Theorem axnulALT 4715

Description: Alternate proof of axnul 4716, proved directly from ax-rep 4699 using none of the equality axioms ax-7 1922 through ax-c14 33194 provided we accept sp 2041 as an axiom. Replace sp 2041 with the obsolete ax-c5 33186 to see this in 'show trace_back'. (Contributed by Jeff Hoffman, 3-Feb-2008.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2016.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
axnulALT	⊢ ∃𝑥∀𝑦 ¬ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝑦

Proof of Theorem axnulALT

Dummy variables 𝑧 𝑤 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ax-rep 4699	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑤∃𝑥∀𝑦(∀𝑥⊥ → 𝑦 = 𝑥) → ∃𝑥∀𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ↔ ∃𝑤(𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ ∀𝑥⊥)))
2		sp 2041	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ¬ ∀𝑦(∀𝑥⊥ → 𝑦 = 𝑥) → ¬ ∀𝑦(∀𝑥⊥ → 𝑦 = 𝑥))
3	2	con2i 133	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∀𝑦(∀𝑥⊥ → 𝑦 = 𝑥) → ¬ ∀𝑥 ¬ ∀𝑦(∀𝑥⊥ → 𝑦 = 𝑥))
4		df-ex 1696	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∃𝑥∀𝑦(∀𝑥⊥ → 𝑦 = 𝑥) ↔ ¬ ∀𝑥 ¬ ∀𝑦(∀𝑥⊥ → 𝑦 = 𝑥))
5	3, 4	sylibr 223	. . . 4 ⊢ (∀𝑦(∀𝑥⊥ → 𝑦 = 𝑥) → ∃𝑥∀𝑦(∀𝑥⊥ → 𝑦 = 𝑥))
6		fal 1482	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ¬ ⊥
7		sp 2041	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (∀𝑥⊥ → ⊥)
8	6, 7	mto 187	. . . . 5 ⊢ ¬ ∀𝑥⊥
9	8	pm2.21i 115	. . . 4 ⊢ (∀𝑥⊥ → 𝑦 = 𝑥)
10	5, 9	mpg 1715	. . 3 ⊢ ∃𝑥∀𝑦(∀𝑥⊥ → 𝑦 = 𝑥)
11	1, 10	mpg 1715	. 2 ⊢ ∃𝑥∀𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ↔ ∃𝑤(𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ ∀𝑥⊥))
12	8	intnan 951	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ¬ (𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ ∀𝑥⊥)
13	12	nex 1722	. . . . 5 ⊢ ¬ ∃𝑤(𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ ∀𝑥⊥)
14	13	nbn 361	. . . 4 ⊢ (¬ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ↔ ∃𝑤(𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ ∀𝑥⊥)))
15	14	albii 1737	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑦 ¬ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ↔ ∀𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ↔ ∃𝑤(𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ ∀𝑥⊥)))
16	15	exbii 1764	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥∀𝑦 ¬ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ↔ ∃𝑥∀𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ↔ ∃𝑤(𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 ∧ ∀𝑥⊥)))
17	11, 16	mpbir 220	1 ⊢ ∃𝑥∀𝑦 ¬ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ↔ wb 195   ∧ wa 383  ∀wal 1473   = wceq 1475  ⊥wfal 1480  ∃wex 1695   ∈ wcel 1977

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1713  ax-4 1728  ax-5 1827  ax-6 1875  ax-7 1922  ax-12 2034  ax-rep 4699

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 196  df-an 385  df-tru 1478  df-fal 1481  df-ex 1696

This theorem is referenced by: (None)