Theorem opabbid 3822

Description: Equivalent wff's yield equal ordered-pair class abstractions (deduction rule). (Contributed by NM, 21-Feb-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 9-Jul-2011.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
opabbid.1	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑
opabbid.2	⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑
opabbid.3	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
opabbid	⊢ (𝜑 → {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜓} = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜒})

Proof of Theorem opabbid

Dummy variable 𝑧 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		opabbid.1	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑
2		opabbid.2	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑
3		opabbid.3	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))
4	3	anbi2d 437	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜒)))
5	2, 4	exbid 1507	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜓) ↔ ∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜒)))
6	1, 5	exbid 1507	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜓) ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜒)))
7	6	abbidv 2155	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜓)} = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜒)})
8		df-opab 3819	. 2 ⊢ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜓} = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜓)}
9		df-opab 3819	. 2 ⊢ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜒} = {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜒)}
10	7, 8, 9	3eqtr4g 2097	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜓} = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜒})

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 97   ↔ wb 98   = wceq 1243  Ⅎwnf 1349  ∃wex 1381  {cab 2026  ⟨cop 3378  {copab 3817

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 99  ax-ia2 100  ax-ia3 101  ax-5 1336  ax-7 1337  ax-gen 1338  ax-ie1 1382  ax-ie2 1383  ax-8 1395  ax-11 1397  ax-4 1400  ax-17 1419  ax-i9 1423  ax-ial 1427  ax-i5r 1428  ax-ext 2022

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 110  df-tru 1246  df-nf 1350  df-sb 1646  df-clab 2027  df-cleq 2033  df-opab 3819

This theorem is referenced by:  opabbidv  3823  mpteq12f  3837  fnoprabg  5602