Intuitionistic Logic Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
Mirrors > Home > ILE Home > Th. List > rexss | GIF version |
Description: Restricted existential quantification on a subset in terms of superset. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 3-Apr-2015.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
rexss | ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑))) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | ssel 2939 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)) | |
2 | 1 | pm4.71rd 374 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴))) |
3 | 2 | anbi1d 438 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝜑))) |
4 | anass 381 | . . 3 ⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑))) | |
5 | 3, 4 | syl6bb 185 | . 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)))) |
6 | 5 | rexbidv2 2329 | 1 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑))) |
Colors of variables: wff set class |
Syntax hints: → wi 4 ∧ wa 97 ↔ wb 98 ∈ wcel 1393 ∃wrex 2307 ⊆ wss 2917 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-1 5 ax-2 6 ax-mp 7 ax-ia1 99 ax-ia2 100 ax-ia3 101 ax-5 1336 ax-7 1337 ax-gen 1338 ax-ie1 1382 ax-ie2 1383 ax-8 1395 ax-11 1397 ax-4 1400 ax-17 1419 ax-i9 1423 ax-ial 1427 ax-i5r 1428 ax-ext 2022 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 110 df-nf 1350 df-sb 1646 df-clab 2027 df-cleq 2033 df-clel 2036 df-rex 2312 df-in 2924 df-ss 2931 |
This theorem is referenced by: 1idprl 6688 1idpru 6689 ltexprlemm 6698 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |