Theorem bds 9971

Description: Boundedness of a formula resulting from implicit substitution in a bounded formula. Note that the proof does not use ax-bdsb 9942; therefore, using implicit instead of explicit substitution when boundedness is important, one might avoid using ax-bdsb 9942. (Contributed by BJ, 19-Nov-2019.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
bds.bd	⊢ BOUNDED 𝜑
bds.1	⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bds	⊢ BOUNDED 𝜓

Distinct variable groups:   𝜓,𝑥   𝜑,𝑦

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥)   𝜓(𝑦)

Proof of Theorem bds

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		bds.bd	. . . 4 ⊢ BOUNDED 𝜑
2	1	bdcab 9969	. . 3 ⊢ BOUNDED {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑}
3		bds.1	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
4	3	cbvabv 2161	. . 3 ⊢ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑦 ∣ 𝜓}
5	2, 4	bdceqi 9963	. 2 ⊢ BOUNDED {𝑦 ∣ 𝜓}
6	5	bdph 9970	1 ⊢ BOUNDED 𝜓

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 98  {cab 2026  BOUNDED wbd 9932

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 99  ax-ia2 100  ax-ia3 101  ax-io 630  ax-5 1336  ax-7 1337  ax-gen 1338  ax-ie1 1382  ax-ie2 1383  ax-8 1395  ax-10 1396  ax-11 1397  ax-i12 1398  ax-bndl 1399  ax-4 1400  ax-17 1419  ax-i9 1423  ax-ial 1427  ax-i5r 1428  ax-ext 2022  ax-bd0 9933  ax-bdsb 9942

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 110  df-nf 1350  df-sb 1646  df-clab 2027  df-cleq 2033  df-clel 2036  df-bdc 9961

This theorem is referenced by: (None)