ILE Home Intuitionistic Logic Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  ILE Home  >  Th. List  >  alexim Structured version   GIF version

Theorem alexim 1520
Description: One direction of theorem 19.6 of [Margaris] p. 89. The converse holds given a decidability condition, as seen at alexdc 1494. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 2-Jul-2018.)
Assertion
Ref Expression
alexim (xφ → ¬ x ¬ φ)

Proof of Theorem alexim
StepHypRef Expression
1 pm2.24 539 . . . . 5 (φ → (¬ φ → ⊥ ))
21alimi 1324 . . . 4 (xφxφ → ⊥ ))
3 exim 1474 . . . 4 (xφ → ⊥ ) → (x ¬ φx ⊥ ))
42, 3syl 14 . . 3 (xφ → (x ¬ φx ⊥ ))
5 nfv 1403 . . . 4 x
6519.9 1519 . . 3 (x ⊥ ↔ ⊥ )
74, 6syl6ib 150 . 2 (xφ → (x ¬ φ → ⊥ ))
8 dfnot 1247 . 2 x ¬ φ ↔ (x ¬ φ → ⊥ ))
97, 8sylibr 137 1 (xφ → ¬ x ¬ φ)
Colors of variables: wff set class
Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3  wi 4  wal 1226  wfal 1233  wex 1363
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 99  ax-ia2 100  ax-ia3 101  ax-in1 532  ax-in2 533  ax-5 1316  ax-gen 1318  ax-ie1 1364  ax-ie2 1365  ax-4 1382  ax-17 1401  ax-ial 1410
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 110  df-tru 1231  df-fal 1234  df-nf 1330
This theorem is referenced by:  exnalim  1521  exists2  1980
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator