Intuitionistic Logic Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
Mirrors > Home > ILE Home > Th. List > ralcomf | GIF version |
Description: Commutation of restricted quantifiers. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Oct-2016.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
ralcomf.1 | ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴 |
ralcomf.2 | ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵 |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
ralcomf | ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | ancomsimp 1329 | . . . 4 ⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝜑) ↔ ((𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝜑)) | |
2 | 1 | 2albii 1360 | . . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝜑) ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦((𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝜑)) |
3 | alcom 1367 | . . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦((𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝜑) ↔ ∀𝑦∀𝑥((𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝜑)) | |
4 | 2, 3 | bitri 173 | . 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝜑) ↔ ∀𝑦∀𝑥((𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝜑)) |
5 | ralcomf.1 | . . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴 | |
6 | 5 | r2alf 2341 | . 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝜑)) |
7 | ralcomf.2 | . . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵 | |
8 | 7 | r2alf 2341 | . 2 ⊢ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑦∀𝑥((𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝜑)) |
9 | 4, 6, 8 | 3bitr4i 201 | 1 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑) |
Colors of variables: wff set class |
Syntax hints: → wi 4 ∧ wa 97 ↔ wb 98 ∀wal 1241 ∈ wcel 1393 Ⅎwnfc 2165 ∀wral 2306 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-1 5 ax-2 6 ax-mp 7 ax-ia1 99 ax-ia2 100 ax-ia3 101 ax-io 630 ax-5 1336 ax-7 1337 ax-gen 1338 ax-ie1 1382 ax-ie2 1383 ax-8 1395 ax-10 1396 ax-11 1397 ax-i12 1398 ax-bndl 1399 ax-4 1400 ax-17 1419 ax-i9 1423 ax-ial 1427 ax-i5r 1428 ax-ext 2022 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 110 df-nf 1350 df-sb 1646 df-cleq 2033 df-clel 2036 df-nfc 2167 df-ral 2311 |
This theorem is referenced by: ralcom 2473 ssiinf 3706 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |