Theorem rabss2 3023

Description: Subclass law for restricted abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 18-Dec-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 26-Jun-2011.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
rabss2	⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑})

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴   𝑥,𝐵

Allowed substitution hint:   𝜑(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem rabss2

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		pm3.45 529	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)))
2	1	alimi 1344	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) → ∀𝑥((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)))
3		dfss2 2934	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))
4		ss2ab 3008	. . 3 ⊢ ({𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} ⊆ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)} ↔ ∀𝑥((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)))
5	2, 3, 4	3imtr4i 190	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} ⊆ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)})
6		df-rab 2315	. 2 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)}
7		df-rab 2315	. 2 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)}
8	5, 6, 7	3sstr4g 2986	1 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑})

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 97  ∀wal 1241   ∈ wcel 1393  {cab 2026  {crab 2310   ⊆ wss 2917

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 99  ax-ia2 100  ax-ia3 101  ax-io 630  ax-5 1336  ax-7 1337  ax-gen 1338  ax-ie1 1382  ax-ie2 1383  ax-8 1395  ax-10 1396  ax-11 1397  ax-i12 1398  ax-bndl 1399  ax-4 1400  ax-17 1419  ax-i9 1423  ax-ial 1427  ax-i5r 1428  ax-ext 2022

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 110  df-nf 1350  df-sb 1646  df-clab 2027  df-cleq 2033  df-clel 2036  df-nfc 2167  df-rab 2315  df-in 2924  df-ss 2931

This theorem is referenced by:  sess2  4075