Theorem unrab 3208

Description: Union of two restricted class abstractions. (Contributed by NM, 25-Mar-2004.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
unrab	⊢ ({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ∪ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓}) = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓)}

Proof of Theorem unrab

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-rab 2315	. . 3 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)}
2		df-rab 2315	. . 3 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓)}
3	1, 2	uneq12i 3095	. 2 ⊢ ({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ∪ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓}) = ({𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} ∪ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓)})
4		df-rab 2315	. . 3 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓)} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓))}
5		unab 3204	. . . 4 ⊢ ({𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} ∪ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓)}) = {𝑥 ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ∨ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓))}
6		andi 731	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓)) ↔ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ∨ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓)))
7	6	abbii 2153	. . . 4 ⊢ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓))} = {𝑥 ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ∨ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓))}
8	5, 7	eqtr4i 2063	. . 3 ⊢ ({𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} ∪ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓)}) = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓))}
9	4, 8	eqtr4i 2063	. 2 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓)} = ({𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} ∪ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓)})
10	3, 9	eqtr4i 2063	1 ⊢ ({𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ∪ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓}) = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓)}

Syntax hints:   ∧ wa 97   ∨ wo 629   = wceq 1243   ∈ wcel 1393  {cab 2026  {crab 2310   ∪ cun 2915

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 99  ax-ia2 100  ax-ia3 101  ax-io 630  ax-5 1336  ax-7 1337  ax-gen 1338  ax-ie1 1382  ax-ie2 1383  ax-8 1395  ax-10 1396  ax-11 1397  ax-i12 1398  ax-bndl 1399  ax-4 1400  ax-17 1419  ax-i9 1423  ax-ial 1427  ax-i5r 1428  ax-ext 2022

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 110  df-tru 1246  df-nf 1350  df-sb 1646  df-clab 2027  df-cleq 2033  df-clel 2036  df-nfc 2167  df-rab 2315  df-v 2559  df-un 2922

This theorem is referenced by:  rabxmdc  3249