Theorem axpr 4832

Description: Unabbreviated version of the Axiom of Pairing of ZF set theory, derived as a theorem from the other axioms.

This theorem should not be referenced by any proof. Instead, use ax-pr 4833 below so that the uses of the Axiom of Pairing can be more easily identified. (Contributed by NM, 14-Nov-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
axpr	⊢ ∃𝑧∀𝑤((𝑤 = 𝑥 ∨ 𝑤 = 𝑦) → 𝑤 ∈ 𝑧)

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑧,𝑤   𝑦,𝑧,𝑤

Proof of Theorem axpr

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		zfpair 4831	. . 3 ⊢ {𝑥, 𝑦} ∈ V
2	1	isseti 3182	. 2 ⊢ ∃𝑧 𝑧 = {𝑥, 𝑦}
3		dfcleq 2604	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑧 = {𝑥, 𝑦} ↔ ∀𝑤(𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 ↔ 𝑤 ∈ {𝑥, 𝑦}))
4		vex 3176	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ 𝑤 ∈ V
5	4	elpr 4146	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑤 ∈ {𝑥, 𝑦} ↔ (𝑤 = 𝑥 ∨ 𝑤 = 𝑦))
6	5	bibi2i 326	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 ↔ 𝑤 ∈ {𝑥, 𝑦}) ↔ (𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 ↔ (𝑤 = 𝑥 ∨ 𝑤 = 𝑦)))
7		biimpr 209	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 ↔ (𝑤 = 𝑥 ∨ 𝑤 = 𝑦)) → ((𝑤 = 𝑥 ∨ 𝑤 = 𝑦) → 𝑤 ∈ 𝑧))
8	6, 7	sylbi 206	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 ↔ 𝑤 ∈ {𝑥, 𝑦}) → ((𝑤 = 𝑥 ∨ 𝑤 = 𝑦) → 𝑤 ∈ 𝑧))
9	8	alimi 1730	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑤(𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 ↔ 𝑤 ∈ {𝑥, 𝑦}) → ∀𝑤((𝑤 = 𝑥 ∨ 𝑤 = 𝑦) → 𝑤 ∈ 𝑧))
10	3, 9	sylbi 206	. 2 ⊢ (𝑧 = {𝑥, 𝑦} → ∀𝑤((𝑤 = 𝑥 ∨ 𝑤 = 𝑦) → 𝑤 ∈ 𝑧))
11	2, 10	eximii 1754	1 ⊢ ∃𝑧∀𝑤((𝑤 = 𝑥 ∨ 𝑤 = 𝑦) → 𝑤 ∈ 𝑧)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 195   ∨ wo 382  ∀wal 1473   = wceq 1475  ∃wex 1695   ∈ wcel 1977  {cpr 4127

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1713  ax-4 1728  ax-5 1827  ax-6 1875  ax-7 1922  ax-9 1986  ax-10 2006  ax-11 2021  ax-12 2034  ax-13 2234  ax-ext 2590  ax-rep 4699  ax-sep 4709  ax-nul 4717  ax-pow 4769

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 196  df-or 384  df-an 385  df-3an 1033  df-tru 1478  df-ex 1696  df-nf 1701  df-sb 1868  df-clab 2597  df-cleq 2603  df-clel 2606  df-nfc 2740  df-ne 2782  df-v 3175  df-dif 3543  df-un 3545  df-in 3547  df-ss 3554  df-nul 3875  df-pw 4110  df-sn 4126  df-pr 4128

This theorem is referenced by: (None)