Theorem ssoprab2 5561

Description: Equivalence of ordered pair abstraction subclass and implication. Compare ssopab2 4012. (Contributed by FL, 6-Nov-2013.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 11-Dec-2016.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ssoprab2	⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦∀𝑧(𝜑 → 𝜓) → {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜓})

Proof of Theorem ssoprab2

Dummy variable 𝑤 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		id 19	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ ((𝜑 → 𝜓) → (𝜑 → 𝜓))
2	1	anim2d 320	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝜑 → 𝜓) → ((𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑) → (𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜓)))
3	2	alimi 1344	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (∀𝑧(𝜑 → 𝜓) → ∀𝑧((𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑) → (𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜓)))
4		exim 1490	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (∀𝑧((𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑) → (𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜓)) → (∃𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑) → ∃𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜓)))
5	3, 4	syl 14	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (∀𝑧(𝜑 → 𝜓) → (∃𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑) → ∃𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜓)))
6	5	alimi 1344	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (∀𝑦∀𝑧(𝜑 → 𝜓) → ∀𝑦(∃𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑) → ∃𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜓)))
7		exim 1490	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (∀𝑦(∃𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑) → ∃𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜓)) → (∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑) → ∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜓)))
8	6, 7	syl 14	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∀𝑦∀𝑧(𝜑 → 𝜓) → (∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑) → ∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜓)))
9	8	alimi 1344	. . . 4 ⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦∀𝑧(𝜑 → 𝜓) → ∀𝑥(∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑) → ∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜓)))
10		exim 1490	. . . 4 ⊢ (∀𝑥(∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑) → ∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜓)) → (∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑) → ∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜓)))
11	9, 10	syl 14	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦∀𝑧(𝜑 → 𝜓) → (∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑) → ∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜓)))
12	11	ss2abdv 3013	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦∀𝑧(𝜑 → 𝜓) → {𝑤 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑)} ⊆ {𝑤 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜓)})
13		df-oprab 5516	. 2 ⊢ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑤 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑)}
14		df-oprab 5516	. 2 ⊢ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜓} = {𝑤 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜓)}
15	12, 13, 14	3sstr4g 2986	1 ⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦∀𝑧(𝜑 → 𝜓) → {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜓})

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 97  ∀wal 1241   = wceq 1243  ∃wex 1381  {cab 2026   ⊆ wss 2917  ⟨cop 3378  {coprab 5513

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 99  ax-ia2 100  ax-ia3 101  ax-io 630  ax-5 1336  ax-7 1337  ax-gen 1338  ax-ie1 1382  ax-ie2 1383  ax-8 1395  ax-10 1396  ax-11 1397  ax-i12 1398  ax-bndl 1399  ax-4 1400  ax-17 1419  ax-i9 1423  ax-ial 1427  ax-i5r 1428  ax-ext 2022

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 110  df-nf 1350  df-sb 1646  df-clab 2027  df-cleq 2033  df-clel 2036  df-nfc 2167  df-in 2924  df-ss 2931  df-oprab 5516

This theorem is referenced by:  ssoprab2b  5562