Theorem undif3ss 3198

Description: A subset relationship involving class union and class difference. In classical logic, this would be equality rather than subset, as in the first equality of Exercise 13 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 22. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 28-Jul-2018.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
undif3ss	⊢ (𝐴 ∪ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐶)) ⊆ ((𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∖ (𝐶 ∖ 𝐴))

Proof of Theorem undif3ss

Dummy variable 𝑥 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		elun 3084	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∪ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐶)) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐶)))
2		eldif 2927	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐶) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶))
3	2	orbi2i 679	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐶)) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶)))
4		orc 633	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))
5		olc 632	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → (¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴))
6	4, 5	jca 290	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)))
7		olc 632	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))
8		orc 633	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 → (¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴))
9	7, 8	anim12i 321	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶) → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)))
10	6, 9	jaoi 636	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶)) → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)))
11		simpl 102	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)
12	11	orcd 652	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶)))
13		olc 632	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶)))
14		orc 633	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶)))
15	14	adantr 261	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶)))
16	14	adantl 262	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶)))
17	12, 13, 15, 16	ccase 871	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶)))
18	10, 17	impbii 117	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶)) ↔ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)))
19	1, 3, 18	3bitri 195	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∪ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐶)) ↔ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)))
20		elun 3084	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))
21	20	biimpri 124	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵))
22		pm4.53r 804	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → ¬ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴))
23		eldif 2927	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐶 ∖ 𝐴) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴))
24	22, 23	sylnibr 602	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → ¬ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐶 ∖ 𝐴))
25	21, 24	anim12i 321	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)) → (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐶 ∖ 𝐴)))
26		eldif 2927	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ((𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∖ (𝐶 ∖ 𝐴)) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐶 ∖ 𝐴)))
27	25, 26	sylibr 137	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)) → 𝑥 ∈ ((𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∖ (𝐶 ∖ 𝐴)))
28	19, 27	sylbi 114	. 2 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∪ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐶)) → 𝑥 ∈ ((𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∖ (𝐶 ∖ 𝐴)))
29	28	ssriv 2949	1 ⊢ (𝐴 ∪ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐶)) ⊆ ((𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∖ (𝐶 ∖ 𝐴))

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   ∧ wa 97   ∨ wo 629   ∈ wcel 1393   ∖ cdif 2914   ∪ cun 2915   ⊆ wss 2917

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 99  ax-ia2 100  ax-ia3 101  ax-in1 544  ax-in2 545  ax-io 630  ax-5 1336  ax-7 1337  ax-gen 1338  ax-ie1 1382  ax-ie2 1383  ax-8 1395  ax-10 1396  ax-11 1397  ax-i12 1398  ax-bndl 1399  ax-4 1400  ax-17 1419  ax-i9 1423  ax-ial 1427  ax-i5r 1428  ax-ext 2022

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 110  df-tru 1246  df-nf 1350  df-sb 1646  df-clab 2027  df-cleq 2033  df-clel 2036  df-nfc 2167  df-v 2559  df-dif 2920  df-un 2922  df-in 2924  df-ss 2931

This theorem is referenced by: (None)