| Intuitionistic Logic Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
| Mirrors > Home > ILE Home > Th. List > rexdifsn | GIF version | ||
| Description: Restricted existential quantification over a set with an element removed. (Contributed by NM, 4-Feb-2015.) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| rexdifsn | ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ {𝐵})𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | eldifsn 3495 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ {𝐵}) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ≠ 𝐵)) | |
| 2 | 1 | anbi1i 431 | . . 3 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ {𝐵}) ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ≠ 𝐵) ∧ 𝜑)) |
| 3 | anass 381 | . . 3 ⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ≠ 𝐵) ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑥 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑))) | |
| 4 | 2, 3 | bitri 173 | . 2 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ {𝐵}) ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑥 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑))) |
| 5 | 4 | rexbii2 2335 | 1 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ {𝐵})𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)) |
| Colors of variables: wff set class |
| Syntax hints: ∧ wa 97 ↔ wb 98 ∈ wcel 1393 ≠ wne 2204 ∃wrex 2307 ∖ cdif 2914 {csn 3375 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-1 5 ax-2 6 ax-mp 7 ax-ia1 99 ax-ia2 100 ax-ia3 101 ax-in1 544 ax-in2 545 ax-io 630 ax-5 1336 ax-7 1337 ax-gen 1338 ax-ie1 1382 ax-ie2 1383 ax-8 1395 ax-10 1396 ax-11 1397 ax-i12 1398 ax-bndl 1399 ax-4 1400 ax-17 1419 ax-i9 1423 ax-ial 1427 ax-i5r 1428 ax-ext 2022 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 110 df-tru 1246 df-nf 1350 df-sb 1646 df-clab 2027 df-cleq 2033 df-clel 2036 df-nfc 2167 df-ne 2206 df-rex 2312 df-v 2559 df-dif 2920 df-sn 3381 |
| This theorem is referenced by: (None) |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |