Theorem sb7f 1868

Description: This version of dfsb7 1867 does not require that 𝜑 and 𝑧 be distinct. This permits it to be used as a definition for substitution in a formalization that omits the logically redundant axiom ax-17 1419 i.e. that doesn't have the concept of a variable not occurring in a wff. (df-sb 1646 is also suitable, but its mixing of free and bound variables is distasteful to some logicians.) (Contributed by NM, 26-Jul-2006.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 25-May-2011.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
sb7f.1	⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑧𝜑)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
sb7f	⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑧(𝑧 = 𝑦 ∧ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝜑)))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑧   𝑦,𝑧

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦,𝑧)

Proof of Theorem sb7f

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		sb5 1767	. . 3 ⊢ ([𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝜑))
2	1	sbbii 1648	. 2 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑧][𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑧]∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝜑))
3		sb7f.1	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑧𝜑)
4	3	sbco2v 1821	. 2 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑧][𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑)
5		sb5 1767	. 2 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑧]∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑧(𝑧 = 𝑦 ∧ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝜑)))
6	2, 4, 5	3bitr3i 199	1 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑧(𝑧 = 𝑦 ∧ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑧 ∧ 𝜑)))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 97   ↔ wb 98  ∀wal 1241  ∃wex 1381  [wsb 1645

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 99  ax-ia2 100  ax-ia3 101  ax-io 630  ax-5 1336  ax-7 1337  ax-gen 1338  ax-ie1 1382  ax-ie2 1383  ax-8 1395  ax-10 1396  ax-11 1397  ax-i12 1398  ax-4 1400  ax-17 1419  ax-i9 1423  ax-ial 1427  ax-i5r 1428

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 110  df-nf 1350  df-sb 1646

This theorem is referenced by: (None)