Theorem setindft 10090

Description: Axiom of set-induction with a DV condition replaced with a non-freeness hypothesis (Contributed by BJ, 22-Nov-2019.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
setindft	⊢ (∀𝑥Ⅎ𝑦𝜑 → (∀𝑥(∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → 𝜑) → ∀𝑥𝜑))

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝑦

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦)

Proof of Theorem setindft

Dummy variable 𝑧 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		nfa1 1434	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥∀𝑥Ⅎ𝑦𝜑
2		nfv 1421	. . . . . 6 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧∀𝑥Ⅎ𝑦𝜑
3		nfnf1 1436	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦Ⅎ𝑦𝜑
4	3	nfal 1468	. . . . . 6 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦∀𝑥Ⅎ𝑦𝜑
5		nfsbt 1850	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (∀𝑥Ⅎ𝑦𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑦[𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑)
6		nfv 1421	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧[𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑
7	6	a1i 9	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (∀𝑥Ⅎ𝑦𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑧[𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑)
8		sbequ 1721	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑦 → ([𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑))
9	8	a1i 9	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (∀𝑥Ⅎ𝑦𝜑 → (𝑧 = 𝑦 → ([𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑)))
10	2, 4, 5, 7, 9	cbvrald 9927	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∀𝑥Ⅎ𝑦𝜑 → (∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 [𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑))
11	10	biimpd 132	. . . 4 ⊢ (∀𝑥Ⅎ𝑦𝜑 → (∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 [𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑 → ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑))
12	11	imim1d 69	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥Ⅎ𝑦𝜑 → ((∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → 𝜑) → (∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 [𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑 → 𝜑)))
13	1, 12	alimd 1414	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥Ⅎ𝑦𝜑 → (∀𝑥(∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → 𝜑) → ∀𝑥(∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 [𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑 → 𝜑)))
14		ax-setind 4262	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥(∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 [𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑 → 𝜑) → ∀𝑥𝜑)
15	13, 14	syl6 29	1 ⊢ (∀𝑥Ⅎ𝑦𝜑 → (∀𝑥(∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → 𝜑) → ∀𝑥𝜑))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 98  ∀wal 1241  Ⅎwnf 1349  [wsb 1645  ∀wral 2306

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 99  ax-ia2 100  ax-ia3 101  ax-io 630  ax-5 1336  ax-7 1337  ax-gen 1338  ax-ie1 1382  ax-ie2 1383  ax-8 1395  ax-10 1396  ax-11 1397  ax-i12 1398  ax-bndl 1399  ax-4 1400  ax-17 1419  ax-i9 1423  ax-ial 1427  ax-i5r 1428  ax-ext 2022  ax-setind 4262

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 110  df-nf 1350  df-sb 1646  df-cleq 2033  df-clel 2036  df-ral 2311

This theorem is referenced by:  setindf  10091