Theorem canth 6508

Description: No set 𝐴 is equinumerous to its power set (Cantor's theorem), i.e. no function can map 𝐴 it onto its power set. Compare Theorem 6B(b) of [Enderton] p. 132. For the equinumerosity version, see canth2 7998. Note that 𝐴 must be a set: this theorem does not hold when 𝐴 is too large to be a set; see ncanth 6509 for a counterexample. (Use nex 1722 if you want the form ¬ ∃𝑓𝑓:𝐴–onto→𝒫 𝐴.) (Contributed by NM, 7-Aug-1994.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 7-Jun-2016.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
canth.1	⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V

Assertion

Ref	Expression
canth	⊢ ¬ 𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝒫 𝐴

Proof of Theorem canth

Dummy variables 𝑥 𝑦 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ssrab2 3650	. . . 4 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥)} ⊆ 𝐴
2		canth.1	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V
3	2	elpw2 4755	. . . 4 ⊢ ({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥)} ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 ↔ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥)} ⊆ 𝐴)
4	1, 3	mpbir 220	. . 3 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥)} ∈ 𝒫 𝐴
5		forn 6031	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝒫 𝐴 → ran 𝐹 = 𝒫 𝐴)
6	4, 5	syl5eleqr 2695	. 2 ⊢ (𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝒫 𝐴 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥)} ∈ ran 𝐹)
7		id 22	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝑥 = 𝑦)
8		fveq2 6103	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝐹‘𝑥) = (𝐹‘𝑦))
9	7, 8	eleq12d 2682	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑥 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥) ↔ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑦)))
10	9	notbid 307	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (¬ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥) ↔ ¬ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑦)))
11	10	elrab 3331	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥)} ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑦)))
12	11	baibr 943	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 → (¬ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑦) ↔ 𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥)}))
13		nbbn 372	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((¬ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑦) ↔ 𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥)}) ↔ ¬ (𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑦) ↔ 𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥)}))
14	12, 13	sylib 207	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 → ¬ (𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑦) ↔ 𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥)}))
15		eleq2 2677	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐹‘𝑦) = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥)} → (𝑦 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑦) ↔ 𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥)}))
16	14, 15	nsyl 134	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 → ¬ (𝐹‘𝑦) = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥)})
17	16	nrex 2983	. . 3 ⊢ ¬ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐹‘𝑦) = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥)}
18		fofn 6030	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝒫 𝐴 → 𝐹 Fn 𝐴)
19		fvelrnb 6153	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐹 Fn 𝐴 → ({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥)} ∈ ran 𝐹 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐹‘𝑦) = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥)}))
20	18, 19	syl 17	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝒫 𝐴 → ({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥)} ∈ ran 𝐹 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐹‘𝑦) = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥)}))
21	17, 20	mtbiri 316	. 2 ⊢ (𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝒫 𝐴 → ¬ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥)} ∈ ran 𝐹)
22	6, 21	pm2.65i 184	1 ⊢ ¬ 𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝒫 𝐴

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   ↔ wb 195   = wceq 1475   ∈ wcel 1977  ∃wrex 2897  {crab 2900  Vcvv 3173   ⊆ wss 3540  𝒫 cpw 4108  ran crn 5039   Fn wfn 5799  –onto→wfo 5802  ‘cfv 5804

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1713  ax-4 1728  ax-5 1827  ax-6 1875  ax-7 1922  ax-9 1986  ax-10 2006  ax-11 2021  ax-12 2034  ax-13 2234  ax-ext 2590  ax-sep 4709  ax-nul 4717  ax-pr 4833

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 196  df-or 384  df-an 385  df-3an 1033  df-tru 1478  df-ex 1696  df-nf 1701  df-sb 1868  df-eu 2462  df-mo 2463  df-clab 2597  df-cleq 2603  df-clel 2606  df-nfc 2740  df-ral 2901  df-rex 2902  df-rab 2905  df-v 3175  df-sbc 3403  df-dif 3543  df-un 3545  df-in 3547  df-ss 3554  df-nul 3875  df-if 4037  df-pw 4110  df-sn 4126  df-pr 4128  df-op 4132  df-uni 4373  df-br 4584  df-opab 4644  df-mpt 4645  df-id 4953  df-xp 5044  df-rel 5045  df-cnv 5046  df-co 5047  df-dm 5048  df-rn 5049  df-iota 5768  df-fun 5806  df-fn 5807  df-f 5808  df-fo 5810  df-fv 5812

This theorem is referenced by:  canth2  7998  canthwdom  8367