Theorem elrab3t 2697

Description: Membership in a restricted class abstraction, using implicit substitution. (Closed theorem version of elrab3 2699.) (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 31-Aug-2017.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
elrab3t	⊢ ((∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝐴 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝜓))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴   𝑥,𝐵   𝜓,𝑥

Allowed substitution hint:   𝜑(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem elrab3t

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		simpr 103	. . 3 ⊢ ((∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)
2		nfa1 1434	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
3		nfv 1421	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵
4	2, 3	nfan 1457	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)
5		simpl 102	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)))
6	5	19.21bi 1450	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)))
7		eleq1 2100	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵))
8	7	biimparc 283	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)
9	8	biantrurd 289	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → (𝜑 ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)))
10	9	bibi1d 222	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ↔ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ 𝜓)))
11	10	pm5.74da 417	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → ((𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ↔ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ 𝜓))))
12	11	adantl 262	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) → ((𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ↔ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ 𝜓))))
13	6, 12	mpbid 135	. . . 4 ⊢ ((∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑥 = 𝐴 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ 𝜓)))
14	4, 13	alrimi 1415	. . 3 ⊢ ((∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ 𝜓)))
15		elabgt 2684	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ 𝜓))) → (𝐴 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)} ↔ 𝜓))
16	1, 14, 15	syl2anc 391	. 2 ⊢ ((∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝐴 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)} ↔ 𝜓))
17		df-rab 2315	. . . 4 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)}
18	17	eleq2i 2104	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝐴 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)})
19	18	bibi1i 217	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝜓) ↔ (𝐴 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)} ↔ 𝜓))
20	16, 19	sylibr 137	1 ⊢ ((∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝐴 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝜓))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 97   ↔ wb 98  ∀wal 1241   = wceq 1243   ∈ wcel 1393  {cab 2026  {crab 2310

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 99  ax-ia2 100  ax-ia3 101  ax-io 630  ax-5 1336  ax-7 1337  ax-gen 1338  ax-ie1 1382  ax-ie2 1383  ax-8 1395  ax-10 1396  ax-11 1397  ax-i12 1398  ax-bndl 1399  ax-4 1400  ax-17 1419  ax-i9 1423  ax-ial 1427  ax-i5r 1428  ax-ext 2022

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 110  df-tru 1246  df-nf 1350  df-sb 1646  df-clab 2027  df-cleq 2033  df-clel 2036  df-nfc 2167  df-rab 2315  df-v 2559

This theorem is referenced by:  f1oresrab  5329