Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > sotrieq | Structured version Visualization version GIF version |
Description: Trichotomy law for strict order relation. (Contributed by NM, 9-Apr-1996.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 25-Jul-2011.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
sotrieq | ⊢ ((𝑅 Or 𝐴 ∧ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴)) → (𝐵 = 𝐶 ↔ ¬ (𝐵𝑅𝐶 ∨ 𝐶𝑅𝐵))) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | sonr 4980 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑅 Or 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → ¬ 𝐵𝑅𝐵) | |
2 | 1 | adantrr 749 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑅 Or 𝐴 ∧ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴)) → ¬ 𝐵𝑅𝐵) |
3 | pm1.2 534 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐵𝑅𝐵 ∨ 𝐵𝑅𝐵) → 𝐵𝑅𝐵) | |
4 | 2, 3 | nsyl 134 | . . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑅 Or 𝐴 ∧ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴)) → ¬ (𝐵𝑅𝐵 ∨ 𝐵𝑅𝐵)) |
5 | breq2 4587 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐵 = 𝐶 → (𝐵𝑅𝐵 ↔ 𝐵𝑅𝐶)) | |
6 | breq1 4586 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐵 = 𝐶 → (𝐵𝑅𝐵 ↔ 𝐶𝑅𝐵)) | |
7 | 5, 6 | orbi12d 742 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐵 = 𝐶 → ((𝐵𝑅𝐵 ∨ 𝐵𝑅𝐵) ↔ (𝐵𝑅𝐶 ∨ 𝐶𝑅𝐵))) |
8 | 7 | notbid 307 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐵 = 𝐶 → (¬ (𝐵𝑅𝐵 ∨ 𝐵𝑅𝐵) ↔ ¬ (𝐵𝑅𝐶 ∨ 𝐶𝑅𝐵))) |
9 | 4, 8 | syl5ibcom 234 | . . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑅 Or 𝐴 ∧ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴)) → (𝐵 = 𝐶 → ¬ (𝐵𝑅𝐶 ∨ 𝐶𝑅𝐵))) |
10 | 9 | con2d 128 | . . 3 ⊢ ((𝑅 Or 𝐴 ∧ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴)) → ((𝐵𝑅𝐶 ∨ 𝐶𝑅𝐵) → ¬ 𝐵 = 𝐶)) |
11 | solin 4982 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑅 Or 𝐴 ∧ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴)) → (𝐵𝑅𝐶 ∨ 𝐵 = 𝐶 ∨ 𝐶𝑅𝐵)) | |
12 | 3orass 1034 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐵𝑅𝐶 ∨ 𝐵 = 𝐶 ∨ 𝐶𝑅𝐵) ↔ (𝐵𝑅𝐶 ∨ (𝐵 = 𝐶 ∨ 𝐶𝑅𝐵))) | |
13 | 11, 12 | sylib 207 | . . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑅 Or 𝐴 ∧ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴)) → (𝐵𝑅𝐶 ∨ (𝐵 = 𝐶 ∨ 𝐶𝑅𝐵))) |
14 | or12 544 | . . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐵𝑅𝐶 ∨ (𝐵 = 𝐶 ∨ 𝐶𝑅𝐵)) ↔ (𝐵 = 𝐶 ∨ (𝐵𝑅𝐶 ∨ 𝐶𝑅𝐵))) | |
15 | 13, 14 | sylib 207 | . . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑅 Or 𝐴 ∧ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴)) → (𝐵 = 𝐶 ∨ (𝐵𝑅𝐶 ∨ 𝐶𝑅𝐵))) |
16 | 15 | ord 391 | . . 3 ⊢ ((𝑅 Or 𝐴 ∧ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴)) → (¬ 𝐵 = 𝐶 → (𝐵𝑅𝐶 ∨ 𝐶𝑅𝐵))) |
17 | 10, 16 | impbid 201 | . 2 ⊢ ((𝑅 Or 𝐴 ∧ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴)) → ((𝐵𝑅𝐶 ∨ 𝐶𝑅𝐵) ↔ ¬ 𝐵 = 𝐶)) |
18 | 17 | con2bid 343 | 1 ⊢ ((𝑅 Or 𝐴 ∧ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴)) → (𝐵 = 𝐶 ↔ ¬ (𝐵𝑅𝐶 ∨ 𝐶𝑅𝐵))) |
Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
Syntax hints: ¬ wn 3 → wi 4 ↔ wb 195 ∨ wo 382 ∧ wa 383 ∨ w3o 1030 = wceq 1475 ∈ wcel 1977 class class class wbr 4583 Or wor 4958 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1713 ax-4 1728 ax-5 1827 ax-6 1875 ax-7 1922 ax-10 2006 ax-11 2021 ax-12 2034 ax-13 2234 ax-ext 2590 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 196 df-or 384 df-an 385 df-3or 1032 df-3an 1033 df-tru 1478 df-ex 1696 df-nf 1701 df-sb 1868 df-clab 2597 df-cleq 2603 df-clel 2606 df-nfc 2740 df-ral 2901 df-rab 2905 df-v 3175 df-dif 3543 df-un 3545 df-in 3547 df-ss 3554 df-nul 3875 df-if 4037 df-sn 4126 df-pr 4128 df-op 4132 df-br 4584 df-po 4959 df-so 4960 |
This theorem is referenced by: sotrieq2 4987 sossfld 5499 soisores 6477 soisoi 6478 weniso 6504 wemapsolem 8338 distrlem4pr 9727 addcanpr 9747 sqgt0sr 9806 lttri2 9999 xrlttri2 11851 xrltne 11870 soseq 30995 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |