Theorem eqvincf 2669

Description: A variable introduction law for class equality, using bound-variable hypotheses instead of distinct variable conditions. (Contributed by NM, 14-Sep-2003.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
eqvincf.1	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
eqvincf.2	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵
eqvincf.3	⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V

Assertion

Ref	Expression
eqvincf	⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐵))

Proof of Theorem eqvincf

Dummy variable 𝑦 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		eqvincf.3	. . 3 ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V
2	1	eqvinc 2667	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑦(𝑦 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵))
3		eqvincf.1	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
4	3	nfeq2 2189	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝑦 = 𝐴
5		eqvincf.2	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵
6	5	nfeq2 2189	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝑦 = 𝐵
7	4, 6	nfan 1457	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(𝑦 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵)
8		nfv 1421	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐵)
9		eqeq1 2046	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑥 → (𝑦 = 𝐴 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝐴))
10		eqeq1 2046	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑥 → (𝑦 = 𝐵 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝐵))
11	9, 10	anbi12d 442	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑥 → ((𝑦 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵) ↔ (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐵)))
12	7, 8, 11	cbvex 1639	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑦(𝑦 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵) ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐵))
13	2, 12	bitri 173	1 ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐵))

Syntax hints:   ∧ wa 97   ↔ wb 98   = wceq 1243  ∃wex 1381   ∈ wcel 1393  Ⅎwnfc 2165  Vcvv 2557

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 99  ax-ia2 100  ax-ia3 101  ax-io 630  ax-5 1336  ax-7 1337  ax-gen 1338  ax-ie1 1382  ax-ie2 1383  ax-8 1395  ax-10 1396  ax-11 1397  ax-i12 1398  ax-bndl 1399  ax-4 1400  ax-17 1419  ax-i9 1423  ax-ial 1427  ax-i5r 1428  ax-ext 2022

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 110  df-tru 1246  df-nf 1350  df-sb 1646  df-clab 2027  df-cleq 2033  df-clel 2036  df-nfc 2167  df-v 2559

This theorem is referenced by: (None)