![]() |
Intuitionistic Logic Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
|
Mirrors > Home > ILE Home > Th. List > rmoeq1f | GIF version |
Description: Equality theorem for restricted uniqueness quantifier, with bound-variable hypotheses instead of distinct variable restrictions. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 17-Jun-2017.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
raleq1f.1 | ⊢ ℲxA |
raleq1f.2 | ⊢ ℲxB |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
rmoeq1f | ⊢ (A = B → (∃*x ∈ A φ ↔ ∃*x ∈ B φ)) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | raleq1f.1 | . . . 4 ⊢ ℲxA | |
2 | raleq1f.2 | . . . 4 ⊢ ℲxB | |
3 | 1, 2 | nfeq 2182 | . . 3 ⊢ Ⅎx A = B |
4 | eleq2 2098 | . . . 4 ⊢ (A = B → (x ∈ A ↔ x ∈ B)) | |
5 | 4 | anbi1d 438 | . . 3 ⊢ (A = B → ((x ∈ A ∧ φ) ↔ (x ∈ B ∧ φ))) |
6 | 3, 5 | mobid 1932 | . 2 ⊢ (A = B → (∃*x(x ∈ A ∧ φ) ↔ ∃*x(x ∈ B ∧ φ))) |
7 | df-rmo 2308 | . 2 ⊢ (∃*x ∈ A φ ↔ ∃*x(x ∈ A ∧ φ)) | |
8 | df-rmo 2308 | . 2 ⊢ (∃*x ∈ B φ ↔ ∃*x(x ∈ B ∧ φ)) | |
9 | 6, 7, 8 | 3bitr4g 212 | 1 ⊢ (A = B → (∃*x ∈ A φ ↔ ∃*x ∈ B φ)) |
Colors of variables: wff set class |
Syntax hints: → wi 4 ∧ wa 97 ↔ wb 98 = wceq 1242 ∈ wcel 1390 ∃*wmo 1898 Ⅎwnfc 2162 ∃*wrmo 2303 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-1 5 ax-2 6 ax-mp 7 ax-ia1 99 ax-ia2 100 ax-ia3 101 ax-io 629 ax-5 1333 ax-7 1334 ax-gen 1335 ax-ie1 1379 ax-ie2 1380 ax-8 1392 ax-10 1393 ax-11 1394 ax-i12 1395 ax-bndl 1396 ax-4 1397 ax-17 1416 ax-i9 1420 ax-ial 1424 ax-i5r 1425 ax-ext 2019 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 110 df-tru 1245 df-nf 1347 df-sb 1643 df-eu 1900 df-mo 1901 df-cleq 2030 df-clel 2033 df-nfc 2164 df-rmo 2308 |
This theorem is referenced by: rmoeq1 2502 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |