Theorem rspc2ev 2664

Description: 2-variable restricted existential specialization, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 16-Oct-1999.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
rspc2v.1	⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))
rspc2v.2	⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜓))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
rspc2ev	⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝜓) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 𝜑)

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑦,𝐴   𝑦,𝐵   𝑥,𝐶   𝑥,𝐷,𝑦   𝜒,𝑥   𝜓,𝑦

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦)   𝜓(𝑥)   𝜒(𝑦)   𝐵(𝑥)   𝐶(𝑦)

Proof of Theorem rspc2ev

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		rspc2v.2	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜓))
2	1	rspcev 2656	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝜓) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 𝜒)
3	2	anim2i 324	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝜓)) → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 𝜒))
4	3	3impb 1100	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 𝜒))
5		rspc2v.1	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))
6	5	rexbidv 2327	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 𝜒))
7	6	rspcev 2656	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 𝜒) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 𝜑)
8	4, 7	syl 14	1 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝜓) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 𝜑)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 97   ↔ wb 98   ∧ w3a 885   = wceq 1243   ∈ wcel 1393  ∃wrex 2307

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 99  ax-ia2 100  ax-ia3 101  ax-io 630  ax-5 1336  ax-7 1337  ax-gen 1338  ax-ie1 1382  ax-ie2 1383  ax-8 1395  ax-10 1396  ax-11 1397  ax-i12 1398  ax-bndl 1399  ax-4 1400  ax-17 1419  ax-i9 1423  ax-ial 1427  ax-i5r 1428  ax-ext 2022

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 110  df-3an 887  df-tru 1246  df-nf 1350  df-sb 1646  df-clab 2027  df-cleq 2033  df-clel 2036  df-nfc 2167  df-rex 2312  df-v 2559

This theorem is referenced by:  rspc3ev  2666  opelxp  4374  rspceov  5547  2dom  6285  apreim  7594  addcn2  9831  mulcn2  9833