Intuitionistic Logic Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
Mirrors > Home > ILE Home > Th. List > rabeqf | GIF version |
Description: Equality theorem for restricted class abstractions, with bound-variable hypotheses instead of distinct variable restrictions. (Contributed by NM, 7-Mar-2004.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
rabeqf.1 | ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 |
rabeqf.2 | ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵 |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
rabeqf | ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑}) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | rabeqf.1 | . . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 | |
2 | rabeqf.2 | . . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵 | |
3 | 1, 2 | nfeq 2185 | . . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝐴 = 𝐵 |
4 | eleq2 2101 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)) | |
5 | 4 | anbi1d 438 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑))) |
6 | 3, 5 | abbid 2154 | . 2 ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)}) |
7 | df-rab 2315 | . 2 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} | |
8 | df-rab 2315 | . 2 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑)} | |
9 | 6, 7, 8 | 3eqtr4g 2097 | 1 ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 𝜑}) |
Colors of variables: wff set class |
Syntax hints: → wi 4 ∧ wa 97 = wceq 1243 ∈ wcel 1393 {cab 2026 Ⅎwnfc 2165 {crab 2310 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-1 5 ax-2 6 ax-mp 7 ax-ia1 99 ax-ia2 100 ax-ia3 101 ax-io 630 ax-5 1336 ax-7 1337 ax-gen 1338 ax-ie1 1382 ax-ie2 1383 ax-8 1395 ax-10 1396 ax-11 1397 ax-i12 1398 ax-bndl 1399 ax-4 1400 ax-17 1419 ax-i9 1423 ax-ial 1427 ax-i5r 1428 ax-ext 2022 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 110 df-tru 1246 df-nf 1350 df-sb 1646 df-clab 2027 df-cleq 2033 df-clel 2036 df-nfc 2167 df-rab 2315 |
This theorem is referenced by: rabeq 2551 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |