-sbc 2765

This theorem is referenced by:  sbciegf  2794  sbciedf  2798