Theorem rabeqf 2528

Description: Equality theorem for restricted class abstractions, with bound-variable hypotheses instead of distinct variable restrictions. (Contributed by NM, 7-Mar-2004.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
rabeqf.1	⊢ ℲxA
rabeqf.2	⊢ ℲxB

Assertion

Ref	Expression
rabeqf	⊢ (A = B → {x ∈ A ∣ φ} = {x ∈ B ∣ φ})

Proof of Theorem rabeqf

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		rabeqf.1	. . . 4 ⊢ ℲxA
2		rabeqf.2	. . . 4 ⊢ ℲxB
3	1, 2	nfeq 2167	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎx A = B
4		eleq2 2083	. . . 4 ⊢ (A = B → (x ∈ A ↔ x ∈ B))
5	4	anbi1d 441	. . 3 ⊢ (A = B → ((x ∈ A ∧ φ) ↔ (x ∈ B ∧ φ)))
6	3, 5	abbid 2136	. 2 ⊢ (A = B → {x ∣ (x ∈ A ∧ φ)} = {x ∣ (x ∈ B ∧ φ)})
7		df-rab 2293	. 2 ⊢ {x ∈ A ∣ φ} = {x ∣ (x ∈ A ∧ φ)}
8		df-rab 2293	. 2 ⊢ {x ∈ B ∣ φ} = {x ∣ (x ∈ B ∧ φ)}
9	6, 7, 8	3eqtr4g 2079	1 ⊢ (A = B → {x ∈ A ∣ φ} = {x ∈ B ∣ φ})

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 97   = wceq 1228   ∈ wcel 1374  {cab 2008  Ⅎwnfc 2147  {crab 2288

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 99  ax-ia2 100  ax-ia3 101  ax-io 617  ax-5 1316  ax-7 1317  ax-gen 1318  ax-ie1 1363  ax-ie2 1364  ax-8 1376  ax-10 1377  ax-11 1378  ax-i12 1379  ax-bnd 1380  ax-4 1381  ax-17 1400  ax-i9 1404  ax-ial 1409  ax-i5r 1410  ax-ext 2004

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 110  df-tru 1231  df-nf 1330  df-sb 1628  df-clab 2009  df-cleq 2015  df-clel 2018  df-nfc 2149  df-rab 2293

This theorem is referenced by:  rabeq  2529