Theorem bj-vtoclgft 9914

Description: Weakening two hypotheses of vtoclgf 2612. (Contributed by BJ, 21-Nov-2019.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
bj-vtoclgf.nf1	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
bj-vtoclgf.nf2	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓
bj-vtoclgf.min	⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝜑)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bj-vtoclgft	⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 → 𝜓)) → (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝜓))

Proof of Theorem bj-vtoclgft

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		elex 2566	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐴 ∈ V)
2		bj-vtoclgf.nf1	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
3	2	issetf 2562	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ V ↔ ∃𝑥 𝑥 = 𝐴)
4		bj-vtoclgf.nf2	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓
5		bj-vtoclgf.min	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝜑)
6	4, 5	bj-exlimmp 9909	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 → 𝜓)) → (∃𝑥 𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝜓))
7	3, 6	syl5bi 141	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 → 𝜓)) → (𝐴 ∈ V → 𝜓))
8	1, 7	syl5 28	1 ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 → 𝜓)) → (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝜓))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4  ∀wal 1241   = wceq 1243  Ⅎwnf 1349  ∃wex 1381   ∈ wcel 1393  Ⅎwnfc 2165  Vcvv 2557

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 99  ax-ia2 100  ax-ia3 101  ax-io 630  ax-5 1336  ax-7 1337  ax-gen 1338  ax-ie1 1382  ax-ie2 1383  ax-8 1395  ax-10 1396  ax-11 1397  ax-i12 1398  ax-bndl 1399  ax-4 1400  ax-17 1419  ax-i9 1423  ax-ial 1427  ax-i5r 1428  ax-ext 2022

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 110  df-tru 1246  df-nf 1350  df-sb 1646  df-clab 2027  df-cleq 2033  df-clel 2036  df-nfc 2167  df-v 2559

This theorem is referenced by:  bj-vtoclgf  9915  elabgft1  9917  bj-rspgt  9925