Theorem indi 3184

Description: Distributive law for intersection over union. Exercise 10 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 17. (Contributed by NM, 30-Sep-2002.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 26-Jun-2011.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
indi	⊢ (𝐴 ∩ (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶)) = ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∪ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐶))

Proof of Theorem indi

Dummy variable 𝑥 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		andi 731	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶)) ↔ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ∨ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶)))
2		elin 3126	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))
3		elin 3126	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐶) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶))
4	2, 3	orbi12i 681	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∨ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐶)) ↔ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ∨ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶)))
5	1, 4	bitr4i 176	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶)) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∨ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐶)))
6		elun 3084	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶))
7	6	anbi2i 430	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶)) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∨ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐶)))
8		elun 3084	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∪ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐶)) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∨ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐶)))
9	5, 7, 8	3bitr4i 201	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶)) ↔ 𝑥 ∈ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∪ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐶)))
10	9	ineqri 3130	1 ⊢ (𝐴 ∩ (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶)) = ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∪ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐶))

Syntax hints:   ∧ wa 97   ∨ wo 629   = wceq 1243   ∈ wcel 1393   ∪ cun 2915   ∩ cin 2916

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 99  ax-ia2 100  ax-ia3 101  ax-io 630  ax-5 1336  ax-7 1337  ax-gen 1338  ax-ie1 1382  ax-ie2 1383  ax-8 1395  ax-10 1396  ax-11 1397  ax-i12 1398  ax-bndl 1399  ax-4 1400  ax-17 1419  ax-i9 1423  ax-ial 1427  ax-i5r 1428  ax-ext 2022

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 110  df-tru 1246  df-nf 1350  df-sb 1646  df-clab 2027  df-cleq 2033  df-clel 2036  df-nfc 2167  df-v 2559  df-un 2922  df-in 2924

This theorem is referenced by:  indir  3186  undisj2  3280  disjssun  3285  difdifdirss  3307  disjpr2  3434  diftpsn3  3505  resundi  4625