Intuitionistic Logic Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
Mirrors > Home > ILE Home > Th. List > pm2.5dc | GIF version |
Description: Negating an implication for a decidable antecedent. Based on theorem *2.5 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 107. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 29-Mar-2018.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
pm2.5dc | ⊢ (DECID 𝜑 → (¬ (𝜑 → 𝜓) → (¬ 𝜑 → 𝜓))) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | simplimdc 757 | . . . 4 ⊢ (DECID 𝜑 → (¬ (𝜑 → 𝜓) → 𝜑)) | |
2 | 1 | imp 115 | . . 3 ⊢ ((DECID 𝜑 ∧ ¬ (𝜑 → 𝜓)) → 𝜑) |
3 | 2 | pm2.24d 552 | . 2 ⊢ ((DECID 𝜑 ∧ ¬ (𝜑 → 𝜓)) → (¬ 𝜑 → 𝜓)) |
4 | 3 | ex 108 | 1 ⊢ (DECID 𝜑 → (¬ (𝜑 → 𝜓) → (¬ 𝜑 → 𝜓))) |
Colors of variables: wff set class |
Syntax hints: ¬ wn 3 → wi 4 ∧ wa 97 DECID wdc 742 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-1 5 ax-2 6 ax-mp 7 ax-ia1 99 ax-ia2 100 ax-ia3 101 ax-in1 544 ax-in2 545 ax-io 630 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 110 df-dc 743 |
This theorem is referenced by: pm5.11dc 815 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |