Theorem dfsb7a 1870

Description: An alternative definition of proper substitution df-sb 1646. Similar to dfsb7 1867 in that it involves a dummy variable z, but expressed in terms of A. rather than E.. For a version which only requires F/ z ph rather than z and ph being distinct, see sb7af 1869. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 5-Feb-2018.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
dfsb7a	|- ( [ y / x ] ph <-> A. z ( z = y -> A. x ( x = z -> ph ) ) )

Distinct variable groups:   x, z   y, z   ph, z

Allowed substitution hints:   ph( x, y)

Proof of Theorem dfsb7a

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		nfv 1421	. 2 |- F/ z ph
2	1	sb7af 1869	1 |- ( [ y / x ] ph <-> A. z ( z = y -> A. x ( x = z -> ph ) ) )

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   <-> wb 98   A.wal 1241   [wsb 1645

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 99  ax-ia2 100  ax-ia3 101  ax-io 630  ax-5 1336  ax-7 1337  ax-gen 1338  ax-ie1 1382  ax-ie2 1383  ax-8 1395  ax-10 1396  ax-11 1397  ax-i12 1398  ax-bndl 1399  ax-4 1400  ax-17 1419  ax-i9 1423  ax-ial 1427  ax-i5r 1428

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 110  df-nf 1350  df-sb 1646

This theorem is referenced by: (None)