ILE Home Intuitionistic Logic Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  ILE Home  >  Th. List  >  nfoprab GIF version

Theorem nfoprab 5557
Description: Bound-variable hypothesis builder for an operation class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 22-Aug-2013.)
Hypothesis
Ref Expression
nfoprab.1 𝑤𝜑
Assertion
Ref Expression
nfoprab 𝑤{⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑}
Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑤   𝑦,𝑤   𝑧,𝑤
Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦,𝑧,𝑤)

Proof of Theorem nfoprab
Dummy variable 𝑣 is distinct from all other variables.
StepHypRef Expression
1 df-oprab 5516 . 2 {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑣 ∣ ∃𝑥𝑦𝑧(𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑)}
2 nfv 1421 . . . . . . 7 𝑤 𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧
3 nfoprab.1 . . . . . . 7 𝑤𝜑
42, 3nfan 1457 . . . . . 6 𝑤(𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑)
54nfex 1528 . . . . 5 𝑤𝑧(𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑)
65nfex 1528 . . . 4 𝑤𝑦𝑧(𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑)
76nfex 1528 . . 3 𝑤𝑥𝑦𝑧(𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑)
87nfab 2182 . 2 𝑤{𝑣 ∣ ∃𝑥𝑦𝑧(𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑)}
91, 8nfcxfr 2175 1 𝑤{⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑}
Colors of variables: wff set class
Syntax hints:  wa 97   = wceq 1243  wnf 1349  wex 1381  {cab 2026  wnfc 2165  cop 3378  {coprab 5513
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 99  ax-ia2 100  ax-ia3 101  ax-io 630  ax-5 1336  ax-7 1337  ax-gen 1338  ax-ie1 1382  ax-ie2 1383  ax-8 1395  ax-10 1396  ax-11 1397  ax-i12 1398  ax-bndl 1399  ax-4 1400  ax-17 1419  ax-i9 1423  ax-ial 1427  ax-i5r 1428  ax-ext 2022
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 110  df-nf 1350  df-sb 1646  df-clab 2027  df-cleq 2033  df-clel 2036  df-nfc 2167  df-oprab 5516
This theorem is referenced by:  nfmpt2  5573
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator