Theorem rexnalim 2317

Description: Relationship between restricted universal and existential quantifiers. In classical logic this would be a biconditional. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 17-Aug-2018.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
rexnalim	⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝜑 → ¬ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)

Proof of Theorem rexnalim

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-rex 2312	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝜑))
2		exanaliim 1538	. . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝜑) → ¬ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝜑))
3		df-ral 2311	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝜑))
4	2, 3	sylnibr 602	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝜑) → ¬ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)
5	1, 4	sylbi 114	1 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝜑 → ¬ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ∧ wa 97  ∀wal 1241  ∃wex 1381   ∈ wcel 1393  ∀wral 2306  ∃wrex 2307

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 99  ax-ia2 100  ax-ia3 101  ax-in1 544  ax-in2 545  ax-5 1336  ax-gen 1338  ax-ie1 1382  ax-ie2 1383  ax-4 1400  ax-17 1419  ax-ial 1427

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 110  df-tru 1246  df-fal 1249  df-nf 1350  df-ral 2311  df-rex 2312

This theorem is referenced by:  ralexim  2318  iundif2ss  3722