Intuitionistic Logic Explorer < Previous   Next > Nearby theorems Mirrors  >  Home  >  ILE Home  >  Th. List  >  unrab GIF version

Theorem unrab 3208
 Description: Union of two restricted class abstractions. (Contributed by NM, 25-Mar-2004.)
Assertion
Ref Expression
unrab ({𝑥𝐴𝜑} ∪ {𝑥𝐴𝜓}) = {𝑥𝐴 ∣ (𝜑𝜓)}

Proof of Theorem unrab
StepHypRef Expression
1 df-rab 2315 . . 3 {𝑥𝐴𝜑} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥𝐴𝜑)}
2 df-rab 2315 . . 3 {𝑥𝐴𝜓} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥𝐴𝜓)}
31, 2uneq12i 3095 . 2 ({𝑥𝐴𝜑} ∪ {𝑥𝐴𝜓}) = ({𝑥 ∣ (𝑥𝐴𝜑)} ∪ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥𝐴𝜓)})
4 df-rab 2315 . . 3 {𝑥𝐴 ∣ (𝜑𝜓)} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥𝐴 ∧ (𝜑𝜓))}
5 unab 3204 . . . 4 ({𝑥 ∣ (𝑥𝐴𝜑)} ∪ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥𝐴𝜓)}) = {𝑥 ∣ ((𝑥𝐴𝜑) ∨ (𝑥𝐴𝜓))}
6 andi 731 . . . . 5 ((𝑥𝐴 ∧ (𝜑𝜓)) ↔ ((𝑥𝐴𝜑) ∨ (𝑥𝐴𝜓)))
76abbii 2153 . . . 4 {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥𝐴 ∧ (𝜑𝜓))} = {𝑥 ∣ ((𝑥𝐴𝜑) ∨ (𝑥𝐴𝜓))}
85, 7eqtr4i 2063 . . 3 ({𝑥 ∣ (𝑥𝐴𝜑)} ∪ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥𝐴𝜓)}) = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥𝐴 ∧ (𝜑𝜓))}
94, 8eqtr4i 2063 . 2 {𝑥𝐴 ∣ (𝜑𝜓)} = ({𝑥 ∣ (𝑥𝐴𝜑)} ∪ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥𝐴𝜓)})
103, 9eqtr4i 2063 1 ({𝑥𝐴𝜑} ∪ {𝑥𝐴𝜓}) = {𝑥𝐴 ∣ (𝜑𝜓)}
 Colors of variables: wff set class Syntax hints:   ∧ wa 97   ∨ wo 629   = wceq 1243   ∈ wcel 1393  {cab 2026  {crab 2310   ∪ cun 2915 This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 99  ax-ia2 100  ax-ia3 101  ax-io 630  ax-5 1336  ax-7 1337  ax-gen 1338  ax-ie1 1382  ax-ie2 1383  ax-8 1395  ax-10 1396  ax-11 1397  ax-i12 1398  ax-bndl 1399  ax-4 1400  ax-17 1419  ax-i9 1423  ax-ial 1427  ax-i5r 1428  ax-ext 2022 This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 110  df-tru 1246  df-nf 1350  df-sb 1646  df-clab 2027  df-cleq 2033  df-clel 2036  df-nfc 2167  df-rab 2315  df-v 2559  df-un 2922 This theorem is referenced by:  rabxmdc  3249
 Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator