Intuitionistic Logic Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
Mirrors > Home > ILE Home > Th. List > nexd | GIF version |
Description: Deduction for generalization rule for negated wff. (Contributed by NM, 2-Jan-2002.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
nexd.1 | ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) |
nexd.2 | ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝜓) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
nexd | ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ ∃𝑥𝜓) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | nexd.1 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) | |
2 | nexd.2 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝜓) | |
3 | 1, 2 | alrimih 1358 | . 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ¬ 𝜓) |
4 | alnex 1388 | . 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ¬ 𝜓 ↔ ¬ ∃𝑥𝜓) | |
5 | 3, 4 | sylib 127 | 1 ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ ∃𝑥𝜓) |
Colors of variables: wff set class |
Syntax hints: ¬ wn 3 → wi 4 ∀wal 1241 ∃wex 1381 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-1 5 ax-2 6 ax-mp 7 ax-ia1 99 ax-ia2 100 ax-ia3 101 ax-in1 544 ax-in2 545 ax-5 1336 ax-gen 1338 ax-ie2 1383 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 110 df-tru 1246 df-fal 1249 |
This theorem is referenced by: nexdv 1811 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |