Intuitionistic Logic Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
Mirrors > Home > ILE Home > Th. List > nfco | GIF version |
Description: Bound-variable hypothesis builder for function value. (Contributed by NM, 1-Sep-1999.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
nfco.1 | ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 |
nfco.2 | ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵 |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
nfco | ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(𝐴 ∘ 𝐵) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | df-co 4354 | . 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ∘ 𝐵) = {〈𝑦, 𝑧〉 ∣ ∃𝑤(𝑦𝐵𝑤 ∧ 𝑤𝐴𝑧)} | |
2 | nfcv 2178 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝑦 | |
3 | nfco.2 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵 | |
4 | nfcv 2178 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝑤 | |
5 | 2, 3, 4 | nfbr 3808 | . . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝑦𝐵𝑤 |
6 | nfco.1 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 | |
7 | nfcv 2178 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝑧 | |
8 | 4, 6, 7 | nfbr 3808 | . . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝑤𝐴𝑧 |
9 | 5, 8 | nfan 1457 | . . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(𝑦𝐵𝑤 ∧ 𝑤𝐴𝑧) |
10 | 9 | nfex 1528 | . . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥∃𝑤(𝑦𝐵𝑤 ∧ 𝑤𝐴𝑧) |
11 | 10 | nfopab 3825 | . 2 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥{〈𝑦, 𝑧〉 ∣ ∃𝑤(𝑦𝐵𝑤 ∧ 𝑤𝐴𝑧)} |
12 | 1, 11 | nfcxfr 2175 | 1 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(𝐴 ∘ 𝐵) |
Colors of variables: wff set class |
Syntax hints: ∧ wa 97 ∃wex 1381 Ⅎwnfc 2165 class class class wbr 3764 {copab 3817 ∘ ccom 4349 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-1 5 ax-2 6 ax-mp 7 ax-ia1 99 ax-ia2 100 ax-ia3 101 ax-io 630 ax-5 1336 ax-7 1337 ax-gen 1338 ax-ie1 1382 ax-ie2 1383 ax-8 1395 ax-10 1396 ax-11 1397 ax-i12 1398 ax-bndl 1399 ax-4 1400 ax-17 1419 ax-i9 1423 ax-ial 1427 ax-i5r 1428 ax-ext 2022 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 110 df-3an 887 df-tru 1246 df-nf 1350 df-sb 1646 df-clab 2027 df-cleq 2033 df-clel 2036 df-nfc 2167 df-v 2559 df-un 2922 df-sn 3381 df-pr 3382 df-op 3384 df-br 3765 df-opab 3819 df-co 4354 |
This theorem is referenced by: nffun 4924 nftpos 5894 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |