Theorem bdzfauscl 10010

Description: Closed form of the version of zfauscl 3877 for bounded formulas using bounded separation. (Contributed by BJ, 13-Nov-2019.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
bdzfauscl.bd	⊢ BOUNDED 𝜑

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bdzfauscl	⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ∃𝑦∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑦,𝐴   𝜑,𝑦

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥)   𝑉(𝑥,𝑦)

Proof of Theorem bdzfauscl

Dummy variable 𝑧 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		eleq2 2101	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝐴 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 ↔ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴))
2	1	anbi1d 438	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝐴 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)))
3	2	bibi2d 221	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝐴 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ 𝜑)) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑))))
4	3	albidv 1705	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝐴 → (∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ 𝜑)) ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑))))
5	4	exbidv 1706	. 2 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝐴 → (∃𝑦∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ 𝜑)) ↔ ∃𝑦∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑))))
6		bdzfauscl.bd	. . 3 ⊢ BOUNDED 𝜑
7	6	bdsep1 10005	. 2 ⊢ ∃𝑦∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ 𝜑))
8	5, 7	vtoclg 2613	1 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ∃𝑦∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 97   ↔ wb 98  ∀wal 1241   = wceq 1243  ∃wex 1381   ∈ wcel 1393  BOUNDED wbd 9932

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 99  ax-ia2 100  ax-ia3 101  ax-io 630  ax-5 1336  ax-7 1337  ax-gen 1338  ax-ie1 1382  ax-ie2 1383  ax-8 1395  ax-10 1396  ax-11 1397  ax-i12 1398  ax-bndl 1399  ax-4 1400  ax-17 1419  ax-i9 1423  ax-ial 1427  ax-i5r 1428  ax-ext 2022  ax-bdsep 10004

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 110  df-tru 1246  df-nf 1350  df-sb 1646  df-clab 2027  df-cleq 2033  df-clel 2036  df-nfc 2167  df-v 2559

This theorem is referenced by:  bdinex1  10019